Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dern.

@Dernius

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,215subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386734148
TypeChannel
Username@Dernius
Created5 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dernius

Growth

3,2013,2193,2106 August 2026 — 3,201 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,202 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,219 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,215 subscribers3,2156 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,198–3,222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:243,215-4
9 Aug 2026, 23:363,219+17
7 Aug 2026, 08:373,202+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:523,201no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:593,201first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 3,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
695
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (30 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total11,126
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC442 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @carlmaoPhoto

finally a great picture of my bone collection (I still have s lot of them that I haven’t finished cleaning yet but here you go)

5 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC550 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitchniallismine

دیوانه‌وار عاشق یاد گرفتن چیزای جدیدم، عاشق خود فرایند یاد گرفتن. اینکه به یه سوالی که مدتها تو ناخودآگاهم جا خوش کرده پاسخ داده شه، فکر کردن به سوالای بیشتر، ارتباط دادن دونسته‌های جدیدم به قبلیا و ساختن یه مفهوم جدید. کاش میشد تا ابد زنده بود تا بتونی تا ابد یاد بگیری.

5 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC593 viewsread 7 August 2026

اینجا نشسته‌ای و تنها چیزی که می‌خواهی، انتظار کشیدن است؛ فقط انتظار، تا دیگر چیزی برای انتظار باقی نماند.

5 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC589 viewsread 7 August 2026

پانصد یا هزار تکه اطلاعات از برابر چشم‌های هوشیارت گذشته‌اند، اما حافظه‌ات از نگه داشتن حتی یکی از آن‌ها سر باز زده است.

5 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC579 viewsread 7 August 2026

بی‌تفاوتی‌ات ساکن و بی‌تلاطم است؛ آرامشی راکد. مردی خاکستری هستی که برایش خاکستری هیچ معنایی از ملال یا افسردگی ندارد.

5 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC565 viewsread 7 August 2026

زندگی‌ای است بی‌هیچ غافلگیری. می‌خوابی، راه می‌روی، و همچنان به زندگی ادامه می‌دهی. مانند موش آزمایشگاهی‌ای که دانشمندی حواس‌پرت، در هزارتوی آزمایش رهایش کرده و دیگر هرگز برنگشته است.

5 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC559 viewsread 7 August 2026

تنها چیزی که اهمیت دارد، تنهایی توست. هر کاری که بکنی، هر جا که بروی، هیچ‌یک از آنچه می‌بینی اهمیتی ندارد. هر کاری که انجام می‌دهی، بیهوده است. هیچ‌کدام از آنچه در جست‌وجویش هستی، واقعی نیست. تنهایی، تنها چیزی است که وجود دارد؛ هر بار که با آن روبه‌رو می‌شوی، هر بار که ناچار می‌شوی با خودت روبه‌رو شوی.

5 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC537 viewsread 7 August 2026

بدبختی یکباره بر سرت آوار نشد؛ آرام، نرم و تقریبا با تملق، راهش را به درون زندگی‌ات باز کرد. با وسواسی تمام در تار و پود زندگی‌ات نفوذ کرد؛ در حرکت‌هایت، در ساعت‌هایی که بیداری و خوابت را شکل می‌دهند، در اتاقت. شکاف‌های سقف را تصاحب کرد، خطوط چهره‌ات را در آینهٔ ترک‌خورده، دستهٔ ورق بازی را. یواشکی در چکه‌های شیر آبِ پاگرد خزید و با هر ضربهٔ ناقوسِ کلیسای سن‌روک که گذر هر ربع ساعت را اعلام می‌کند، در وجودت طنین انداخ

5 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC557 viewsread 7 August 2026

به اتاقت برمی‌گردی، لباس‌هایت را درمی‌آوری، زیر ملحفه‌ها می‌لغزی، چراغ را خاموش می‌کنی و چشم‌هایت را می‌بندی. حالا همان ساعتی است که کتاب‌هایی را که هزار بار خوانده‌ای، باز هم با ملالی بی‌پایان ورق می‌زنی؛ همان ساعتی که ساعت‌ها از این پهلو به آن پهلو می‌شوی، بی‌آن‌که خوابت ببرد. این همان ساعتی است که با چشمانی باز در تاریکی دراز کشیده‌ای؛ دستت در امتداد تخت باریک، کورمال‌کورمال به دنبال زیرسیگاری، کبریت، آخرین نخ سیگ

5 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC542 viewsread 7 August 2026

در روزی مثل همین امروز، کمی دیرتر یا کمی زودتر، بی‌آن‌که غافلگیر شوی، ناگهان درمی‌یابی که چیزی درست نیست؛ که زندگی کردن را بلد نیستی و هرگز هم نخواهی آموخت. چیزی درونت شکسته است. دیگر آن چیزی را حس نمی‌کنی که تا پیش از این به تو استحکام می‌بخشید. حسِ بودن، احساسِ تعلق داشتن به جهان یا زیستن در آن، آرام‌آرام از میان انگشتانت سر می‌خورد و محو می‌شود.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Dernius. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 379,162 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dern.” (@Dernius), 3,215 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dernius.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.