Channel
@belt_app
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,328subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001675887198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @belt_app |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/belt_app |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 1,328 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 1,329 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 1,323 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 1,323 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (1 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 782 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
43 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 14 | 32.6% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 30.2% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Самый неожиданный герой нового Lyst Index : Massimo Dutti🤩 Пока внимание было приковано к привычным лидерам рейтинга по типу Dior и Chanel, именно Massimo Dutti совершил один из самых заметных рывков, впервые оказавшись в первой десятке. Для индустрии это гораздо более важный сигнал, чем может показаться на первый взгляд. Еще десять лет назад бренд считали слишком консервативным. Так например во время расцвета стрит…
❤4💔1🥰1
К слову, если вы еще вдруг не видели, то сегодня был опубликован новый LYST Index с рейтингом самых желанных брендов. LYST - один из самых авторитетных мировых рейтингов модной индустрии, который ежеквартально показывает самые востребованные бренды и вещи. Каждый квартал платформа Lyst публикует Lyst Index : рейтинг самых востребованных брендов и вещей в мире. Именно после его выхода индустрия начинает обсуждать, к…
❤2🔥2👍1
А еще кстати, на странице BELT MAGAZINE в BELT мы нашли огромный список из 20-ти фильмов о моде, разделенный на разные категории💔 Так что вы можете выбрать что-то и оттуда) Заходите и сохраняйте!
🔥4💔1🥰1🙏1
Понедельник почти закончился, а это значит что пора расслабиться) Если хочется отвлечься, но при этом не выпадать из fashion-контекста предлагаем вам посмотреть пять фильмов на ночь, которые редко попадают в популярные подборки. 1. Notebook on Cities and Clothes (1989). Вим Вендерс отправляется в Париж, чтобы снять документальный фильм о японском дизайнере Ёдзи Ямамото. В итоге получается не биография, а философски…
🥰2👍1👏1
Кстати, если кому-то вдруг интересно и хочется почитать что-то интересное на ночь, можете перейти в тгк редакции BELT MAGAZINE, там ребята подробно разбирают несколько архивных коллекций Джона Гальяно. А если вам вдруг хочется посмотреть и сохранить архивные фотографии с этих показов, то они уже есть у нас в приложении BELT. Dior Fall 2006 Couture: by John Galliano John Galliano Fall 1999 John Galliano ready-to-w…
❤3🔥2🤯1
Чьи работы вам ближе? Джона Гальяно или Ива Сен-Лорана
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сегодня Иву Сен-Лорану исполнилось бы 90 лет💔 За свою карьеру он подарил миру десятки культовых вещей, начиная от Le Smoking до платья Mondrian. Но, если задуматься, наследие Сен-Лорана измеряется совсем не количеством коллекций. Он изменил то, как женщины ощущают себя в одежде. Не случайно французский писатель и журналист Жан д'Ормессон однажды сказал, что Шанель дала женщинам свободу, а Сен-Лоран власть. Именно он…
🔥3❤2👌2
Но, объявление такой темы Met Gala 2027 не единственное событие на сегодня! Сегодня день рождения человека, без которого невозможно представить современную моду. Мы говорим об Иве-Сен-Лоране. Обычно, когда говорят об Иве Сен-Лоране, то обычно вспоминают знаменитый Le Smoking, сафари-жакеты, прозрачные блузы или например коллекцию, вдохновленную картинами Пита Мондриана. Но за этими революционными идеями стоял челов…
🔥3❤2🙏2❤🔥1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @belt_app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чьи работы вам ближе? Джона Гальяно или Ива Сен-Лорана
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 978,135 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BELT | Мода | Стиль” (@belt_app), 1,328 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belt_app.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.