Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for انجمن زیرشیروانی

Channel

انجمن زیرشیروانی

@peopleintheattic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,294subscribers

+488 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001828347780
TypeChannel
Username@peopleintheattic
Created14 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/peopleintheattic

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,80414,29414,0496 August 2026 — 13,806 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,804 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,817 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,850 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,929 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,948 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,971 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,976 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,009 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,034 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,038 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,058 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,066 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,072 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,074 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,067 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,059 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,063 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,065 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,069 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,070 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,098 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,103 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,118 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,128 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,166 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,183 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,215 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,262 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,294 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +488. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,731–14,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:0214,294+32
16 Sept 2026, 20:1914,262+47
15 Sept 2026, 01:2014,215+32
13 Sept 2026, 10:3814,183+17
11 Sept 2026, 17:1914,166+38
9 Sept 2026, 02:3814,128+10
5 Sept 2026, 22:2114,118+15
3 Sept 2026, 22:1814,103+5
2 Sept 2026, 10:1814,098+28
1 Sept 2026, 07:0514,070+1
31 Aug 2026, 03:3614,069+4
30 Aug 2026, 06:4714,065+2
28 Aug 2026, 06:3314,063+4
27 Aug 2026, 07:1914,059-8
26 Aug 2026, 06:5414,067-7
25 Aug 2026, 04:0714,074+2
23 Aug 2026, 23:3514,072+6
22 Aug 2026, 09:0714,066+8
20 Aug 2026, 20:5314,058+9
19 Aug 2026, 21:2414,049first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 14,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,680
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held44 (9 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total22,050
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 44 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @peopleintheattic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 06:23 UTC≈4,430 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

استادم گفت می‌دونم سرت شلوغه ولی اگر خوندیش نظرت رو بهم بگو. کمتر از یه ماه دیگه وقت دارم تا ۲۵۰ صفحه پایان‌نامه تحویل بدم ولی چشم استاد، بلکه ادبیات دوباره شور درونم رو بیدار کنه.

31 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈3,450 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

این آقای بیل هیدر هم واقعاً بازیگر اعجوبه‌ایه.

31 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

منی که موقع دیدن سریال نصفش رو تندتند می‌زنم جلو، دیشب فصل دوم و سوم Barry رو دیدم و سه‌چهار بار صحنه‌هاش رو زدم عقب و چند بار نگاهشون کردم. نمی‌دونم چرا واقعاً این سریال اون‌قدرها مطرح نشده ولی بازیگری، موضوع و داستانش واقعاً حرف نداره.

28 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈5,320 viewsread 2 September 2026

اندر احوال ما به‌قول حافظ «صعب‌روزی، بوالعجب‌کاری، پریشان‌عالمی».

21 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈7,910 viewsread 2 September 2026

از وقتی با ریحانه می‌رم بیرون و اون عکس می‌گیره دیگه حتی تلاشی نمی‌کنم برای عکس گرفتن. (عکس‌هاش عالیه.)

20 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈7,200 viewsread 2 September 2026

ویرایش جزو سخت‌ترین و در عین حال لذت‌بخش‌ترین بخش‌های زندگیم بوده. اینکه دوست‌هام هم اندازهٔ خودم ذوقش رو دارن واقعاً دلگرمم می‌کنه. 🌷

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @peopleintheattic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

·Alaska, Alaska·
@alaskaandtea · 23,447
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
le vent nous portera
@vernte · 27,981
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
🧙🏻‍♂️P H E N O M E N A👨🏻‍🔬
@phenomenalikeme · 23,625
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
_poune_
@Poonehmoghimi · 42,921
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
آن؛
@monadchannel · 52,355
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
سراب حقیقت☯️🕎✝️☪️
@sarabehaghighat · 22,342
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
پانته‌آ وزیری
@pv44telegram · 23,040
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
نباید می‌ماندیم - معین دهاز
@nabayad_m · 39,233
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
مطالعات تئاتر️ 🕊️
@Theaterstudies · 34,282
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
دکتر امیر میرهلی_کنکور
@Amirmirhelli · 25,064
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“انجمن زیرشیروانی” (@peopleintheattic), 14,294 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peopleintheattic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.