Channel
@Faytuks_Network
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,593subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003758686075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Faytuks_Network |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Faytuks_Network |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,593 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 1,589 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,591 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 1,591 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,428 |
| Reactions total | 137 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 29 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 34 | 24.8% | |
| 🙏 | 26 | 19.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 12.4% | |
| 👻 | 12 | 8.76% | |
| 🤮 | 12 | 8.76% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 8.03% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The U.S. Senate passed the sanctions legislation 86-11, and it will now move to the House. Faytuks Network (@FaytuksNetwork) Russia sanctions: Senate Dems hotlined a deal that would tee up votes on amendments from Sens. Warnock and Cassidy to tweak the bill's tariff language, and Sens. Paul and Wyden to scrap the bill's tariffs entirely. Sen. Warnock was the final holdout. The GOP cleared the hotline, while it's unc…
https://www.reuters.com/world/what-is-patriot-missile-system-why-are-supplies-depleted-worldwide-2026-08-07/
The U.S., in turn, approved the sale of 5,250 interceptors to Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates for replenishment. - Reuters Faytuks Network (@FaytuksNetwork) CSIS assessments indicate Saudi Arabia burned through roughly 86% of its 2,800 PAC-3 interceptors within the first 38 days of combat, leaving Saudi Arabia with only about 400 missiles left in April. Other Gulf nations experienced comparabl…
CSIS assessments indicate Saudi Arabia burned through roughly 86% of its 2,800 PAC-3 interceptors within the first 38 days of combat, leaving Saudi Arabia with only about 400 missiles left in April. Other Gulf nations experienced comparable depletion rates, according to Reuters.
https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/08/severing-irans-illicit-cash-pipeline/
🙏1
The U.S. Department of the Treasury targeted a network of currency exchange houses and shell companies used by Iran to secretly move funds and access oil revenues through the international financial system, marking the U.S.'s eighth action in 2026 targeting Iran's shadow banking apparatus.
🙏1
The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) says three of its vessels were attacked by missiles and drones this week in the Strait of Hormuz, in a statement issued by the company.
🙏1
Six suspicious drone flights were observed over the Bundeswehr’s "Patriot-Werft" maintenance facility and underground logistics depot in Mechernich between 22:00 and 05:00 on the night leading into Friday. The Patriot-Werft is Europe's sole facility responsible for maintaining and repairing Patriot air defense systems. - Tagesschau
🙏1
Italy has rejected Spain's ultimatum, stating it will not bow to "ultimatums or impositions" and will maintain border checks on arrivals from Spain until at least August 15. Italy insisted the measures will remain until it confirms there are no security, terrorism, or irregular migration risks stemming from the enclave.
❤4😁1
The U.S. naval blockade halted Iranian crude exports, leaving Iran's primary export hub at Kharg Island completely idle since July 31. Satellite data confirms all loading bays are empty, though Iran continues collecting revenue from previously dispatched Asian shipments while quietly cutting domestic production to avoid storage overflow - FT
The U.S. Department of War released its fifth batch of UAP files. It contains 513 MB of videos and 130 MB of documents. The files can be viewed at https://www.war.gov/UFO/.
❤1🤣1🙏1
https://x.com/MarcACaputo/status/2085686460489896012?s=20 Marc Caputo (@MarcACaputo) “No escape:" Inside Rubio's pressure campaign against Cuba At least 40 entities & 38 people have been sanctioned since Jan. 2026, crushing Cuba’s communist economy & creating some capitalist opportunities (especially US fuel exporters)
❤1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @Faytuks_Network. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 853,442 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Faytuks_Network named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Faytuks Network” (@Faytuks_Network), 1,593 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Faytuks_Network.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.