International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,170–53,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 05:00
53,385
+7
19 Sept 2026, 08:16
53,378
-10
16 Sept 2026, 23:19
53,388
+32
14 Sept 2026, 22:39
53,356
+4
13 Sept 2026, 07:59
53,352
+5
11 Sept 2026, 11:59
53,347
+2
8 Sept 2026, 18:22
53,345
+27
5 Sept 2026, 14:20
53,318
+25
3 Sept 2026, 17:16
53,293
+17
2 Sept 2026, 07:12
53,276
-2
1 Sept 2026, 07:27
53,278
+25
31 Aug 2026, 05:47
53,253
+9
30 Aug 2026, 03:16
53,244
+5
29 Aug 2026, 06:04
53,239
-2
28 Aug 2026, 02:46
53,241
-4
26 Aug 2026, 23:18
53,245
-5
26 Aug 2026, 00:53
53,250
+17
24 Aug 2026, 21:19
53,233
+9
23 Aug 2026, 06:45
53,224
+7
21 Aug 2026, 19:06
53,217
first reading
Engagement
377 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.26%
avg views ÷ 53,385 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,870
206 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
206
of 377 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
377 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
797,882
Reactions total
11,321
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 18:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,700
Videos
≈9,210
Links
≈14,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 18m
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 337 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,395 reactions across 366 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,939
25.5%
🔥
3,675
18.9%
💩
2,592
13.4%
🤡
1,640
8.46%
🤣
1,214
6.26%
🤬
731
3.77%
👎
495
2.55%
🤮
434
2.24%
❤🔥
418
2.16%
👏
383
1.97%
👍
349
1.80%
🫡
308
1.59%
🥰
305
1.57%
🖕
276
1.42%
🏆
235
1.21%
🌚
195
1.01%
😁
186
0.959%
🍌
170
0.877%
🤯
98
0.505%
🙈
96
0.495%
27 further kinds
656
3.38%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 377 of the 377 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,865 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 377 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
73
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 377 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @war_noir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 377 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#Mali 🇲🇱: Al-Qaeda in Sahel (#JNIM) carried out an attack on a Malian Army camp in Djenné, Mopti Region.
Militants captured large quantities of weapons & materials — including a very rare E.C.M.K “Pistolet Mitrailleur modèle 89-1A” (PM89-1A) assault rifle made by #Algeria 🇩🇿.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103897731097911430
#Ethiopia 🇪🇹: Amhara FANO National Movement (AFNM) reportedly ambushed Ethiopian Army (ENDF) convoy in North Shewa Zone.
One of the FANO fighters seems to be armed with a rare Israeli IMI “Romat” (Rov've Mitta'enn) battle rifle — which was very likely seized from ENDF.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103881441188683987
A new video posted by the “Baloch Nationalist Army” — operates in #Balochistan Regions of #Pakistan 🇵🇰 and #Iran 🇮🇷.
Fighers have a quite rare #Poland-made 🇵🇱 FB Radom PM-63 “RAK” submachine gun in addition to Type 3 AKS-47 rifle and Beretta M9/92FS pistol.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103866661883314464
#Yemen / #SaudiArabia 🇾🇪🇸🇦: Ansar Allah (#Houthis) struck Main Battle Tanks (likely Saudi-supplied M60A1 or similar MBT) and vehicles used by PLC Forces.
Group apparently used common “Rajoum” Hexacopter Drones armed with Air-Dropped Iranian DIO M48 HE and locally-made Bombs.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103841873315946621
#Ethiopia 🇪🇹: Fighters affiliated with the “Tigray Defense Forces” conducting shooting drills with PK variants.
Fighters notably using uncommon #Azerbaijan-made 🇦🇿 “UP-7.62” machine guns as well — various Azerbaijani weapons and ammo have been supplied to the #ENDF for several years, and a portion of them has been captured by various factions.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103816695315861819
#Myanmar 🇲🇲: Kachin Independence Army (#KIA) destroys a military vessel on Ayeyarwady River during the recent waves of attacks.
Group used a Drone armed with an Air-Dropped Improvised (locally-made) High-explosive Bomb.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103696430946746802
#Mexico 🇲🇽: “Los Chapitos” Cartel (CDS/CH) drone-bombed a rival member of the “Mayo Faction” (CDS/MF) in #Sinaloa.
CDS/CH used a very common DJI Drone with Improvised Air-Dropped Grenade; which seems to be inefficient — rival cartel member was wounded but managed to run away.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103644702427750654
#Pakistan 🇵🇰: Tehrik-e #Taliban Pakistan (#TTP) carried out an attack on Pakistani Post and shot down a Quadcopter Drone in Mohmand.
Militants used PKM machine gun, AKM pattern assault rifles and unidentified rifle (likely M4 / M16A4) with InfiRay / Longot Thermal scope + LRF.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103605705588559935
#France 🇫🇷: An illegal arms dealer selling a quite interesting “Mauser” rifle on the French black market in #Paris.
The rifle is a “Gewehr 24(t)” rifle — it was originally produced in 1941 by 'Waffenwerke Brunn' at Považská Bystrica plant during the occupation of Czechoslovakia.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103562826157527285
#Sudan 🇸🇩: Sudanese Forces (#SAF) captured the town of Sowdari in North Kordofan from Rapid Support Forces (#RSF).
One of the SAF fighters is apparently armed with a notable 35mm QLZ-87 / “ABBA” automatic grenade launcher with DFJ87 HEDP grenades.
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103545900945567983
#Pakistan 🇵🇰: Tehrik-e #Taliban Pakistan (#TTP) militants attacked a Pakistani Army post in #MirAli, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
The militant was armed with a #USA-made 🇺🇸 M24 SWS sniper rifle (most likely sourced from ANA / Afghan stocks).
https://x.com/war_noir/status/2103520235819016498
🔥20😁3👎2😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 377 posts we hold for @war_noir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela @BellumActaNews · 114,627#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
/r/CombatFootage @r_combatfootage · 24,956 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 September 2026
POPULAR FRONT @POPULARXFRONT · 31,217 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela @BellumActaNews · 114,627 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Clash Report @ClashReport · 109,374 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Tabz - Live News @tabzlive · 66,427 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
The Observers @contlictobservers · 45,527 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
frontier_conflict @frontier_conflict1 · 25,534 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
Geopolitics Watch @GeoPWatch · 80,557 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Gimbaled @gimbaled · 44,837 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 3 September 2026
Global News Monitor @warmonitors · 152,372 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸 @rnintel · 170,796 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
The Defender Dome @DefenderDome · 21,482 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
NetBlocks @netblocks · 48,809 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Real News No Bullshit @RNNBS · 21,251 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 September 2026
Our Wars, Today @ourwarstoday · 46,938 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 390,258 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES @middle_east_spectator · 404,635 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
ProjectLeaflet @TheLeaflet · 27,791 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
War Leaks 18+ (Channel) @warleaks11 · 68,456 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
WarFront Witness @wfwitness · 81,256 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
OsntTV 📺️ @OsntTV · 46,401 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
⚠️ ARMAPEDIA - NOTICIAS EN VIVO - SIN CENSURA @armapedia · 177,716 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Mannie's War Room @manniefabian · 24,176 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Lebanese News and Updates @LebUpdate · 77,232 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“War Noir” (@war_noir), 53,385 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/war_noir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.