Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AD Geopolitics

Channel

AD Geopolitics

@adGeopolitics

Not marked by Telegram, checked 19 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,619subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232551074
TypeChannel
Username@adGeopolitics
DescriptionSva dešavanja u svetu. Dostupno na srpskom i engleskom jeziku. Hvala na podršci. All events in the world. Available in Serbian and English. Thank you for your support.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/adGeopolitics

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@webtribune/277024 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC@adGeopolitics/22865 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC1.004 minutes
@webtribune/277054 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC@adGeopolitics/22868 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC0.95under a minute
@webtribune/278058 Nov 2026, 19:31 UTC@adGeopolitics/22966 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC0.862 minutes
@webtribune/2607417 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@adGeopolitics/21297 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC0.832 minutes
@webtribune/2617524 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC@adGeopolitics/21406 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC0.812 minutes
@webtribune/2597511 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC@adGeopolitics/21210 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC0.782 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@webtribune39 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.852 minutes@webtribune (39–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 39 of the 39 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 530 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,55712,73712,6477 August 2026 — 12,685 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,732 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,737 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,725 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,712 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,709 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,708 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,709 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,712 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,705 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,706 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,726 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,715 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,713 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,714 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,713 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,717 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,723 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,722 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,725 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,724 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,723 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,718 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,710 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,695 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,698 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,696 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,692 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,680 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,682 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,640 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,623 subscribers12 October 2026 — 12,602 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,589 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,581 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,579 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,581 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,580 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,574 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,564 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,563 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,565 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,568 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,565 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,567 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,562 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,557 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,564 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,607 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,608 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,605 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,597 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,593 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,601 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,610 subscribers9 November 2026 — 12,612 subscribers11 November 2026 — 12,619 subscribers12,6197 August 202611 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 97 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,530–12,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:4012,619+7
9 Nov 2026, 22:4912,612+2
8 Nov 2026, 13:4612,610+9
7 Nov 2026, 08:4512,601+8
5 Nov 2026, 03:1612,593-4
4 Nov 2026, 05:2512,597-8
3 Nov 2026, 07:1712,605-3
2 Nov 2026, 09:4912,608+1
1 Nov 2026, 12:2112,607+43
31 Oct 2026, 10:3512,564+7
30 Oct 2026, 09:1812,557-5
29 Oct 2026, 09:4012,562-5
28 Oct 2026, 04:3812,567+2
27 Oct 2026, 06:5712,565-3
26 Oct 2026, 03:2612,568+3
25 Oct 2026, 06:1112,565+2
23 Oct 2026, 00:4612,563-1
22 Oct 2026, 00:3112,564-10
20 Oct 2026, 19:4912,574-6
19 Oct 2026, 20:2012,580first reading

Engagement

630 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.25%
avg views ÷ 12,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
537
223 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
223
of 630 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 218 of 223 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held630 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total119,655
Reactions total1,251
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,890
Videos
≈7,540
Links
≈9,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,513 reactions across 610 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,80132.7%
❤1,20521.9%
🤬4518.18%
🔥3686.68%
💩3316.00%
🤔3175.75%
😱1843.34%
😁1482.68%
👏1152.09%
🍾891.61%
💯851.54%
🤣681.23%
👎671.22%
🤮571.03%
😢350.635%
😡320.58%
🥴290.526%
🙏260.472%
🥰160.29%
🤡130.236%
18 further kinds761.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 611 of the 630 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,513 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 630 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 630 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adGeopolitics. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 630 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 223 posts held from the last 30 days (0.897%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 20:21 UTC224 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Dok je Rusija pregovarala, stigao je NATO: Specijalne snage su iskrcane, lansirane rakete Kalibr! Dok se pažnja međunarodne javnosti usmerava na mirovne pregovore o Ukrajini, u baltičkom regionu odvijaju se vojna pomeranja i pripreme koje u Moskvi izazivaju sve ozbiljniju zabrinutost. https://webtribune.rs/dok-je-rusija-pregovarala-stigao-je-nato-specijalne-snage-su-iskrcane-lansirane-rakete-kalibr/

🔥2😱2

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC237 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Iza pregovora u Abu Dabiju krije se surova istina: Iščenko otkrio ko odlučuje o sudbini Ukrajine Pregovori Rusije, SAD i Ukrajine u Abu Dabiju otvorili su pitanje mogućeg završetka sukoba, ali iza diplomatskih razgovora kriju se duboka neslaganja koja bi mogla da odrede njegov dalji tok. Opširnije na: https://www.borba.info/2026/11/12/iza-pregovora-u-abu-dabiju-krije-se-surova-istina-iscenko-otkrio-ko-odlucuje-o-su…

😱2

Signed Vlada

12 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC255 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ruska PVO prvi put presrela novo američko oružje: Sukob ulazi u opasnu fazu! Tri događaja koja su se gotovo istovremeno našla u središtu pažnje vojnih analitičara ukazuju na ozbiljne promene u odnosima Rusije i Zapada, dok se mogućnost brzog diplomatskog rešenja sve više udaljava. https://webtribune.rs/ruska-pvo-prvi-put-presrela-novo-americko-oruzje-sukob-ulazi-u-opasnu-fazu/

🔥1

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 19:17 UTC297 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Putin šokirao američke pregovarače: Ako Evropa ovo uradi, mira neće biti! Pregovori Moskve i Vašingtona o Ukrajini dobili su dramatičan obrt nakon što je ruski predsednik Vladimir Putin američkim predstavnicima izneo upozorenje koje bi moglo da odredi sudbinu budućeg mirovnog sporazuma. Opširnije na: https://www.borba.info/2026/11/12/putin-sokirao-americke-pregovarace-ako-evropa-ovo-uradi-mira-nece-biti/

❤3

Signed Vlada

12 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC296 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Dramatičan preokret na frontu: Ruski prodor mogao bi da promeni tok rata! Ruske snage pojačale su pritisak na nekoliko ključnih pravaca fronta, dok se u Zaporoškoj oblasti i Donbasu odvijaju borbe koje bi mogle značajno da promene položaj ukrajinskih jedinica. https://webtribune.rs/dramatican-preokret-na-frontu-ruski-prodor-mogao-bi-da-promeni-tok-rata/

🔥1

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 18:41 UTC301 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Pretnja stiže iz dubina Arktika: Rusija ima oružje koje može da pogodi srce Amerike! Iz dubina Arktika stiže signal koji je izazvao novu uznemirenost u NATO, dok ruska podvodna flota sve intenzivnije deluje u vodama dalekog severa. https://webtribune.rs/pretnja-stize-iz-dubina-arktika-rusija-ima-oruzje-koje-moze-da-pogodi-srce-amerike/

🔥2

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC320 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Moskva udara svakodnevno, ali cilj izmiče: Šlepčenko otkrio šta sprečava konačni slom! Ruski udari na ukrajinsku vojnu i energetsku infrastrukturu postaju sve učestaliji, ali pitanje njihovog stvarnog uticaja na tok sukoba ostaje otvoreno. Uprkos velikom broju pogođenih objekata i ozbiljnim oštećenjima, očekivani preokret na frontu izostaje. Zbog toga se sve češće postavlja pitanje da li dosadašnja strategija uopšte…

🤔2

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 18:13 UTC309 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Moskva prozrela veliku igru Vašingtona? Iza pregovora se krije mnogo veća igra Pregovori o završetku rata u Ukrajini ulaze u sve neizvesniju fazu, dok iza diplomatskih razgovora izranjaju geopolitički interesi koji bi mogli presudno da utiču na budućnost čitavog sukoba. Opširnije na: https://www.borba.info/2026/11/12/moskva-prozrela-veliku-igru-vasingtona-iza-pregovora-se-krije-mnogo-veca-igra/

🤔1

Signed Vlada

12 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC321 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Atentat potresao ruski vojni vrh: Ubijen ključni oficir- Opasnost preti iznutra?! Eksplozija koja je rano ujutru odjeknula u predgrađu Sankt Peterburga otvorila je nova pitanja o bezbednosti visokih ruskih oficira i načinu na koji se pripremaju napadi na njih. https://webtribune.rs/atentat-potresao-ruski-vojni-vrh-ubijen-kljucni-oficir-opasnost-preti-iznutra/

🔥2

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 17:14 UTC360 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Počelo je na ostrvu Kešm: Amerika otvara put za masovne udare na Iran! Situacija na Bliskom istoku ponovo se zaoštrava, a poslednji potezi američke vojske ukazuju na mogućnost ozbiljne eskalacije sukoba sa Iranom. Istovremeno, diplomatski pokušaji da se pronađe rešenje ulaze u sve težu fazu, dok iz Teherana stižu upozorenja Vašingtonu o posledicama nastavka vojnih dejstava. https://webtribune.rs/pocelo-je-na-ostrvu…

🔥1

Signed Ivan

12 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC358 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Vašington sprema istorijski ustupak Moskvi: Ono što je Putin tražio sada je na pregovaračkom stolu Pregovori o Ukrajini u Abu Dabiju dobili su neočekivan pravac, a predlozi koji se razmatraju mogli bi da promene ne samo tok sukoba već i budućnost evropske bezbednosti. Opširnije na: https://www.borba.info/2026/11/12/vasington-sprema-istorijski-ustupak-moskvi-ono-sto-je-putin-trazio-sada-je-na-pregovarackom-stolu/

❤1

Signed Vlada

12 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC366 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Zalužni izneo mračnu prognozu: Ukrajina je samo uvod u mnogo veći sukob Sukob u Ukrajini mogao bi da bude samo jedan deo mnogo šireg procesa koji menja odnose između najvećih svetskih sila, a njegov završetak zavisiće od događaja koji daleko prevazilaze granice ove zemlje. Opširnije na: https://www.borba.info/2026/11/12/zaluzni-izneo-mracnu-prognozu-ukrajina-je-samo-uvod-u-mnogo-veci-sukob/

😱1

Signed Vlada

Showing the 12 most recent of 630 posts we hold for @adGeopolitics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @adGeopolitics as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

192.rs
@press192 · 26,576
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 September 2026
Исток инфо
@Istokinfo · 30,913
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
Нулта Тачка | Nulta Tačka
@nultatacka · 26,675
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Dejan Beric
@SrbijaRusija · 92,126
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
UKR LEAKS_srb
@ukr_leaks_srb · 43,047
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
БУНКЕР
@BunkerSrb · 24,292
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
InfoDefenseSERBIA
@InfoDefSERBIA · 19,712
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 September 2026
СЛОВЕНСКИ МЕДВЕД
@SLOVENSKIMEDVED · 40,035
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
Geopolitics Watch
@GeoPWatch · 79,887
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
ИСТОЧНА БУДУЋНОСТ
@istocnabuducnost · 33,670
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
Источни Фронт
@istocni_front · 65,513
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
The Defender Dome
@DefenderDome · 21,295
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
БУНТ је стање духа ☧
@buntcg · 75,944
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Tabz - Live News
@tabzlive · 69,588
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Принцип
@principshop · 20,268
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AD Geopolitics” (@adGeopolitics), 12,619 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adGeopolitics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.