https://t.me/tabzlive/97715 사우디와 파키스탄의 상호방위조약에 튀르키예도 가세해 이제는 삼중방위조약이 만들어 졌습니다. 이스라엘과 이란이 함부로 손을 쓰지 못할 것 같네요.

Channel
흰토끼 해외뉴스
@rabbitQoverseas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,323subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001194314191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rabbitQoverseas |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rabbitQoverseas |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 2,323 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 2,320 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 2,321 | first reading |
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.37%
- avg views ÷ 2,323 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 125
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,243 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://t.me/tabzlive/97631 "곧 전쟁이 끝날 것 같아" 다 날려버릴 것처럼 하다가 타협으로 선회했으니, 이제는 그 반대로 빈사 상태로 만들어버릴 속셈일까요??
https://t.me/rnintel/65400 후티 반군은 계속해서 사우디발 화물선 등에 공격을 가하는 중입니다.
https://t.me/Visegrad_24/11026 예비 불체자들이 또 한번 제2의 세우타 사태를 만들려 공모하고 있다는 소식이랍니다.
https://t.me/rnintel/65394 작년 필리핀 순찰선과의 마찰 사태로 해안경비대원 2명이 사망했음을 드디어 공식 인정한 중국
https://t.me/BellumActaNews/176187 대만은 한광훈련으로 중국의 침공에 대비하고, 우리는 북한에게 어서옵셔~ 하고 길을 열어주는 중
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/146441 마샤 블랙번, 테네지 주지사 공화당 예비선거 승리
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/146382 존 튠은 토드 블랜치 법무장관 인준 투표는 당연하고, SAVE America 법안 투표도 열릴 수 있도록 해야 합니다.
🇺🇸🗳 지금 트럼프가 이스라엘을 지지한다고 실망하는 유권자들이 나오면, 그에 대한 대한으로 '민주당'을 외치는 좌파들이 참 많습니다. 3년 전 가자지구 전쟁이 일어났을 때 누구보다 이스라엘 편을 들어준 정당이 민주당이라는 사실은 까맣게 잊은 채로 말이죠.
https://t.me/CIG_telegram/81800 워싱턴포스트 등 주류 언론이 싫어서 트럼프에게 갔다가, 트럼프에 실망해서 대안으로 끌고 온 것이 또 워싱턴포스트 입니다.
https://t.me/freedomforcebattalion/105033 많이 들으셨겠지만 이제부터 미국 원정출산이 금지됩니다.
https://t.me/ConservativeBrief/31414 트럼프 "내가 헤그세스를 마음에 들어 하지 않는다는 보도는 가짜뉴스"
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @rabbitQoverseas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 365,837 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SGTnewsNetwork · 112,7795 postsRerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 178,3204 postsMelissa Redpill - Freedom Force Battalion 🇺🇸
@freedomforcebattalion · 78,4503 posts/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 116,6562 postsTabz - Live News
@tabzlive · 63,7112 postsVisegrad24
@Visegrad_24 · 16,3752 postsWarFront Witness
@wfwitness · 82,9552 postsBellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 115,8401 postBRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,7761 postMJTruth
@candlesinthenight · 95,1671 postConservative Brief
@ConservativeBrief · 56,4951 postGeopolitics Watch
@GeoPWatch · 80,9521 postLive: Ukraine
@liveukraine_media · 43,0411 postOSINTWarfare
@OSINTWarfare · 6,1351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rabbitQoverseas named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“흰토끼 해외뉴스” (@rabbitQoverseas), 2,323 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rabbitQoverseas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.