getgems.io — the Home of NFT collections on The Open Network - an ultra-fast, secure, and truly decentralized blockchain network.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/getgemsdotio
Support: @nfton_bot
Created
8 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -8,864. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 269,436–280,960 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 10:00
270,766
-712
18 Sept 2026, 21:20
271,478
-414
16 Sept 2026, 13:56
271,892
-378
14 Sept 2026, 15:37
272,270
-343
13 Sept 2026, 03:39
272,613
-408
11 Sept 2026, 02:19
273,021
-623
8 Sept 2026, 03:20
273,644
-721
4 Sept 2026, 21:17
274,365
-342
3 Sept 2026, 06:46
274,707
-240
1 Sept 2026, 23:54
274,947
-138
31 Aug 2026, 20:43
275,085
-166
30 Aug 2026, 17:33
275,251
-142
29 Aug 2026, 20:42
275,393
-102
28 Aug 2026, 23:36
275,495
-106
27 Aug 2026, 22:16
275,601
-79
27 Aug 2026, 01:34
275,680
-176
26 Aug 2026, 01:08
275,856
-194
25 Aug 2026, 01:15
276,050
-312
23 Aug 2026, 12:58
276,362
-288
22 Aug 2026, 00:37
276,650
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.76%
avg views ÷ 270,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,200
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
26 (1 June 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
30,510
Reactions total
322
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
606
Videos
30
Links
624
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,301 reactions across 25 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
780
33.9%
🔥
341
14.8%
👍
262
11.4%
😢
100
4.35%
✍
89
3.87%
⚡
86
3.74%
❤🔥
77
3.35%
👏
64
2.78%
🤓
62
2.69%
🐳
59
2.56%
🦄
42
1.83%
🥰
36
1.56%
💅
33
1.43%
🫡
33
1.43%
🎉
32
1.39%
👌
31
1.35%
🙏
27
1.17%
🤗
24
1.04%
🆒
23
1%
👎
21
0.913%
7 further kinds
79
3.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
139
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 25 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
53
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @getgems. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👛 Tonkeeper → Keeper
The most popular wallet on TON just got a major update!
Tonkeeper has been one of the easiest ways to get into TON — from tokens and NFTs to apps and the wider ecosystem. Now it’s called Keeper, with support for Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRON, Arbitrum, Base and BNB Chain too. 💎
All the TON features you already know are still there, now joined by a whole set of new networks and possibilities.
Update…
✈️ Buying Stars is a flight mission now
The main stage of One Swap. Across Chains by STON.fi is now live. Six weeks of actually exploring how cross-chain swaps connect TON with other networks. 💎
And Getgems has a mission on the flight too:
⭐️ Start on STON.fi and join the campaign
• Explore the cross-chain missions
• Find Getgems in Partner Missions
• Buy 350+ Telegram Stars on Getgems in one purchase
• Earn 350 m…
💎 Support update
Yep, AI is joining the chat. 🦶
Its job is to speed up the first line of support — answering the usual questions faster, from how the platform works to wallets, transactions, and all the other stuff users regularly run into.
If your case needs an actual human, a closer look, or some proper digging, it goes straight to the support team as usual.
Same place, same bot: @nfton_bot
And the usual safet…
🍀 3 Months of Lucky Buy! Join the Raffle 🍀
We launched Lucky Buy this spring — and you’ve been saving in a whole new way for a quarter of a year. Here is what this buying mechanic achieved 👇
🤨 Highlights:
• 84 800+ GRAM — total savings by participants. Avg. discount on success— 47% off the gift price.
• Biggest deal: Scared Cat #9383 at 25% probability, saving — 705 GRAM!
• Trending collections: Vice Creams (524…
😆 Summer’s still here, and so the August Sticker Digest
Stores were cooking non-stop this month — here’s your full roundup 👇
Goodies — drops, memes & workshops
Introduced a new evolving entity named Yum and announced an upcoming Jelly airdrop. Launched their very first TON meme crossover with FAST. Activated Nullie: Chaos & Mayhem recipes in the Forge.
@goodies
VeVe — collection wrapped & Drop 2 teased
Official…
📱 Anonymous Telegram Numbers: a bit of +888 lore
Well before the Telegram Gifts trend kicked off, one of the most successful use cases in blockchain had already emerged. Best of all, it had real utility — Anonymous Telegram Numbers.
👆 Swipe through the cards to catch up on the lore: how the numbers launched and jumped up in price.
🎂🎂🎂
And of course, Happy B-Day to Telegram! 1⃣3⃣ years of evolution from a simple m…
💎 How to buy GRAM
To get started on TON, you’ll usually need a little GRAM — to cover network fees, buy Telegram Gifts, or send an NFT to a friend.
Here are the main ways to buy GRAM 💳
🌀 Centralized and decentralized exchanges
You can buy GRAM on centralized exchanges such as OKX, Bybit, or Gate, etc. These platforms may require identity verification, and your funds will remain on the exchange until you withdraw t…
🤑 "How to withdraw money from Getgems?" — revealing another secret
Rookies often ask: "I sold an NFT, where are my coins on Getgems? How do I withdraw them?".
Plot twist: they’re not there. 🫡
Getgems does not store your money. And honestly, it doesn't want to 😌
That is exactly why there's no internal balance, no "Withdraw" button, and definitely no “your request will be processed within 3 business days.”
During …
😎 Sun-baked July Sticker Digest is here
Stores keep delivering great news, so we’ve gathered the most interesting July events 👇
Goodies — more memes, chats and events!
Dropped the Hat SZN doggo collection and opened the exclusive Teddie Trenches chat for rare sticker holders. Plus, ran burn and Antimatter gathering events to craft rare Glitched Eggs.
@goodies
VeVe — final touches on their debut collection
The t…
💎 Onchain and offchain: where are your gifts stored?
Gifts can have two statuses. This post is for beginners to make it clear how both formats work:
📦 Offchain aka "outside the blockchain"
A gift that "lives" inside the Telegram database. It stays tied to your Telegram account.
Pros: easy transfer within Telegram (the first one after upgrading is free, following ones are 25 Stars each), and you can also trade the…
🐰 Market consensus
Every market finds its sweet spot over time, and Telegram Gifts are no exception.
Starting today, the trading fee for both onchain and offchain gifts is 2%.
Over the past year, we've seen it all: 5% fees, then 0% during the peak hype, and now a moderate 2%.
This fee helps prevent market manipulation, ensures a clean trading environment, and supports our infrastructure 💎
👀 Follow Getgems: Buy S…
❤56👌21🤝13🫡11🤓9
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @getgems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@getgems edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 89 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TON Diamonds NFT @tondiamonds · 132,862 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Battles @battlesjam · 387,778 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Shardify | by Meridian @shardify · 23,242 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
Sense @sense_ton · 27,420 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Forward Protocol @ForwardProtocol · 45,425 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Exverse Announcements @exverse · 34,367 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Not Contest @not_contest · 36,122 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
JVault @JVault · 31,215 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
TonUP 🚀 @TonUP_io · 38,053 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Gsmgarden @gsmgarden · 23,688 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
DeDust.io – TON DEX @dedust_en · 67,919 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Grm Official @grmcoinorg · 173,706 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
Orbs Announcements 🌐 @OrbsAnnouncements · 74,224 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
EVAA @evaaprotocol · 264,507 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Kirill Malev @kirill_malev · 23,735 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,221,671 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
ULTRADE Announcements @ULTRADE_Announcement · 30,266 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Tonnel Network @tonnel_en · 180,896 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
The Daily TON | News @thedailyton · 256,828 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Tonstarter @ton_starter · 799,621 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
TON Dev News @tondev_news · 40,978 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
xRocket News @xrocketnews · 229,329 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
✍🏾 Howard’s Channel @telepeng · 110,295 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
Not Guide @notguide · 464,801 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Getgems NFT” (@getgems), 270,766 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getgems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.