😐 Unfair that CEOs who aren’t into Asian girls get fewer dating options from spy agencies. 👀 Where are the French/Russian/Iranian honeypots? Not one spy girl sent my way. Are they even trying? 🤷♀️ 🌈 France is excused — their decision-makers aren’t into girls. Everyone else: try harder! 🤨

Channel
Gift News
@G_I_2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
12,875subscribers
-6,388 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001499395828 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @G_I_2 |
| Description | محتوى القناة : نصائح و اخبار سوق العملات الرقميه وهدايا الـ NFT ⚡️Раньше всех выкладываем все новости по нфт подаркам! По рекламе - @deema |
| Created | Between 1 October 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/G_I_2 |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 13:50 | 12,875 | -1,298 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 03:35 | 14,173 | -43 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:47 | 14,216 | -39 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 14,255 | -75 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 14,330 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 14,332 | +39 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:29 | 14,293 | -32 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 14,325 | -34 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:45 | 14,359 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 14,390 | -32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 14,422 | -36 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 14,458 | -31 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 14,489 | -33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 14,522 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 14,536 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:14 | 14,549 | -36 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:45 | 14,585 | -33 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 14,618 | +15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 14,603 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:07 | 14,609 | first reading |
Engagement
218 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.35%
- avg views ÷ 12,875 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 431
- 94 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 20.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 218 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 218 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 40,483 |
| Reactions total | 7,365 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 23:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,450
- Videos
- ≈240
- Links
- ≈539
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 44s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,065 reactions across 112 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5212979734765407344 | 1,704 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5213202175416634230 | 1,701 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5213412216497277889 | 1,498 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5213392060215754980 | 1,463 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5215259821233702526 | 1,396 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5397683244256766102 | 251 | 2.77% | |
| custom 5397585417786657369 | 232 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5301225369779606793 | 226 | 2.49% | |
| custom 5852932915591124806 | 217 | 2.39% | |
| custom 5397822787744211453 | 194 | 2.14% | |
| custom 5456544018701779522 | 183 | 2.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 218 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 218 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 157
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 218 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 101
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @G_I_2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 218 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 94 posts held from the last 30 days (4.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎃 هدية لم ترَ النور أحد المصممين أشار إلى أن هذه الهدية كانت مقررة لإطلاقها في عيد الهالوين كمجموعة منفصلة. ولكن في النهاية، تم تغيير القرار وتحويلها إلى أحد موديلات الأقنعة 🎃.
custom 521341221649727788924custom 521297973476540734420custom 521320217541663423020custom 521339206021575498017custom 521525982123370252615
ثغرة أمنية في أدوات Telegram على نظام Android. اكتشف باحث ثغرة أمنية خطيرة تسمح لأدوات الروبوتات بتشغيل تطبيقات خارجية على نظام Android. ينصح بالامتناع عن تشغيل أدوات الروبوتات غير المألوفة حتى يتم إصدار التصحيح، وتحديث تطبيق Telegram إلى أحدث إصدار.
⚙️ صيانة مؤقتة في ماركت 🥰 خلال فترة الصيانة، ستكون الميزات التالية غير متاحة مؤقتًا: — عمليات سحب الرصيد؛ — عمليات سحب الهدايا؛ — عمليات شراء "النجوم" وخدمة "تيليجرام بريميوم"; — عمليات سحب "سكينز" (CS). ستتم استعادة هذه الميزات بمجرد اكتمال الاختبارات. شكرًا لتفهمكم. سنبقيك على اطلاع دائم.
custom 521339206021575498021custom 521297973476540734419custom 521320217541663423019custom 521341221649727788917custom 521525982123370252617
💻 سيقومون باختراق الجميع صرح رئيس شركة "Ledger" بأنه في وقت ما أو آخر، سيتم اختراق الجميع، حيث لا توجد حماية مطلقة. مع تطور الذكاء الاصطناعي، تصبح الهجمات أسرع وأكثر تعقيدًا. لذلك، يجب على الشركات تحسين أنظمة الحماية باستمرار والعمل معًا لتطوير معايير الأمان. هذا التصريح من شركة متخصصة في محافظ العملات المشفرة يبدو واعدًا بشكل خاص 🙂
custom 521339206021575498027custom 521341221649727788922custom 521525982123370252617custom 521297973476540734415custom 521320217541663423014
👛 Over 1 million self-custodial Gram wallets activated on Telegram in the last 48 hours alone. 🥇 Gram is today’s #1 gainer among the top 100 coins by market cap, up 10% in 24 hours.
custom 521341221649727788910custom 52132021754166342308custom 52133920602157549808custom 52129797347654073446custom 52152598212337025266
قلت لكم بيطلع سعره يخي توقعاتي في محالها
custom 521341221649727788926custom 521339206021575498023custom 521320217541663423021custom 521525982123370252616custom 52129797347654073447
1.23$
custom 521341221649727788910custom 521525982123370252610custom 52129797347654073448custom 52132021754166342306custom 52133920602157549805
1.19$
custom 521297973476540734413custom 521341221649727788911custom 52152598212337025268custom 52132021754166342306custom 52133920602157549802
🐶 "المؤمن الحقيقي" قام شخص بتقدير ما كان سيحدث إذا كان يشتري عملة TON بمبلغ 1 دولار أمريكي كل يوم منذ ظهورها. 📈 في مرحلة ما، كان الربح في هذه "المحفظة" سيصل إلى ما يقرب من +5000 دولار أمريكي. 📉 ولكن بعد أكثر من 1900 يوم من الشراء، تبقى من المبلغ المستثمر البالغ 1902 دولارًا أمريكيًا حوالي 998 دولارًا أمريكيًا. الخسارة بلغت 900 دولار أمريكي، والعائد -47%. يا ليت كنا قد بعنا عملة TON بسعر 8 دولارات أمريكية في ذلك الوقت…
إذا التزم بول بوعوده (وهو أمر غير مرجح)، وأصبح "جرام" من بين أفضل ثلاث عملات في بورصة CMC، فسيكون سعر الجرام الواحد 61.58 دولاراً 💎
custom 521297973476540734421custom 521341221649727788921custom 521320217541663423019custom 521525982123370252618custom 521339206021575498014
ما الذي دفع "باشا" إلى التسرع ونشر هذا المنشور؟ السبب هو صفقة كبيرة ستُعلن اليوم. إذا تم طرح هذه الكمية الكبيرة من "الجرامات" للبيع دفعة واحدة بقيمة 40.850.000 دولار، فمن المؤكد أن الأسعار سترتفع بشكل كبير.
custom 521341221649727788922custom 521320217541663423019custom 521297973476540734418custom 521339206021575498018custom 521525982123370252616
Showing the 12 most recent of 218 posts we hold for @G_I_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@G_I_2 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 30 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 11 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 12 posts on @G_I_2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 11 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 19 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 6
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@durov · 10,056,8634 postsAdele Toberg
@adele_toberg · 6,7132 postsПодарки от Скруджа
@GIFT_PODARKI · 132,9132 postsOHUENKO Chat
@OHUENKOchat · 77,7372 postsAlex's news ⚒️📃
@Alexs_news_2026 · 931 postCaring Eagle – Round 2
@caringeagle · 641 postCointelegraph
@cointelegraph · 325,3551 postTelegram Contests
@contest · 296,9661 postTelegram Designers
@designers · 80,0351 postBALENCIAGA
@groza · 561,7251 postروليت سراب
@Rooltt_bot · 85,9061 postسحوبات روليت سراب
@sarap68 · 13,4851 postСтенка
@stenka · 20,4761 postteleLakel
@telelakel · 19,2671 postThe Daily TON | News
@thedailyton · 244,6571 postZeroikins
@zeroikins1 · 1,8811 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gift News” (@G_I_2), 12,875 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/G_I_2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.