9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,236–23,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:13
23,240
-5
12 Aug 2026, 13:34
23,245
-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:31
23,248
-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:41
23,249
-10
9 Aug 2026, 15:21
23,259
-2
8 Aug 2026, 18:54
23,261
+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:26
23,259
-4
6 Aug 2026, 19:54
23,263
-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:05
23,270
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
56.4%
avg views ÷ 23,240 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,100
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
21 (24 April 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
65,520
Reactions total
2,316
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
14,619 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,400
64.3%
👍
1,676
11.5%
💔
1,647
11.3%
😁
621
4.25%
🥰
464
3.17%
❤🔥
247
1.69%
💯
225
1.54%
🕊
154
1.05%
👎
137
0.937%
🎉
48
0.328%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,619reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Masculinity vs Toxic Masculinity
مانیشا دختر من دو هفته دیگه میره اول دبیرستان. نشونده بودمش و میگفتم ببین آدمهایی هستند مثل Nick Fuentes یا Andrew Tate که محتوایی تولید میکنند که ممکنه پسرهای دورت نسبت بهشون آسیب پذیر باشند چون الگوی خوب و مدرنی از مردانگی دورشون نداشتهاند.
بعد گفتم ببین من یه تعریف جمع و جور از فرق مردانگی و مردانگی سمی در یک تحلیل رادیویی شنیدم شاید به دردت بخوره:
مردانگی: وقتی مردی با خدمت کر…
دوستان من یک نکتهای رو این چند هفته در گفتگوهایی با دوستان تکرار شد اینجا خدمتتون بگم محض هدیه. شاید در این شرایط بحرانی کمکی کرد.
با توجه به شرایط بسیار مشکلی که ایرانیها در همه جای دنیا و مخصوصا داخل ایران دارند مدیریت میکنند یک الگوی فکری که من فکر میکنم در این شرایط تابآوری شما رو بیشتر میکنه و کمک میکنه استقامت روحی بیشتری داشته باشید و در تصمیمگیری آزادی عمل و شفافیت فکری بیشتری داشته باشید اینه که حواستون…
توی انگلیسی دوتا اصطلاح داریم nice و kind
فکر میکنم بهترین ترجمه برای نایس بشه دلپذیر بودن ولی کایند بشه مهربان بودن
تفکیک این دوتا خیلی مهمه.
دلپذیر بودن وابسته به تایید دیگری هست. ما باید یه جوری رفتار کنیم که برای دل بقیه خوش بیاد. مهربان بودن ارزش محور هست. ما مهربان هستیم چون فکر میکنیم ارزش گذاشتن به دیگران کار درستی هست
دلپذیر بودن خود-محور هست. ما سعی میکنیم دلپذیر باشیم که دیگران ما رو دوست داشته باشند. …
عزیزان، این رو اینجا بگم که همه ببینند. یک عده قلیلی در این جمع هر از گاهی جو رو متشنج میکنید، دوباره هم شروع کردید. ادامه پیدا کنه برای آرامش اعصاب بقیه کامنتها رو دوباره خواهم بست.
گفتم پست بنویسم که دیده بشه.
در کار، اعتماد به نفس حس کردنی نیست، کسب کردنی هست.
اعتماد به نفس زمانی ایجاد میشه که کار بسیار سختی رو انجام بدیم، پوستمون کنده میشه اما انجام میشه و اون احساس توانستن در ما جوانه میزنه.
اشتباه رایج اینه که برای انجام کارهای سخت منتظر میمونند که احساس اعتماد به نفس بکنن. احساس اعتماد به نفس اون طرف میدان منتظر شما ایستاده.
Your physical limitations or features are not a character flaw
دوستان یک موردی هست که ارزش داره راجع بهش گفتگو کنیم.
محدودیتهای جسمی - خصوصیات فیزیک بدن شما
کیس اول: دوست عزیزی بحرانهای مختلفی توی این مرحله از زندگی دارند. بعد از نشانههایی که دارند کرختی و خمودگی هست. سوال اولی که من خدمتشون دارم اینه که آزمایش خون دادی؟ خوابت منظمه؟ کمبود آهن نداری؟ منظورم چیه؟ ذهن و بدن مرتبط هستند. بعضی وقتها افکاری که داریم…
خداحافظ آقای سارگون
من با آقای سارگون همین دو سه ماه پیش آشنا شدم. وقتی آمدیم این محله جدید دنبال خیاط میگشتم که لباس سفید مانیشا رو برای جشن آخر سال مدرسه کوتاه کنه. توی گوگل پیداش کردم.
آقای سارگون اصالتا آشوری هست. از آشوریهای عراق. بچه که بوده با پدر و مادرش در یونان بزرگ شده و زمانی که جیمی کارتر رییسجمهور بوده آمده آمریکا. همون دیدار اول توضیح داد که چند سالیه مغازهاش رو بسته و از خونه کار میکنه چون مغازه…
به مانیشا میگم اسم این عروسک ابر رو میتونی بگذاری ابرک. َک که میذاری معنیش میشه کوچک. ابر کوچک.
یخورده فکر کرد بعد گفت پس اسم این یکی عروسک رو هم بذاریم سگک؟
من: 😳
فردوسی: 😳
در طول هفته پیامی از دوستان ساکن داخل ایران داشتم که کسب و کارهای داخلی نیاز به کمک دارند و دوستمون پیشنهاد کرده بودند که دوباره پست تبلیغ بگذاریم. این پست برای کمک به عزیزان داخل ایرانه.
دوستان عزیز ساکن ایران، این پست برای شما عزیزان هست که بیایید برای خودتون تبلیغ کنید.
دوستان خارج از ایران لطفا فقط اگر خدمات یا محصول خاصی لازم دارین بگین شاید کسی اینجا بتونه به دستتون برسونه. اگر هم میتونید هدیهای مثل مثلا مش…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @pv44telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 118,248 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پانتهآ وزیری” (@pv44telegram), 23,240 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pv44telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
