Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PlaneNerd Archive

@planenerd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,901subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002031601958
TypeChannel
Username@planenerd
DescriptionAn archive of posts for extremely autistic and in-depth analysis of Planes and Air warfare. From a Pakistani Perspective. DM @Stonehenge_Railgun for Ads. Affiliated with: @medmannews @gasalarm @ThePakistanNews
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/planenerd

Growth

4,8994,9014,9006 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,900 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,901 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,899–4,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:274,901+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:424,900+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:024,899first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.9%
avg views ÷ 4,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held35 (10 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total39,610
Reactions total627
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,390
Videos
857
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

927 reactions across 35 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16117.4%
😭14415.5%
😁11912.8%
❤‍🔥10010.8%
🔥9710.5%
👍646.90%
🫡464.96%
😎434.64%
💔333.56%
💯303.24%
👌252.70%
👀222.37%
😈111.19%
🥰101.08%
😨80.863%
🤩50.539%
🤯50.539%
😢20.216%
10.108%
💋10.108%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 927reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 35 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @planenerd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC335 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThePakistanNewsVideo

⚡🇸🇾/🇮🇱 — NEW: Israel is closely monitoring the "rebuilding" of the Syrian Air Force. Reports are that Syrians have started the recruitment of pilots, training, and a first exercise with old fighter jets (Su-22) in northern Syria. @ThePakistanNews

😁71🤯1

Signed LazyKirk12

10 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC441 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @PakiSchizophreniaVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🤩5

10 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC573 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

While Algerians already acquired 5th Gen fighters, su35 and now will have a whole new chinese squadron if this deal is successful. There is another Air force that spent 7 fucking years waiting for vipers. I wonder what kind of mental illness Moroccan Airforce has.

😭24

Signed LazyKirk12

10 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,110 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️🇩🇿🇨🇳 Algeria is negotiating the purchase of 30 J10C Fighter jets in the next 15 years, according to Algerian media the negotiations are advanced and positive. If this deal goes Algeria will have the strongest Air force in North Africa. @planenerd

❤‍🔥162

Signed LazyKirk12

10 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC568 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Syrian Air force recieved multiple attack Helicopters and SU-22 strike fighters. Basically they were planes and helis that were abandoned by their pilots in Cyprus and Jordan bcs the syrian pilots refused Assad orders to bomb civilians during the civil war. Russia did not give any new airframes to syria.

👍16

Signed LazyKirk12

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC520 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mena_LiveVideo

/Syrian Air Force Military Training @Mena_Live

8

Signed LazyKirk12

9 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC506 views24 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sigintreports

🇵🇰🇸🇦 Pakistani and Saudi Arabian ISR drones are monitoring the Saudi-Yemeni border region.

❤‍🔥11👀8😭3😁2

Signed LazyKirk12

9 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC689 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Houthis attacked saudi oil facilities tonight. No sign of Turkey or Pakistan bombing the houthies as everyone expected.

🔥227😁7

Signed LazyKirk12

8 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC787 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️🇮🇷🇮🇱 I forgot something that happened this week, it seems Iranians managed to recover a mostly intact Israeli Hermes drone. Many Iranians claim it was due to EW they achieved this which in reality is fully possible bcs they did the same with American drones decade ago. @planenerd

❤‍🔥214

Signed LazyKirk12

8 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC713 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Did They strap a rocket engine to a JDAM and called it low cost cruise missile ?

😁22🔥2

Signed LazyKirk12

8 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC661 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @NAOSINT12Photo

❗️🇺🇸🇲🇦 Moroccan Royal Armed Forces And US AFCOM successfully tested a low cost long range cruise missile in the shooting range of cape deraa. @NAOSINT12

🔥6

Signed LazyKirk12

7 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC653 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThePakistanNewsPhoto

⚡🇦🇺🇮🇳 — The Royal Australian Air Force uploaded pictures of Indian Air Force's Rafales, which arrived in Australia for joint exercises. None of the Rafales had their number markings, all were stripped. Since India hasn't received any new Rafale aircraft, this must be the old fleet, then why were the markings removed? Official Post @ThePakistanNews

😁211

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @planenerd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 178,103 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 385,979
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 178,397
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Global News Monitor
@warmonitors · 155,446
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PlaneNerd Archive” (@planenerd), 4,901 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planenerd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.