Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 51 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,260–1,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 11:56
1,263
-1
15 Sept 2026, 23:58
1,264
-3
7 Sept 2026, 16:20
1,267
+3
2 Sept 2026, 22:25
1,264
-2
31 Aug 2026, 06:34
1,266
+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:03
1,265
-2
21 Aug 2026, 12:54
1,267
-3
18 Aug 2026, 02:11
1,270
+4
11 Aug 2026, 05:01
1,266
+4
8 Aug 2026, 08:21
1,262
+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:48
1,261
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:32
1,261
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
191 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
153
80.1%
👍
18
9.42%
👏
10
5.24%
😢
6
3.14%
👎
2
1.05%
🔥
1
0.524%
🥰
1
0.524%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما در زاین به دنبال یک ادیتور سریع و با انگیزه برای کمک به تولید محتوای بیشتر میگردیم. کافیست با تدوین و ابزارش آشنا باشید، کنجکاو و خلاق بمانید و با دنیای دیزاین، فرهنگ و هنر ناآشنا نباشید. لطفا هر چه سریعتر زیر همین پست تلگرامی برای ما آیدی تلگرام خود را بگذارید تا با شما تماس بگیریم.
درباره طراحی مشارکتی
نظامهای اجتماعی نمیتوانند بدون توجه به آنچه در گذشته بر آنان رفته است، و نیز بدون توجه به تصویر مشترکی که در حافظه فرهنگی آنان ذخیره شده، راه آیندهٔ خود را انتخاب کنند و، مادامی که اصول سازماندهندهٔ یک نظم اجتماعی بدون چالش و ثابت باقی بماند، نظامهای اجتماعی در تمام سطوح خود (خانواده، گروه، سازمان، و کل نظام) با سماجت به تکرار نظمی که در عمق حافظه مشترک فرهنگی جامعه ذخیره شده ادامه میدهند.
…
انسان نهتنها قادر است در ذهن خود تصاویری از آنچه هست بسازد، بلکه به کمک آنچه هست، میتواند تصاویری ذهنی از آنچه نیست و باید باشد بسازد و سپس آنها را به واقعیت تبدیل کند. در تفکر سیستمی، این توانایی همان قدرت طراحی، ساختآفرینی یا خلاقیت است که عامل اصلی تمدن بشری بهشمار میرود. زندگی اجتماعی، در یک معنا، نمایش قدرت تفکر طراحی انسان است.
از کتاب موانع فرهنگی شکوفایی نظام اجتماعی ایران از دیدگاه تفکر سیستمی
اپیزود نهم #پادکست_زاین منتشر شد.
این ویدئو پیش از اتفاقات دیماه ۱۴۰۴ و جنگ ایران و آمریکا ضبط شده است.
در این قسمت به بررسی پیوند میان دیزاین و #توسعه_پایدار با تمرکز بر چالشها و شرایط بومی ایران پرداختیم.
در یوتیوب تماشا کنید:
https://youtu.be/39r6DWKpB44?si=UOF01v0J6ux8uB6i
🟠 سهشنبه دیزاین | نشست صد و سی و هشتم
دیزاین و سیاست
سخنران: مازیار رضایی
سهشنبه ۱۲ خردادماه ۱۴۰۵
ساعت: ۱۶:۰۰ الی ۱۸:۰۰
آنلاین (لینک برگزاری متعاقبا اعلام میگردد)
منتظر دیدارتون هستیم :))
@tuesdesign 138
#tuesdesign #سهشنبهدیزاین
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zignchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نایاب نت | nayabnet @nayabnet_vip · 30,538 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 September 2026
آموزش زبان انگلیسی @Avaltc · 23,594 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 September 2026
Mindq @mindqinfo · 27,381 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
American_English_File Books @houshang_academy_american · 37,402 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
پانتهآ وزیری @pv44telegram · 23,040 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
مجله | خلاقیت، بدون مرز @AR_NOSRATI · 49,159 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
گفت و چای | فهیم عطار @fahimattar · 43,018 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
MOHSEN YEGANEH @MohsenTelegramChannel · 37,666 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زاین | Zign” (@zignchannel), 1,263 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zignchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.