Channel
@emicalll
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,126subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001896681122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emicalll |
| Description | 🌵 این یه کتاب زنده از اتوبایوگرافی منه و هیچ ربطی به کتاب آلبرکامو نداره. گاهی اگر خوب بودم بذار ایده شم، اگر بد بودم لقمان شو. لینکهای مرتبط با من: https://linktr.ee/Nikally اینستای من: nikally.me |
| Created | 13 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emicalll |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 15,126 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 15,121 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 15,126 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 15,127 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 15,123 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 15,145 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 15,141 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 186,278 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @emicalll. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
من زخمهایی روی تنم دارم که هروقت لباسم رو بالا بزنی پیداست. همین زخمها من رو من کرده. به من نگو باید فراموش شن. به من نگو نباید باشن. به من نگو جای زخم روی بدن نیست. اینها یادگار گذشتهان، تا ابد همراه منن.
Photo, posted without a caption
یکی از عزیزان در ادامه این متن نوشته مادر شدن یعنی بینقص بودن که من شدیدا با این تعریف مخالفم. من در کل با تعریف بینقصی برای انسان رو باهاش زاویهی شدیدی دارم. آدمی هرگز نمیتونه بینقص باشه. مخصوصا مادری که دائما با یک فرزند زبون نفهم سر کار داره. اون چیزی که آدمی باید یاد بگیره باشه، آدمیه که درک کنه جایزالخطاست و میتونه خطا کنه و بلد باشه اگر خطا کرد خطا رو ببینه، بپذیره، شرمنده باشه و جبران کنه. اینکه چطور می…
من هنوز معتقدم آدمی برای بچهدار شدن باید خودش رو تربیت کنه. ما به اشتباه فکر میکنیم باید بچه رو تربیت کنیم درصورتی که داشتن بچه، نیازمند اینه که ما خودمون رو برای صبورتر بودن، آرومتر بودن، واکنشهای تنشدار ندادن، در نقش قربانی نرفتن، صریح درخواستهارو بیان کردن و هزار و یک مورد دیگهای که لازمه تا بشه مسالمتآمیز باید با کودک زیست رو باید در طول سالها برای خود بوجود آورد اگر قصد فرزندآوری وجود داره. این حتی پس ا…
یه رفتاری رو از آدمیزاد خیلی دیدم که شاید در قالب یه داستان خیلی راحتتر بشه تعریفش کرد و بنظرم اگر آدمی این برای جا بیفته روابطش خیلی روونتر پیش میره. یه مادری رو میشناختم همواره و در هرحال و هرجمع از بچهها و شوهرش شاکی بود که من اینهمه صبح تا شب خدمت میکنم، تمیز میکنم، جمع میکنم ال میکنم و بل میکنم ولی اینها هیچکاری نمیکنن. جواب اولیهای هم که از بچههای کوچیکش میشنید این بود که خب میخواستی نکنی و بعد …
مثال برای گزینهی دو چی میتونه باشه؟
قبلتر ها نوشتم مشکل یک عده با کل مسئلهی قدرت و انحصار قدرت نیست، مشکلشون اینه که دست اونا نیست. یک عدهی دیگه رو هم میبینم این روزها که به نامهای مختلف و شکلهای مختلف، برای حفظ یک چیزی که بنظرشون مهمه، خیلی مشکلی با پیرزن جیغ زن داخل مترو که بهت حمله میکنه تا حجابت رو سرت کنی ندارن فقط میخوان توی جامعه اون خودشون باشن تا ارزشهاشون دفاع کنن من اما راه بهتری توی سر دارم برای کسانی که دغدغمندن چیزی رو در جامعه ح…
Genova ♥︎
- شب پر ستاره.
هیچچیز زیر نور خورشید جدید نیست.
“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.” —Murray N. Rothbard
این مهمه که مثل آمران به معروف و نهی از منکر، با سرسختی و محافظه کاری تلاش نکنیم چیزهایی رو که دغدغمون هستن رو در افراد زورچپون کنیم چرا که برخلاف اراده ی آزاد فردی و حق مالکیت فردی حرکت میکنه. باید بپذیریم عقاید متنوع و رفتارهای متنوعی وجود دارن که توسط افراد انتخاب میشن و تنها در صورتی که ناقض حق مالکیت فرد دیگهای باشن باید مورد پرسش قرار بگیرن. در کل بخوام بگم چه نیک و چه بد، هیچ یک نباید در زندگی افراد زور چپون…
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @emicalll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 74,724 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بیگانه” (@emicalll), 15,126 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emicalll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.