Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Daily Digest

Channel

Daily Digest

@thedailydigestt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,734subscribers

+340 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001249414676
TypeChannel
Username@thedailydigestt
Created18 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thedailydigestt

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,3944,7344,5646 August 2026 — 4,394 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,400 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,428 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,446 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,475 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,481 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,508 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,511 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,508 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,502 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,660 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,698 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,734 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +340. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,343–4,785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 03:194,734+36
11 Sept 2026, 09:564,698+38
6 Sept 2026, 09:384,660+158
1 Sept 2026, 17:164,502-6
29 Aug 2026, 20:444,508-3
26 Aug 2026, 16:034,511+3
23 Aug 2026, 17:144,508+27
20 Aug 2026, 06:244,481+6
16 Aug 2026, 19:584,475+29
13 Aug 2026, 05:334,446+18
10 Aug 2026, 05:114,428+28
6 Aug 2026, 20:414,400+6
6 Aug 2026, 19:174,394first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

729 reactions across 28 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59281.2%
😢9913.6%
🦄385.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 729 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC866 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026

و من یاد گرفتم، میشه اشتباه کرد، امتحان رو خراب کرد، ماشین رو خراب کرد، فرش رو کثیف کرد، ظرف رو شکوند و… ولی خشم و سرزنش دریافت نکنی.

54

8 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,040 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026

گاهی یک رابطه سالم، می‌تونه چیزی بیشتر از «عشق» به ما بده؛ می‌تونه بخشی از زخم‌های کودکی‌مون رو ترمیم کنه. نه اینکه همسرمون روان‌درمانگر ما باشه؛ بلکه یه رابطه امن می‌تونه «تجربه عاطفی اصلاح‌کننده» ایجاد کنه. مثلاً کودکی که یاد گرفته: «اگر اشتباه کنم، آدمی که دوستش دارم عصبانی می‌شه، سرزنشم می‌کنه یا طردم می‌کنه.» ممکنه در بزرگسالی هم با خودش فکر کنه: «نباید اشتباه کنم؛ وگرنه رابطه‌ام رو از دست می‌دم.» اما در یک را

55

8 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC744 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

سر غذا داشتیم با همسرم راجع به یه موضوعی در مورد دیگری صحبت میکردیم؛ بهش گفتم خوشحالم که تو آدم عصبی‌ای نیستی، واقعا اگه آدم عصبی و پرخاشگری بودی، من هیچ وقت نمیتونستم تو رابطه دووم بیارم؛ اصلا یه جورایی انگار عصبی بودن هر آدمی واسم رد فلگه و کاملاً نگرانم میکنه، بهم میریزم. بعد مکالممون با خودم فکر کردم و حس کردم یه چیزی رو کشف کردم؛

42

7 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC976 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

من انقدر روی حالت «بخشش» بودم که یه بار در جواب یه رفتار بد، گفتم: «خواهش می‌کنم، اشکالی نداره.» بعد یادم افتاد طرف اصلاً نگفته بود «ببخشید»!!! تا صبح :)))))))

😢338🦄3

7 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 8 August 2026

انقدر مازندرانی کم داریم اینجا؟🥲 آمل، بابل، سوادکوه اینجارو هم بگید باز اوکیه. جنگلللل میخوام، یه جای جنگلی بکر🫠

7 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,000 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @azanemaa

شفافیت یعنی لازم نیست بدونی می‌خوای با تمام زندگی‌ات چه کار کنی؛ کافیه بدونی «این هفته» می‌خوای چه کار کنی. لازم نیست از همین حالا همه‌چیز رو حل کرده باشی. فقط کافیه «قدم بعدی‌ات» رو بدونی. 🌱

4

7 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,330 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ببینید دوستان قبل از هر چیز، یادمون باشه که ما دیگه بزرگسالیم. رابطه‌ی سالم فقط به احترام و محبت نیست؛ “مسئولیت پذیری هم هست ”. اگر به کسی قولی می‌دید یا برای موضوع مهمی برنامه می‌ذارید، نمی‌تونید دقیقه نود، بدون دلیل موجه، همه‌چیز رو کنسل کنید. اگر هم قرار بوده خبر بدید که میاید یا نمیاید، درست نیست طرف مقابل رو روزها در بلاتکلیفی نگه دارید و لحظه آخر تصمیم‌تون رو اعلام کنید!!!!! این‌ها توقعات عجیب یا سختی نیستند؛

61

6 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC≈1,060 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @In_Search_of_San_Francisco

چقدر توی جمله‌ی "منم دلم می‌خواست"، حس کهنه‌ی نرسیدن هست.

😢122

6 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISenvolerIPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @thedailydigestt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هنرِ بودن | Art of being
@jaduyesahar · 25,593
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
Dr Behzad Chavooshi
@drbehzadchavooshi · 54,820
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
❤️. عاشقان کتاب. ❤️
@bokk_lovers · 34,645
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
پانته‌آ وزیری
@pv44telegram · 23,040
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daily Digest” (@thedailydigestt), 4,734 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedailydigestt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.