Opus 5.5 is the one to use now. Fable-class work at ~40% less than Opus 5. Faster, tighter, cache reads at $0.20. Thinking always on. Switch. claude-opus-5-5

Channel
Dr. Doge πΆ Field Notes from 2013
@DrAwesomeDoge
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
31,462subscribers
-4,935 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001577698207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrAwesomeDoge |
| Description | What an old crypto dev is watching, thinking, or panicking about this week. πͺ BTC since 2013 π TON dev since 2021 π Survived Mt. Gox, FTX, 3 bear markets Pattern recognition you can't buy. Stay paranoid. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrAwesomeDoge |
Topic
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 31,462 | -24 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 31,486 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 31,507 | -46 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 31,553 | -34 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 31,587 | -78 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 31,665 | -76 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 31,741 | -27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 31,768 | -54 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 31,822 | -149 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:08 | 31,971 | -304 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 32,275 | -44 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 32,319 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 32,337 | +39 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 32,298 | -542 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 32,840 | -454 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 33,294 | -399 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 33,693 | -87 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 33,780 | -466 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 34,246 | -493 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 34,739 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 0.536%
- avg views Γ· 31,462 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 169
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.89%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (27 May 2026 β 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 337 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 20:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 73
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 95
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 22 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
345 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 133 | 38.6% | |
| π | 77 | 22.3% | |
| π₯ | 41 | 11.9% | |
| π | 28 | 8.12% | |
| π | 11 | 3.19% | |
| β | 10 | 2.90% | |
| π | 10 | 2.90% | |
| π€ | 9 | 2.61% | |
| π | 5 | 1.45% | |
| β‘ | 4 | 1.16% | |
| π± | 4 | 1.16% | |
| π€― | 4 | 1.16% | |
| π | 2 | 0.58% | |
| π© | 2 | 0.58% | |
| π | 2 | 0.58% | |
| π | 1 | 0.29% | |
| π’ | 1 | 0.29% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 0.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 12
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 21 we hold a reading for Β· 29%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @DrAwesomeDoge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
https://www.anthropic.com/claude-fable-and-mythos-5-1
π3
π’ TON Network Update July 13: What You Need to Know A mandatory software update is scheduled for Monday, July 13 at 10:00 UTC for both validators and full node operators. What is this about? This is the next step of TON's "Sub-Second" upgrade program the ongoing rollout of Catchain 2.0, the new consensus protocol designed to cut block finality from ~2.5 seconds down to 200β400 milliseconds. Based on the current β¦
π10π€4β€2
π€ How TON is getting ready for heavier loads β«οΈ In just an hour, the network will begin voting on a new set of validator upgrades. Ahead of the vote, Dr. Awesome Doge published a detailed breakdown of what is changing β so weβll recap the key points. β«οΈ If Aprilβs upgrade was about making transactions faster, Juneβs is about something less exciting but no less important: keeping the network stable under heavy load.β¦
β€4π3
Posted without readable text
π11β€7π4π2π©2
In China, there is a significant date referred to as "May 35th." Typically, on this day or the two days surrounding it, VPNs experience large-scale disconnections and loss of signal. Are you all prepared to assess whether your VPN is sufficiently stable to remain functional during this period? π‘
β6
You already let AI summarize your docs and your unread chats. The catch: to pull that off, your private files get uploaded to some company's AI, which can read them, train on them, and profile you. At Blockchain Life in Dubai, Durov told the story of how π€ COCOON was born to break that trade. A decentralized network on TON where GPU owners rent out compute for TON, and your data gets processed inside a sealed box evβ¦
β€6π€5π3
After the Titanic hit the iceberg, the passengers stayed aboard for almost two hours. They were sure it couldn't sink. The lifeboats rowed away half empty. Durov opened his Oslo Freedom Forum talk with that image, then said the ship of personal freedom has already hit the iceberg, and most of us haven't noticed we're sinking. He laid out the tricks moving from East to West: thousands arrested in the UK over social β¦
β€10π2π2
πYour 10 TON will soon show as 10 GRAM. The most important line first: you don't need to do anything. Telegram is renaming TON's token from Toncoin to Gram, ticker TON to GRAM. It's only a name change. The chain stays TON, and your balance, addresses, and contracts don't move. No swap, no migration, no claim. Anything telling you to "swap TON for GRAM" or "claim your GRAM" is a scam. But Gram is no ordinary name. Iβ¦
β€8π€―3π2
Posted without readable text
β€23π11β‘2π1π₯°1
πͺYour TON has been jobless since the day you bought it. Time to send it to work: 1. Drop your TON into KTON (we file the paperwork) 2. You get π± KTON back as proof your TON is now gainfully employed 3. KTON deploys your TON to PoS validators across the TON network 4. You stay on the couch. The paycheck arrives anyway. Currently around 16% APY. Fluctuates like any honest job market. Your idle TON earns 0% APY. Indeβ¦
π2β€1π1
π€ April's "TON got faster" made the headlines. But fast was never the finish line. The real test is the moment a project blows up and everyone rushes in at the same second, whether the chain holds up in the jam. This week TON did two things: on June 1 every validator installed new software, and on June 3 they vote on-chain on whether to switch on the new abilities inside it. None of it is a slogan, but it's what deβ¦
π₯10π5
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @DrAwesomeDoge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βDr. Doge πΆ Field Notes from 2013β (@DrAwesomeDoge), 31,462 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrAwesomeDoge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.