The Future of Crypto 📊
Trusted Web3 & Crypto media
News, analyses, insights & more.
DM for Business:
📩 @Web3Key_Support
A Key of Web3 🔑
Persian: @Web3Key_Fa
Created
Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net -39,110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 435,319–486,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:20
441,185
-6,202
17 Sept 2026, 08:01
447,387
-1,466
15 Sept 2026, 06:59
448,853
-1,454
13 Sept 2026, 14:41
450,307
-1,598
11 Sept 2026, 17:20
451,905
-2,154
9 Sept 2026, 03:16
454,059
-3,446
5 Sept 2026, 18:01
457,505
-2,341
3 Sept 2026, 15:18
459,846
-1,133
2 Sept 2026, 05:45
460,979
-863
1 Sept 2026, 08:09
461,842
-1,200
31 Aug 2026, 11:25
463,042
-1,150
30 Aug 2026, 08:05
464,192
-871
29 Aug 2026, 05:05
465,063
-686
28 Aug 2026, 08:23
465,749
-639
27 Aug 2026, 08:54
466,388
-375
26 Aug 2026, 08:26
466,763
-773
25 Aug 2026, 05:27
467,536
-1,017
24 Aug 2026, 03:16
468,553
-1,355
22 Aug 2026, 12:32
469,908
-1,237
20 Aug 2026, 23:48
471,145
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.223%
avg views ÷ 441,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
985
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.227%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
43 (25 March 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
20,679
Reactions total
39
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,010
Videos
≈70
Links
≈1,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
229 reactions across 37 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
83
36.2%
🔥
62
27.1%
⚡
19
8.30%
👏
19
8.30%
👍
17
7.42%
😁
16
6.99%
🆒
4
1.75%
👌
3
1.31%
💯
2
0.873%
❤🔥
1
0.437%
😭
1
0.437%
😱
1
0.437%
🥰
1
0.437%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 43 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Web3key_eng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📌 IMPORTANT TIPS FOR THIS SEMI-BULLISH MARKET
These are some lessons I’ve learned from being in the market since 2017, and I think they’re especially important right now:
1️⃣ Take Profit at Major Levels
Don’t take profit at every random resistance. Focus on important levels and major higher-timeframe resistance zones.
2️⃣ Look for Re-entries After Corrections
If you take profit and the price later pulls back to a …
Hello everyone 🌹
By using the referral link mentioned in the post above, you’ll not only receive the bonuses mentioned, but after registering, you can also join our V.I.P Short-Term Futures Trading Channel for FREE.
Simply send your UID after registration to the bot below:
🤖 VIP Bot:
https://t.me/Btcafkar_bot
Once you send your UID, we’ll guide you through the free VIP access process. 📈
🎁 $200,000 in Prizes — With a 100% Chance to Win!
🎡 LBank Lucky Wheel Event is LIVE!
Complete different tasks to earn chances to spin the wheel and win exciting rewards like 🪙, 💰, 💰, 💰 and many other special prizes!
🎯 How to Earn More Chances?
✅ New users — First Spot Trade: 2 chances
✅ New users — First Futures Trade: 3 chances
✅ Daily Spot Trading: Up to 4 chances
✅ Daily Futures Trading: Up to 2 chances
✅ Incre…
🚨🔥 TOP CRYPTO NEWS FROM THE LAST 48 HOURS
The crypto market has become increasingly active over the past 48 hours, with several major developments impacting Bitcoin, altcoins, ETFs, and US crypto regulation:
🟠 Bitcoin Reclaims $80,000
BTC recovered strongly and pushed toward the $81K area. $82K remains an important short-term resistance level.
🟣 Ethereum & Altcoins Rally
ETH gained around 7%, while SOL surged more…
🧬 WHEN BLOCKCHAINS COME BACK TO ETHEREUM...
One of the most interesting developments recently came from Harmony (ONE).
Harmony announced plans to shut down its Layer 1 blockchain and migrate ONE to Ethereum as an ERC-20 token.
A project that once operated as an independent Layer 1 is now choosing Ethereum as the foundation for the next chapter of its ecosystem.
And what happened next?
ONE exploded. 🚀
After the …
🇺🇸 FED | RATE HIKE
The Federal Reserve raised interest rates from 3.75% to 4%, in line with expectations.
🎙️ Fed Chair Kevin Warsh will speak at 22:00 Iran time. His comments on the future path of interest rates will be crucial for the market’s short-term direction.
#FED #FOMC #Bitcoin #Crypto
🌍 Bitcoin Represents Just 0.5% of the World’s Financial Assets
The total value of global financial assets is estimated at around $342 trillion, while Bitcoin accounts for only $1.6 trillion — just 0.5% of the total.
For comparison:
📊 Stocks: $154T | 45%
📊 Bonds: $143T | 41.8%
🥇 Gold: $31T | 9.1%
💵 Money Markets: $13T | 3.8%
₿ Bitcoin: $1.6T | 0.5%
🔎 The interesting part?
Despite Bitcoin’s growing adoption and ins…
🚨 Crypto Trading Volume Is Back — Bullish Signal? 📈
According to CryptoQuant, crypto trading volume has picked up again after months of weakness.
📊 Spot trading volume reached around $75B, while perpetual futures volume surpassed $336B.
📈 The rise in volume alongside a roughly 25% increase in Bitcoin’s price could signal a return of demand.
⚠️ However, part of the surge came from short position closures and liqui…
🚨 BREAKING | CLARITY Act FAILS IN THE U.S. SENATE 🇺🇸
The U.S. Senate voted today on advancing the CLARITY Act, but the bill failed to secure the 60 votes required to move forward.
🔹 What is the CLARITY Act?
A major bill designed to establish a clearer regulatory framework for the crypto market in the U.S. and define the roles of regulators such as the SEC and CFTC.
🔹 Why did it hit a roadblock?
Democrats pushed fo…
🚨 BREAKING | CLARITY ACT DEAL COLLAPSES 🇺🇸
Republicans have rejected the Democrats’ latest counter-offer on the CLARITY Act, just hours before the crucial Senate vote.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis’ spokesperson said Democrats “have not budged an inch” from their previous position.
📉 Following the breakdown in negotiations, Polymarket odds for the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 have plunged to around 10% or lower.
⚠️ The…
🚨 Tonkeeper Rebrands as “Keeper”!
Tonkeeper, one of the largest non-custodial wallets in the TON ecosystem with more than 77 million registered users, is changing its name to Keeper as it expands into multiple blockchain networks.
🔗 Keeper now supports:
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base and TON.
The goal is to evolve from a TON-focused wallet into a broader multi-chain crypto platform.
⚡️ Keeper’…
👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Web3key_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tonologia Eng @tonologiaENG · 642,411 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Queens : The best place for Crypto Knowledge! @CryptoQueensAlpha · 34,474 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Not a trader ENG @NotatraderENG · 482,696 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
<\> Sharding, TON's, two Jetons </>. @ton2keng · 592,806 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
CashFlow‘s Calls @CashFlowsCalls · 508,677 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
the noton @thenoton · 702,755 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
TonDreamer Eng @TonDreamerEng · 735,160 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
TON POINTER ENG @TONPOINTEReng · 539,702 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Cryptopolitan @CryptopolitanOfficial · 25,000 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Anatoly Makosov @anatoly_makosov · 42,515 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Wyck of Web3 Alpha @teddyalphas · 77,250 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Filip Trading Community Official @filiptradingcommunity · 22,490 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
$STYLE Official @styletoken · 46,652 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
GRAM Content English @TONContentEnglish · 579,903 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
CryptoTheDoggy | Blockchain News, Insights & Learning @cryptothedoggy · 142,759 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Class Community Official @cryptoclass247 · 24,367 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 September 2026
Reality Metaverse @RealityMeta · 41,770 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Unchained @unchainedweb3 · 43,699 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 59,553 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Hunters | Announcements @cryptohunters_announcements · 70,926 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Soothsayer @cryptosayer · 774,971 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 124,846 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Gem Hunters @gemhunt · 128,387 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
GameGPT | Announcements @gamegptANN · 119,899 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Web3Key” (@Web3key_eng), 441,185 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Web3key_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.