Channel
@lifeofother
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,568subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001986142820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lifeofother |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lifeofother |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 2,568 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,563 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 2,558 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,550 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 2,550 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,398 |
| Reactions total | 210 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
210 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 210 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه تجربهی شخصی: شما اگر در زندگی و انجام کارهاتون و خود مراقبتی و نظافتتون، انسان منظمی باشی، هیچکس هیچی نمیتونه به شما بگه. هرچی هجمهی بیشتری وارد شه، از آشوب زندگی شخصی خودته.
❤16
Signed Nikally
همه یه دید صفر و صدی ای توی روابط پیدا کردن که ترسناکه (احتمالا نشات گرفته از سوشال مدیا). مثلا اگه فلان کار رو نکرد کنسله، فلان چیز رو نگفت پس داره خیانت میکنه، اگه اینجوریه پس اونجوریه. دیگه آدما وقت نمی ذارن برای شناخت همدیگه.
❤17
Signed Nikally
گفت: این دوره زمونه خیلی سخت شده. گفتم: آره حاجی (فکر کردم داره از بازار میگه) گفت: درست بودن خیلی سخت شده.
❤11
Signed Nikally
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed Nikally
one day, there will be nothing left, but stories.
❤2
Signed Nikally
وقتی دو یا چند نفر درگیر یه چالش یا اختلاف هستن و تو نقش پل ارتباطی، شنونده یا میانجی رو داری، اگه روایت هر کدوم رو جداگانه بشنوی میبینی خیلی وقتا بیشتر آدما داستان رو از جایی تعریف میکنن که اگه فقط همون روایتو بشنوی، به نظر میرسه حق با اوناست. برای همین، خیلی وقتا مسئلهی اصلی این نیست که کی راست میگه یا حق با کیه. چیزی که اکثرا برای خودم جالبه نوع روایت آدمها و اصولی که بهش پایبندن و زاویهی دیدشون نسبت به ماج…
❤5
Signed Nikally
بچهها اگر گیمر هستید امیدوارم فقط گیمر نباشید و به باقی مسئولیتهاتون رسیدگی کنید یا دستکم از گیمتون مطاع قابلی برای گذران زندگی به دست بیارید. وگرنه هم خودتون به فنا خواهید رفت هم اطرافیان از یه جایی به بعد مسئول به دوش کشیدن شما و مسئولیتهاتون نیستن و یهو میبینید نه حرفتون اعتبار داره نه قولتون نه کسی میتونه درست و حسابی روتون حساب کنه و... چون هربار گیمو بهونه کردید. حقیقتا امیدوارم یه روز یه پسر گیمر خوب و م…
❤7
Signed Nikally
یه بار نیکا گفت:زیستن جرئت میخواد چون همواره ریسک بگایی زیاده و من هربار اینو با خودم تکرار میکنم که شجاعت و جرئت زندگی کردن داشته باش :)
❤5
Signed Nikally
بهم گفت:« کیفیتِ رابطه رو مدت زمانی که در روز با هم میگذرونین تعیین نمیکنه؛ بلکه لحظاتی تعیین میکنه که به هم نیاز دارین و کنار همدیگهاین.»
❤6
Signed Nikally
این روزا، اگه از پستی توی اینستاگرام خوشم بیاد، کامنت میذارم. زیر ویدیوهای یوتوب، کامنت میذارم. تویِ چنلهای دیلیِ دوستام، کامنت میذارم. اگه از یه دورهای استفاده کردم و خوب بوده، کامنت میذارم. برای آنلاینشاپهایی که ازشون خرید کردم، کامنت میذارم. زیر معرفی کتابهایی که خوندم، کامنت میذارم. همهجا و همهجا که به نوعی بهم مربوطه، کامنتِ خودم رو میذارم. چون اول از همه خودم به خودم ثابت کنم که نظرم چقدر میتونه …
❤9
Signed Nikally
دقیقا یه پکیجه. اینجوری که نمیتونی رها بودنشو دوست داشته باشی ولی کنترلناپذیر بودنشو نه. همواره به این مسئله دقت کردم. اینکه اگه آروم و منطقی بودنشو دوست دارم، صبر زیادش منو اذیت میکنه. اگه عجول هیجانی بودنمو یه جاهایی دوست نداره، از مدیریت و نگاه همهجانبهم به مسائل سود میبره. میدونی، جدی باید منعطف باشی و مثل یه پکیج جدانشدنی نگاش کنی. همهرو باهم باید ببری، درهمه.
❤23
Signed Nikally
در حقیقت کلا اینجا ( در دایره خانوادگی) با کمبود مردهای با جنم در اطرافم رو به رو هستم. آدم کاری و اهل کوششی که فرصتها رو دریابه و سستی نکنه و درایت به خرج بده و فورا اقدام کنه و اهل بیشتر خواستن باشه لاموجود. اونی که یه بستری براش فراهم نیست گلهای ازش نیست، ولی اونی که زمین خودشو هم آباد نمیکنه و دل به زندگی نمیده و اهل به تعویق انداختن و امروز فردا کردنه برای بنده قابل اتکا و ایضا قابل تحمل نیست. بنده هربار دار…
❤27
Signed Nikally
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lifeofother. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 396,997 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دیگران” (@lifeofother), 2,568 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifeofother.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.