Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for News from Sudan

Channel

News from Sudan

@NewsfromSudan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,072subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002139768574
TypeChannel
Username@NewsfromSudan
DescriptionAn independent initiative founded in 2024 to document human rights abuses in Sudan. Second channel: @NewsFromKashmir
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NewsfromSudan

Growth

15,07215,16015,1167 August 2026 — 15,160 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,155 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,147 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,132 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,121 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,105 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,095 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,076 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,072 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,059–15,173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:5715,072-4
14 Aug 2026, 14:3315,076-19
13 Aug 2026, 05:3315,095-10
12 Aug 2026, 08:2415,105-16
11 Aug 2026, 04:5115,121-11
10 Aug 2026, 05:4115,132-15
9 Aug 2026, 05:0215,147-8
8 Aug 2026, 04:5815,155-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:4615,160first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.72%
avg views ÷ 15,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
861
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held33 (25 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total28,427
Reactions total478
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
909
Videos
502
Links
204

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
56s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

478 reactions across 33 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14831.0%
💔12025.1%
🤬8517.8%
❤‍🔥296.07%
👍296.07%
😢173.56%
🕊153.14%
🤯132.72%
👏112.30%
👎40.837%
🔥30.628%
20.418%
😁10.209%
🫡10.209%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 478reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC538 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩: At least 18 civilians were killed and 17 wounded after the RSF attacked Um Arada, roughly 25 km southwest of El Obeid in North Kordofan. More than 300 families were forced to flee on foot. Witnesses said RSF fighters shot men attempting to escape and subjected fleeing civilians to beatings and death threats. Health authorities say 23 unaccompanied children, including infants, were later reunited after reachi

🤬7😢4💔1

15 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC523 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

⚠️‼️We welcome you to follow the Khaybar News Network, an international coalition of channels that support and showcase current affairs, events, updates and analysis on the Axis of Resistance. 🇸🇾 ⬜ ⚪ ⬛ 🇧🇦 🌟🌟 ⚫ 🎥 🌟 🌟 🟨 🎭 🌟 🌟 🇮🇷 🌐 🌟 🌐 🌟 😏 🌟🌟🌟 🇾🇪 🔥 🔲 😁 KNN brings you a global alliance spanning a number of languages and represents multiple communities, all of whom are unified in their support for Palestine, the Isla

2🤬2

15 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC589 views14 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩: RSF Attack on Umm Arada, North Kordofan The RSF attacked Umm Arada, southwest of El Obeid, killing more than 14 civilians and injuring dozens, according to preliminary information. The attack has also triggered mass displacement amid worsening humanitarian conditions #Sudan @NewsFromSudan

🤬102💔2

14 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC607 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩: Heavy fighting and artillery fire erupted outside El Obeid in North Kordofan as the Sudanese army and the paramilitary RSF clashed southwest of the city. The escalation follows recent battles along the vital Exports Road corridor. #Sudan @NewsFromSudan

10🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC689 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩: The Sudan Doctors Network announces the martyrdom of two individuals and the injury of others inside the emergency department of Al-Obeid Hospital in North Kordofan State, due to the hospital being exposed to shrapnel from a drone launched by the Rapid Support Forces militia on the city yesterday, Wednesday. #Sudan @NewsFromSudan

💔8🤬5😢2

13 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC760 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩🔴 DISPLACED FAMILIES IN KORDOFAN EATING ANIMAL FEED TO SURVIVE Humanitarian workers in West Kordofan say hunger has become so severe that some displaced families are surviving on ambaz, the sesame and groundnut residue normally used as animal feed. A malwa of millet has reportedly reached SDG 20,000, while incomes have collapsed and aid remains extremely limited. One emergency team arrived with food for 100 fam

🕊10💔2🤯2😢2

13 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC643 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩🔴: Sudanese army and Joint Forces repelled a major RSF assault on the strategic town of Jabrat al-Shaikh in North Kordofan on Thursday, destroying dozens of vehicles and capturing around 60 others, military sources told Sudan Tribune. #Sudan @NewsFromSudan

9👏42🫡1

11 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC892 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩 Food prices surge as North Darfer crisis deepens Food and consumer prices in Omdurman have risen sharply, with residents reporting increases of 20–25% in one month and some essentials climbing by more than 40%. In El Malha, North Darfur, the situation is even more severe. Markets are reportedly running out of grain and basic goods, transport routes have been disrupted, and families are being forced to sell liv

9😢2🤯1

11 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC700 views14 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

— 🇸🇩: Former Senior RSF Commander hospitalized in military custody Former senior RSF commander Lt. Gen. Ali Al-Naseeh Al-Qala has been transferred to a military hospital in Omdurman after his health severely deteriorated in detention, according to his family. Al-Qala, a founding RSF figure and former head of operations, has been held by Sudanese military intelligence since January 2025, when the army recaptured the

11👍3

11 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC604 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩: RSF-SPLM-N Alliance attacks Geisan in Blue Nile Heavy fighting erupted in Geisan, Blue Nile, after an alliance of the RSF and SPLM-N launched an assault on the border town, according to local officials. RSF fighters reportedly reached Geisan’s main market, where local media said they looted shops and opened fire on civilians, while the Sudanese army and allied forces fought to repel the attack. Sudanese auth

6👎3

11 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC629 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

— 🇸🇩: RSF blockade worsens cholera crisis in North Kordofan The humanitarian situation in Al-Mazroub, North Kordofan, is rapidly deteriorating as an RSF blockade restricts food, medical supplies and civilian movement amid a worsening cholera outbreak. Al-Mazroub Hospital is reportedly receiving around 20 cholera and acute watery diarrhoea cases daily. Health authorities previously recorded roughly 600 cases and 21

💔62🤬2🕊1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @NewsfromSudan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,227 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“News from Sudan” (@NewsfromSudan), 15,072 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewsfromSudan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.