Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 信息安全技术频道🔎

Channel

信息安全技术频道🔎

@tg_InternetSecurity

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,531subscribers

-245 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001475134131
TypeChannel
Username@tg_InternetSecurity
Created2 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tg_InternetSecurity

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,53110,77610,653.56 August 202612 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 98 days, net -245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,494–10,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 12:1910,531-1
10 Nov 2026, 12:3910,532-11
7 Nov 2026, 10:3910,543+2
6 Nov 2026, 12:4610,541-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:4810,543-4
4 Nov 2026, 08:2510,547-3
3 Nov 2026, 09:0610,550-3
2 Nov 2026, 12:3610,553+1
1 Nov 2026, 13:2610,552+5
31 Oct 2026, 10:1410,547+1
30 Oct 2026, 07:3910,546-4
29 Oct 2026, 09:0610,550+2
28 Oct 2026, 04:1010,548-2
27 Oct 2026, 06:0010,550-3
26 Oct 2026, 09:0510,553-1
25 Oct 2026, 06:4610,554-8
24 Oct 2026, 05:0510,562-3
23 Oct 2026, 05:3910,565-8
22 Oct 2026, 05:3810,573-4
20 Oct 2026, 20:0610,577first reading

Engagement

234 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.41%
avg views ÷ 10,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
254
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 234 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held234 (2 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total13,705
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,520
Videos
≈788
Links
≈6,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 54s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 25 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1446.7%
👍1136.7%
😁310.0%
🔥13.33%
😱13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (1.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC345 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

“温柔陷阱”:从黄仁勋到六十年中共色诱

10 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC312 viewsread 13 November 2026

消息:黄仁勋出轨女主角 由中共国安部长直接指挥

10 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC305 viewsread 13 November 2026

【时事金扫描】黄仁勋出轨 情妇涉诈骗大案 沈伯洋谈中共“色戒”

8 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC449 viewsread 13 November 2026

从川普的“反共产主义周” 聊输家赢家和更信谁 西方民主的基石是对神的信仰和道德自律。可现在真正关心美国利益、在乎美国前途的美国公民还剩多少? 川普团队真的了解中共的本性吗?以八十岁高龄仍在为美国奔波不停的川普,忙碌中,究竟是信自己的商业谈判能力、作为CEO主持国家事务的能力更多?还是信上帝、信创世主更多呢?这个问题性命攸关,需要坐下来,静下心来审视,凭良心回答。

8 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC400 viewsread 13 November 2026

中南海要变天?昨日北京坠落巨大火流星

8 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC354 viewsread 13 November 2026

独家内幕:黄奇帆口头“遗嘱”:习近平断不会让他活着走出秦城

8 Nov 2026, 13:15 UTC338 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

中共喜歡賊喊捉賊。 小粉紅污蔑台灣去中國化,其實真正去中國化的是共產黨。 宣傳「馬列主義」、破四舊、改漢字都是中共搞出來。 沒有共產黨 才有新中國 三退網址: https://tuidang.epochtimes.com/ 北美三退熱線: +1 (888) 976-6568 三退郵箱: [email protected] 三退快捷通道: https://tinyurl.com/2g99xruj

8 Nov 2026, 13:12 UTC275 viewsread 13 November 2026

捏造收军购回扣!沈伯洋遭深伪抹黑 数发部联手Meta耗73分钟斩草除根

8 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC260 viewsread 13 November 2026

每天遭网攻280万次 台官员:防卫经验欧洲借镜

8 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC274 viewsread 13 November 2026

黑客直接威胁食药安全 美五大部门联合警告

8 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC253 viewsread 13 November 2026

法国金融巨擎旗下银行遭网攻 损失上亿美元

Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @tg_InternetSecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,602
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,209
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
电报时报
@times001 · 84,547
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“信息安全技术频道🔎” (@tg_InternetSecurity), 10,531 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg_InternetSecurity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.