2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 21:16
145
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:34
145
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 8 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Links
12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
240 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5447106038522198872
116
48.3%
custom 5260249805522744465
70
29.2%
custom 5107558323671008257
54
22.5%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2023 to 29 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😱 Revealing all the secrets of the secret event Ton Raffles x DeDust event
We are launching a series of activities aimed at filling your holidays with good vibes, and your wallets with valuable tokens, starting from today until the end of January 💎
Stage 1️⃣
— Prize pool of $10,000 in $SCALE
— Will run until January 13th inclusive.
🎯 To participate, you need to:
— Become a liquidity provider in the jUSDT/RAFF pair…
🚀 TON-20 marketplace by the Scaleton team
⚫️ Today, the creators of the decentralized exchange DeDust.io have unveiled ton20.market — a marketplace for inscription tokens on the TON blockchain offering the ecosystem's lowest fees.
⚫️ Earlier this week, DeDust.io teased a new product on their Twitter, but without official confirmation. Turnes out they were serious after all.
⚫️ Featuring a thoughtfully designed int…
⚠️ Please be careful. Gram20.com standard takes fee in TON during mining. One mint transaction will cost you 0.96 TON
⚠️ 请注意, Gram20.com 标准在挖矿过程中会以 TON 收取费用。一次铸币交易将花费你 0.96 TON。
@TonShardMarket
🔩 When using the gram20.com application, it's important to note that the developers deduct a protocol fee of 0.04 TON from each mint transaction. This fee isn't related to gas charges. For instance, during a single transaction that mints '24 mints,' a total of 0.96 TON (0.04 TON per mint) is taken as a fee. This deduction is part of the transaction process and not just a quoted figure.
Recently, I conducted a test t…
🔩Bolt20 mint is completed and we are grateful to everyone for their contribution to our common goal. Now we are making preparations of our several activities, and if you don’t have anything to do, you can mint the fan token of the DEX 🌅 DeDust.io - the best exchange on the TON blockchain and with the warmest and sweetest community. And yes, by the way, there is $BOLT 🤫
https://tonano.io/ton20/dedust.io
✖️ Twitter
#bolt20 minting completed with 31,658 holders.
congratulation 🎉🎉🎉, minters.
ALSO, PLEASE STOP MINTING #BLOT20 NOW. ONCE MINTING COMPLETED, YOUR GAS FEE WILL BE WASTED. WE STILL SAW TX BEING SUBMITTED TO MINT #BOLT20 SECOND AGO (WAY TOO LATE) 😅
tweet
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @BoltTon20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👋Survey time.
Who is the next to list on market place?
$Bolt35%
$Durov15%
$Tongpt35%
$Tons16%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2023 to 29 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@BoltTon20 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tonano_announcement named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@tonshardmarket named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bolt ton-20” (@BoltTon20), 145 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoltTon20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
