Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خرمالوی سیاه

Channel

خرمالوی سیاه

@theblackpersimmon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,614subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001061191280
TypeChannel
Username@theblackpersimmon
Created2 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/theblackpersimmon

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6083,6163,61231 August 2026 — 3,608 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,610 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,614 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,611 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,616 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,614 subscribers3,61431 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 17 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,607–3,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:153,614-2
12 Sept 2026, 22:393,616+5
8 Sept 2026, 22:593,611-3
3 Sept 2026, 11:003,614+4
31 Aug 2026, 14:153,610+2
31 Aug 2026, 11:303,608first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.3%
avg views ÷ 3,614 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 August 202631 August 2026)
Views total29,104
Reactions total939
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

939 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42545.3%
👍18820.0%
💔13514.4%
😁11312.0%
😭363.83%
🥰192.02%
👌151.60%
🕊50.532%
👎30.319%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 939 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC756 views38 reactionsread 31 August 2026

الان که داشت خونه می‌لرزید، داشتم پست طنز می‌دیدم. اینطوری بودم پاشم؟ پا نشم؟ پا نشدم. :)

😁28👍10

30 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC957 views78 reactionsread 31 August 2026

یه سنی هست که هی با دوستات دعا دعا می‌کنید والدین براتون بستنی بخرن و ببرن شما رو شهربازی. بعد یه سنی می‌رسه که با دوستانتون درمورد پریود و وای والدین من سکس نداشتن و از این کارای بد نمی‌کنند حرف می‌زنید. بعد خدا خدا می‌کنید مادر پدرتون دفتر خاطراتتون رو نخونن و کشو و کمدتون رو نگردن. بعد صحبتتون با دوستانتون اینه که چرا والدین فکر می‌کنن سکس فرزندشون در شب رخ می‌ده؟ بعد صحبتتون اینه که در ۲۴ سالگی‌تون تمام جزییاتتون

😁4120😭17

30 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC981 views52 reactionsread 31 August 2026

این حجم فحش که کودک امروزی بلده و این حجم شوخی‌های جنسی که بین دختران جوان باب شده که نشانه‌‌‌ای برای کول بودن و متفاوت بودنه اذیتم می‌کنه. و احتمالا اون رگ سنتی_ کلاسیک دهه شصتی منه. در ادامه‌ی پست بالا معتقدم زن و دختری که اتفاقا در جای خودش شیطنت کلامی بکنه بینهایت هم جذابه، اما خب.... احتمالا برم نظریه‌م رو مطرح کنم در جامعه، به زن‌ستیزی_ سرکوب_ دخالت در امور دیگران و راست‌گرایی متهم می‌شم. (و البته اهمیت نداره

👍37💔11😁4

30 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 31 August 2026

مبحث امروز: مرد باهوش زن باهوش از منظر جذابیت

👍93

30 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,050 views36 reactionsread 31 August 2026

یکی از برنامه‌های جذابی که گاهی در اینستاگرام دنبال می‌کنم، اون برنامه‌ی قدیمی رقصه، اونی که یه زوج رندوم انتخاب می‌شن و ناگهان با یه آهنگ رندوم باید برقصن. قطعا در زندگی بعدی یا آوازخون می‌شم یا رقاصی چیزی. و روی سن اجرا می‌کنم.

30👍3😁3

29 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,120 views19 reactionsread 31 August 2026

مبحث امشب: آدمایی که دیگران رو معذب می‌کنن.

💔15😭31

29 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,200 views37 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

این مدت زیاد اومدم کوچه‌ی لولاگر و هربار سر چرخوندم تو مغازه یا نگاه کردم به آدما که دارن کالباس قبل پیتزا می‌‌خورن. الان که نشستم روبروش تا موزه‌ی اسباب‌بازی باز شه، یادم افتاد ۱۸_۱۹ سالگی، اولین‌بار که اومدم اینجا فکر می‌کردم چه کشف بزرگی. بدو بدو یه گزارش نوشتم دادم مجله‌ی دختران چاپ کرد. پیوست: دختران یه مجله پرطرفدار بود که دیگه چاپ نشد.

21🥰16

29 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC≈5,250 views43 reactionsread 31 August 2026

از دوستان "این‌بار" تقاضا دارم کارگاه پخت پای سیب و کیک کدوحلوایی در پاییز برگزار کنن که من شرکت کنم. با تشکر🌺

36👍7

29 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC≈1,240 views84 reactionsread 31 August 2026

طی یک‌سال اخیر بارها و بارها در زندگی من یک مساله تکرار شده. زمانی که دو سوی یک رابطه من و یک همجنس بوده‌ایم، درباره سوتفاهم، نیاز، سوال و خواسته خود حرف زده‌ایم. اگر چیزی برایمان جای شک و شبهه داشته گفته‌ایم و انگار بلد بوده‌ایم "گفت‌وگو" راه حل درست است. اما دیروز برای هفتمین بار در یک سال اخیر متوجه شدم فردی که روبرویم است در رابطه و همجنسم هم نیست، انقدر برای خودش بافته و بافته تا به نتیجه‌ی وحشتناکی که زاده‌ی تخ

40👍38👌3👎3

28 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026

مبحث امشب: داستان یا رمان کلاسیکی که دوستش دارید....

11

28 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,180 views61 reactionsread 31 August 2026

یکی از جذاب‌ترین آثار آلبا دسس پدس برای من کتاب " عروس فرنگی" است. روایت مردی است که جهت سواستفاده وارد زندگی دختری بینهایت سکسی و درظاهر احمق می‌شود و کلی نقشه می‌چیند و در قامت نامزد رابطه‌اش را با دختر زیاد می‌کند تا بالاخره بتواند به خواسته‌ی شهوانی خود برسد. ما تمام مدت درگیر روایتی هستیم که گویای سادگی و حماقت دخترک ساده‌دل است که به سادگی همه چیز خود را بیان می‌کند و حتی حالا به مرد داستان لو داده است که عموی

👍50👌101

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @theblackpersimmon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پانته‌آ وزیری
@pv44telegram · 23,040
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خرمالوی سیاه” (@theblackpersimmon), 3,614 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theblackpersimmon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.