🚀If you want to keep up to date with all the events and participate in discussions about TON, then you should contact us - TonDreamer✨
For cooperation - @QwezyTen
I don’t give financial advice, I only share my opinion)
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9,280. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 791,120–803,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:43
792,512
-1,965
11 Aug 2026, 06:41
794,477
-1,405
10 Aug 2026, 05:51
795,882
-1,768
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
797,650
-1,484
8 Aug 2026, 03:52
799,134
-1,287
7 Aug 2026, 01:43
800,421
-1,154
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
801,575
-217
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
801,792
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.184%
avg views ÷ 792,512 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.962%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (7 May 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
2,912
Reactions total
28
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
322
Videos
41
Links
150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
395 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
135
34.2%
🔥
126
31.9%
👍
61
15.4%
😁
19
4.81%
💯
11
2.78%
😇
7
1.77%
🤪
5
1.27%
👌
4
1.01%
😘
4
1.01%
🎃
3
0.759%
⚡
2
0.506%
✍
2
0.506%
🍾
2
0.506%
🐳
2
0.506%
👾
2
0.506%
🗿
2
0.506%
🫡
2
0.506%
❤🔥
1
0.253%
🌚
1
0.253%
🍓
1
0.253%
3 further kinds
3
0.759%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TonDreamerEng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🍿It is always interesting to observe the mood in the industry. When there is a total bearish vibe around, it seems that there will be no more growth.
But if you look at it soberly, can it even happen if the community is mentally at the bottom? Of course it can. Anything is possible in this world. It is during periods like this, when most people bury projects and stop working, that those who persevere come.
Victory …
Come as a boy — leave as a king.
Today is the final push. Whether it will be victorious, the game will decide, but one thing cannot be taken away: without a legend, football will not be the same 🥹
🤩I have a feeling something cool is about to happen with the tone, like it's about to take off. Unfortunately, I have a bit of TA knowledge and haven't really gotten into trading, but my intuition rarely fails me. In any case, DYOR, but it doesn't smell like a dump.)
By the way, it is currently $1.64, and when the market crashed hard in October, even this price per ton was wiped out in less than a week. Every hunter…
🤩Talents is a platform from the very owls that TON conquered
🤷♂️They are planning to launch soon, but they are still collecting a budget. In fact, you become a co-owner and receive a portion of the Talents platform’s commissions for HODL $TNT coins.
🎃Not a financial recommendation, but if you’re interested, you can look
Back in 2016-2017, my acquaintance was trading ETH; at that time, the price was around $15, as I recall, and possibly even lower. He was making good money, you could say, a lot of it, but we learned a huge lesson from this experience:
HOLD > Trade
Not because he was getting wiped out in every bearish phase, not because he was getting too little in the moment, but because he was getting too little over the long term…
From today until the complete rebranding of TON in GRAM, I’m hacking into Pixel World, otherwise, as a beggar, running with the most stock is not a thrill.🌎
Well, you just don’t sit there either, let’s fly in to play
It’s nice, but there’s clearly no reason to relax)
Let’s see what happens next
❤12🔥5👍4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TonDreamerEng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 204,982 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CashFlow‘s Calls @CashFlowsCalls · 539,368 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
The Daily TON | News @thedailyton · 265,789 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Tonologia Eng @tonologiaENG · 707,462 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Web3Key @Web3key_eng · 476,440 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
the noton @thenoton · 768,799 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Not a trader ENG @NotatraderENG · 520,679 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
TON POINTER ENG @TONPOINTEReng · 574,598 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Trade Notcoin @not_a_trade · 224,427 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
TON Status @tonstatus · 163,271 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Battles @battlesjam · 403,891 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 308,767 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
GT Protocol Announcements Channel @GTProtocolNews · 256,683 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,338,925 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Evan Luthra Alpha @EvanLuthraVIP · 311,156 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
ChainGPT Official Announcements Channel @ChainGPTNews · 410,973 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
TON Покер Новости @tonpokerroomnews · 203,946 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
xRocket News @xrocketnews · 237,696 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Fastex Exchange News @fastexexchange_news · 288,803 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
TON Community @toncommunitychannel · 812,552 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
CryptoTheDoggy | Blockchain News, Insights & Learning @cryptothedoggy · 148,959 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Getgems NFT @getgems · 278,417 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TonDreamer Eng” (@TonDreamerEng), 792,512 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TonDreamerEng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.