Практические советы по стилю, интересные факты из мира моды и трендовые подборки.
По вопросам сотрудничества и рекламы обращаться к @agatamilonova
Страница включена в РКН
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b4e5290bcc8f520fa78bd9
Created
26 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
132 measurements spanning 98 days, net -13,159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152,921–170,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 132
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:56
154,895
-124
10 Nov 2026, 21:09
155,019
-69
10 Nov 2026, 10:20
155,088
-125
9 Nov 2026, 06:36
155,213
-25
9 Nov 2026, 00:18
155,238
-109
7 Nov 2026, 22:00
155,347
-33
7 Nov 2026, 17:00
155,380
-86
6 Nov 2026, 21:09
155,466
-43
6 Nov 2026, 14:17
155,509
-62
5 Nov 2026, 21:57
155,571
-32
5 Nov 2026, 15:56
155,603
-71
4 Nov 2026, 19:58
155,674
-61
4 Nov 2026, 12:29
155,735
-50
3 Nov 2026, 22:51
155,785
-51
3 Nov 2026, 11:18
155,836
-27
3 Nov 2026, 01:17
155,863
-69
2 Nov 2026, 08:36
155,932
-24
2 Nov 2026, 00:46
155,956
-86
1 Nov 2026, 10:14
156,042
-29
1 Nov 2026, 02:08
156,071
first reading
Engagement
305 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.28%
avg views ÷ 154,895 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,630
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 305 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
305 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
570,030
Reactions total
9,834
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 15:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,500
Videos
≈227
Links
≈897
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 11s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,178 reactions across 304 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21,828
58.7%
👍
6,980
18.8%
🔥
6,843
18.4%
👎
574
1.54%
😁
363
0.976%
🤩
258
0.694%
😱
146
0.393%
🎉
119
0.32%
😢
67
0.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 305 of the 305 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 305 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.656%
2 of 305 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
6,540
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,130
over 303 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcr9hdM
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2SDnjemu1Y7
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 305 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 86 posts held from the last 30 days (1.16%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Почему вы всегда ходите в одном и том же
В шкафу полно вещей, а вы опять в тех же джинсах и свитере? Просто с ними все ясно: удобно, нравится, не нужно утром думать, что к чему подходит. А у остальной одежды часто есть какое-нибудь «но»: к брюкам нужна другая обувь, блузку надо отпарить, юбка красивая, но с чем ее носить — пока непонятно. Вот они и ждут своего часа.
Попробуйте в свободный вечер достать одну такую в…
Правильный ответ — Б) Лаком для ногтей
В 1993 году Кристиан Лубутен рассматривал прототип туфель и никак не мог понять, чего ему не хватает. Рядом его ассистентка красила ногти красным лаком. Дизайнер позаимствовал флакон и покрыл лаком черную подошву.
Результат оказался именно таким, как он хотел: туфли сразу стали выглядеть эффектнее. Так обычный лак для ногтей помог придумать красную подошву, по которой теперь у…
Сколько времени дизайнеры работают над одной коллекцией?
Вы посмотрели показ за 15 минут, а команда готовилась к нему несколько месяцев. Единого срока нет: многое зависит от дома и самой коллекции. Например, Джонатан Андерсон рассказывал, что в Loewe работу начинали примерно за полгода, причем около месяца уходило только на поиск идей.
Дальше — ткани, эскизы, первые образцы и примерки. И тут красивую задумку приход…
Лайфхак с прической
Всю жизнь заправляю волосы за уши, чтобы не лезли в лицо, а потом бешусь из-за заломов. Отучиться так и не смогла, зато нашла девушку, которая придумала, как красиво убрать волосы за уши. Теперь хочу попробовать сама💔
Почему у вас болят ноги в каблуках?
Туфли красивые, размер ваш, а через полчаса хочется их нафиг выкинуть, потому что ноги уже — все. Часто дело в посадке: узкий нос сдавливает пальцы, стопа съезжает вперед, а пятка выскакивает при каждом шаге. И вы весь вечер пытаетесь удержать туфли на ногах. Надеяться на «разносятся» здесь точно не стоит: если уже на примерке приходится поджимать пальцы, лучше попробовать другую …
Возможно ли одеться зимой стильно?
Прохладная погода — это не только холод, слякоть и бесформенная одежда. Даже в самые холодные дни можно выглядеть стильно, чувствовать себя уютно и оставаться в тепле. Все дело в правильной одежде!
Признаюсь, я сама недавно начала по-настоящему наслаждаться холодным временем года. Секрет прост: нужно одеваться тепло. Когда ты заботишься о себе, даже ветер, снег и дождь за окном не…
Цветовая шпаргалка
Если на улице холодно, то это не значит, что нужно похоронить яркие вещи в шкафу до следующих теплых деньков. Я считаю, что они классно могут смотреться и в ваших зимних образов!
Ловите вот шпаргалку по сочетанию сиреневого с другими оттенками ⬆️
Почему не надо гнаться за безупречностью?
Вот вы принарядились, понравились себе в зеркале — и тут начинается: а сумка точно подходит? А свитер лучше заправить? А вдруг с другими серьгами будет красивее? Через полчаса уже ничего не нравится. Я в такие моменты стараюсь остановиться: если мне удобно и я себе нравлюсь, можно просто выйти из дома. Не каждый образ нужно доводить до уровня съемки
Чуть помятая рубашка или…
Как научиться красиво подчеркивать свою фигуру?
▪️ Начните с того, что вам в себе нравится
Красивые плечи, ноги, ключицы, талия? Именно на них и делайте акцент. Подбирать одежду гораздо приятнее, когда думаешь, что хочется подчеркнуть.
▪️ Пробуйте разные длины
Иногда достаточно заправить футболку или чуть укоротить брюки, чтобы образ смотрелся совсем иначе. Примеряя вещь, посмотрите на себя в полный рост: так проще …
Находка дня: джинсы клеш
Вот на что я точно бы не пожалела денег, так это на новую пару качественных и стильных джинсов. Сейчас в тренде клеш, поэтому рекомендую рассмотреть покупке именно их!
На что лучше не тратить много денег во время шоппинга?
Я бы не спешила много тратить на вещи, которые пока непонятно, как носить. Например, вы всю жизнь ходили с большими сумками, а тут захотелось микро. Попробуйте сначала вариант подешевле: возможно, необходимость носить телефон в руке надоест уже через день. С непривычными фасонами и украшениями та же история — сначала разберитесь, удобно ли вам, а потом решайте, …
❤83👍33🔥10
Showing the 12 most recent of 305 posts we hold for @style. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Outfits @outfits · 203,686 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Русская мода @russianmoda · 189,437 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
World Fashion Channel @wfcru · 25,618 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Dresses @dresses · 48,248 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
Anita Gloss @anitagloss · 26,113 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 September 2026
Fresh Fashion @fashion · 131,572 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
STREET STYLE | Всё о стиле @streetstyle_looks · 31,505 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
Already Famous @alreadyfamous · 26,080 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
Раздетый стилист Лена Червова @elennne_style · 99,418 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Хот Кутюр @hotcouture · 22,535 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
ШопагоLee @ShopahoLee · 43,019 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Style” (@style), 154,895 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/style.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.