Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Omeed

Channel

Omeed

@sayewavy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,166subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001843036689
TypeChannel
Username@sayewavy
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sayewavy

Growth

1,1641,1671,165.520 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,164 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,166 subscribers1,16620 August 202626 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,164–1,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 09:431,166+2
23 Aug 2026, 15:031,164-3
20 Aug 2026, 03:451,167no change
20 Aug 2026, 03:301,167first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.7%
avg views ÷ 1,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
498
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total9,960
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC334 viewsread 20 August 2026

حس میکنم خوشبخت‌ترین آدم دنیام که میتونم بعد از یه روز سخت تو بغلت مچاله بشم

Signed Omeed

18 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC369 viewsread 20 August 2026

«خب تا کلاد اینجای کارو انجام میده منم برم کارامو انجام بدم» (ظرف شستن)

Signed Omeed

18 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC403 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Omeed

17 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC431 viewsread 20 August 2026

For the last year i’ve had only one goal, to become a Youtube Creative Director; I’ve had this goal before i even know what the fuck that even is. I’ve got to experience it in the last 3 months, I’ve made a bunch of money doing it, i made a few connections, I’ve pitched people ideas they now running their youtube channel just based of those ideas. Today on the call i gave my 2 weeks notice to leave the role and the

Signed Omeed

17 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC522 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«نه داداش بیین، ایران درست میشه، اینا کم‌کم کنار میان با چیزی که مردم میخوان» ایران سال بعد:

Signed Omeed

17 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC452 viewsread 20 August 2026

فکر میکنم از نهایت ۳ ساعت بیشتر وفتمو رو کار کرتیو گذاشتن دیگه خروجی نداره فقط دکمه کلیک میکنم و میخوام کار تموم شه

Signed Omeed

17 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC465 viewsread 20 August 2026

ولی حال بهم زنه انقدر متن AIی دم دستی میبینم

Signed Omeed

17 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC462 viewsread 20 August 2026

نمیخواستم بذارم لینکدین گذاشتم اینجا

Signed Omeed

17 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC492 viewsread 20 August 2026

It just feels like all the Words I read nowadays i just LLM Generated, Posts, Captions, Descriptions, Personal Chats. So i'm just starting to love the Chats that have a few errors in them, there grammar is off or there are few typos Before if it was perfect that meant the person had put time to clean it up. But now it is the opposite, it feels like the person actually put in the time to type it out.

Signed Omeed

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sayewavy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 739,100 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Omeed” (@sayewavy), 1,166 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sayewavy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.