Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

شیشه‌ی عمر

@SaaraVerse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,847subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001423205836
TypeChannel
Username@SaaraVerse
Created8 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SaaraVerse

Growth

1,8271,8471,8376 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,832 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,847 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,824–1,850 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:591,847+15
10 Aug 2026, 16:221,832+5
7 Aug 2026, 10:301,827-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:451,828no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:351,828first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 1,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
357
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,917
Reactions total385
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15941.3%
🤣10928.3%
👍379.61%
💔379.61%
😭266.75%
🔥102.60%
🌚61.56%
🐳10.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC130 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

این تابستون سه تا کاراموز گرفته بودیم. دو تا خجالتیِ معذب، یه اجتماعیِ بسیار نوروتیپیکال. درسی که بنده از کار کردن با این سه تا گرفتم اینه که زندگی واسه آدمای اجتماعیِ نوروتیپیکال واقعا رو ایزی موده عزیزان. دنده ماشین اتوماته، سنسور نقطه‌کور روشنه، کروز مود فعاله. واسه بقیه ما انگار که پراید آموزشگاه رانندگی با اون کلاچ خرابش دستمونه و تو تمام مسیر هم دستی ماشین بالاست!

😭13

7 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC292 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

همه اکشن دارن؟ اگه ناروتو رو پیدا کنین و بزنین روش کاگه‌بونشین اجرا می‌کنه. کسی چیزی شبیه این پیدا کرده؟!

7 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC291 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قسمتای مورد علاقه من 😁 استیون هاوکینز در کنار لاک‌پشت‌های نینجا اون پسره که گیف رقصیدنش با کاپشن آبی و عینک دودی هست 😁 نئو در حال جنگ با جکی چان دختر لوفی سر یه میز با دیو و دلبر (ولدمورتم اون گوشه داره هورکراکس درست می‌کنه سر شبی 😂)

🤣5

6 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC297 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @waiting_for_tea

خب امروز یه نفر بهم گفت چه سایت‌های باحالی بلدی، منم جوگیر شدم و تصمیم گرفتم سایت‌های باحال دیگه‌ای رو پیدا کنم. https://floor796.com/ این سایت طبقه ۷۹۶، یه صفحه بزرگ از همه شخصیت‌های داستانی فرهنگ عامه‌اس که وجود داشته. می‌تونین به هر سمتی که بخواین اسکرول کنین و شخصیت‌های مورد علاقه‌تون رو تو اتاق خودشون مشغول یه کاری پیدا کنین. اگه کاراکتری به نظرتون جالب اومد و نمیشناختینش، کافیه روش کلیک کنین که بهتون بگه کیه و

1

6 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC362 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

می‌دونم که الان برخیتون میاید می‌گید نه من حواسم هست، من مراقبم، امکان نداره این اتفاقا برای من بیفته... تو مراقبی و حواست هست، ولی اگه اون‌قدر شرایط زندگیت سخته که جی‌پی‌تی از پشت مانیتور فهمیده ممکنه نیاز به کمک داشته باشی.. متاسفم، ولی واقعا ممکنه این اتفاقا برای تو هم بیفته.

👍138

6 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC351 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خلاصه که بله شما اگه ترمز دوچرخه‌ت رو ببُری، چیزی نیست که تو سرپایینی جلوی سرعتتو بگیره، ولی چیزی هم نیست که ته جاده جلوی تو دره رفتنتو بگیره. 😁

🔥10

6 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC354 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

آیزاک آسیموف، نویسنده علمی تخیلی معروف، سه تا قانون اصلی روباتیک رو تو یکی از رمان‌هاش این‌جوری معرفی می‌کنه: روبات‌ها نمیتونن به آدم‌ها آسیب بزنن؛ چه مستقیم، چه با کمک به یه آدم دیگه، چه با بی‌تفاوتی. روبات‌ها باید از دستور آدم‌ها اطاعت کنن، مگر اینکه این اطاعت قانون اول رو نقض کنه. روبات‌ها باید سعی کنن از خودشون محافظت کنن، مگر این که این تلاش مورد اول و دوم رو نقض کنه. این قوانین تو دهه ۴۰-۵۰ میلادی نوشته شده‌ن

22

6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC364 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

این هم یه «هک» رایج دیگه در رابطه با هوش مصنوعیه. 😁

🤣30

6 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC351 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من واقعا باید دایرکت کانال رو ببندم این‌قدر دیر به دیر چکش می‌کنم. 😂

🤣11

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @SaaraVerse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 438,707 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شیشه‌ی عمر” (@SaaraVerse), 1,847 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaaraVerse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.