Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gift News

@G_I_2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,320subscribers

-943 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001499395828
TypeChannel
Username@G_I_2
CreatedBetween 1 June 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/G_I_2

Growth

18,32019,26318,791.57 August 2026 — 19,263 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,155 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,776 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,591 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,426 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,320 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -943. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,179–19,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:2918,320-106
12 Aug 2026, 13:0818,426-165
11 Aug 2026, 11:3518,591-185
10 Aug 2026, 11:5618,776-168
9 Aug 2026, 09:1218,944-211
8 Aug 2026, 08:0119,155-108
7 Aug 2026, 16:0119,263first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.10%
avg views ÷ 18,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
568
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held41 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total23,292
Reactions total1,673
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,673 reactions across 26 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 539758541778665736923213.9%
custom 530122536977960679322613.5%
custom 539768324425676610222413.4%
custom 585293291559112480621713.0%
custom 521297973476540734420312.1%
custom 521320217541663423019411.6%
custom 539782278774421145319411.6%
custom 545654401870177952218310.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,673reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC174 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎁 تتوفر الآن هدايا جديدة! 🎂 50⭐️ - غير محدود

12 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC234 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚫️ احتمالية 15٪ للحصول على خلفية سوداء. 🎁 في "Intelligence Cup"، تم إلغاء إمكانية ظهور خلفيات غير جذابة. الخلفية الأكثر شيوعًا ستكون الخلفية السوداء، مع احتمال 15٪.

12 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC227 viewsread 13 August 2026

t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-1 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-2 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-3 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-4 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-5 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-6 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-7 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-8 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-9 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-10 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-11 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-12 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-13 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-14 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-15 t.me/nft/

12 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC231 viewsread 13 August 2026

t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-1 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-2 t.me/nft/IntelligenceCup-3 будущие Intelligence Cup #1-3 будут тут ^

12 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC256 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🍰 هل أنت مستعد لاحتفال عيد ميلاد تطبيق تيليجرام؟ — بعد يومين فقط، سيحتفل تطبيق تيليجرام بمرور 13 عامًا، وبالتالي، قد يقوم "باشوك" بالاحتفال بهذه المناسبة بإصدار تحديث جديد. 💎 في الخوادم التجريبية، تم بالفعل اكتشاف محفظة TON المدمجة، والتي أعلن عنها "دوروف" مؤخرًا. ما رأيكم، هل سيقوم "دوروف" بإحياء مشروع TON الخاص بنا بمناسبة هذا الاحتفال، أم لن يكون هناك أي تغييرات؟

12 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC255 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

💎 يا له من شيء نحتاجه! قيّموا المفهوم الذي يجعل علامات التحقق تفاعلية - عند الضغط عليها، تظهر معلومات تفصيلية حول عملية التحقق. 🧸 سيصبح الأمر أكثر وضوحًا للمستخدمين العاديين حول سبب أهمية هذه العلامات وكيفية الحصول عليها. من وجهة نظري، هذا ممتاز. أسمح بدمجه. 🤣 ✔️ الحصول على علامة التحقق

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC387 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😋 قبعة بعد عام من التجاهل المستخدم @allex روى قصة عن كيف تم تجميد حسابه في 5 يونيو 2025، وبعد مرور ما يقرب من عام، تم حذفه نهائيًا. خلال هذه الفترة، تواصل مع دوف ثلاث مرات، وأرسل طلبات يومية إلى الدعم الفني. وحتى أن شخصًا ما استغل موقفه وخدعه بـ 800 دولار أمريكي مقابل "المساعدة". في الحساب الذي تم حجبه، بقي 9 هدايا: Durov's Cap #443 وثماني تقويمات مكتبية: #260948، #145514، #13127، #78757، #210768، #306589، #265863

11 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC368 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔮 تنبؤات حول عملة GRAM أصدرت شركة 21Shares توقعات بشأن السعر المحتمل لعملة GRAM على مدار عام واحد. 💎 ثلاثة سيناريوهات رئيسية فقط: سيناريو محزن: انخفاض بنسبة 98٪ سيناريو معتدل: ارتفاع بنسبة 42٪ سيناريو إيجابي: ارتفاع بنسبة 1337٪ يا له من تباين... ليس أسوأ من توقعات المحللين في مجموعات الدردشة. من الواضح أن المحللين يحصلون على رواتبهم عن جدارة 🙂

11 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC307 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔴 هل هذا هو أكبر عملية احتيال مرتبطة بـ TON في عام 2026؟ — قام المحتالون بإنشاء قصة كاملة حول مشروع الذكاء الاصطناعي "Vision"، والذي يُزعم أنه تم إنشاؤه بواسطة نيكولاي دوروف. 🤥 وفقًا للقصة، فقد كانوا يعملون عليه لمدة خمس سنوات، واستغرق تطويره 101.75 مليون دولار، وتم جمع 5 ملايين دولار مؤخرًا في جولة استثمارية جديدة. لإضفاء المصداقية، ظهر موقع شخصي، وحساب على LinkedIn، ووثيقة تقنية ضخمة. ولكن في الواقع، بدلاً من "

11 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC315 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🧹 دوروف يدعو إلى التنظيف يدفع تطبيق تيليجرام مستخدمي تويتر إلى الخروج إلى الشارع والتفاعل مع الطبيعة، من خلال إطلاق أول تحدي "في الحياة الواقعية". 🧹 للمشاركة، يجب على المستخدمين تنظيف حديقة أو منطقة عشبية أو أي مكان عام آخر، وعرض النتائج في صور "قبل وبعد". أربعة من أفضل المشاركين سيحصلون على 100 USDT لكل منهم، والوقت المتاح لإكمال التحدي هو 72 ساعة. هل تبحثون عن طريقة مضمونة لكسب المال في نظام تيون البيئي؟ إليكم

11 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC377 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📢 احتيال جديد على تطبيق تيليجرام وجد المحتالون طريقة جديدة لتجاوز حماية تطبيق تيليجرام ضد التلاعب بنصوص العروض من خلال استخدام لغات مخصصة. 🔄 إنهم يقترحون تثبيت لغة الواجهة التي تقوم بتبديل تسميات أزرار "قبول" و "رفض". ومع ذلك، تظل وظائف الأزرار كما هي: عند الضغط على الزر الذي يحمل تسمية "رفض"، يتم قبول العرض. الأفضل تحظر الشخص حتى م تتعرض لعملية إحتيال

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @G_I_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 987,097 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gift News” (@G_I_2), 18,320 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/G_I_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.