Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 아이티센글로벌(STO/RWA/스테이블코인)공부방

Channel

아이티센글로벌(STO/RWA/스테이블코인)공부방

@itcenstorwa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,851subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002070157756
TypeChannel
Username@itcenstorwa
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itcenstorwa

Growth

2,8502,8542,8527 August 2026 — 2,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,854 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,852 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,850 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,851 subscribers2,8517 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,849–2,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:472,851+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:242,850-2
11 Aug 2026, 08:122,852-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:182,854no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:072,854first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 2,851 subscribers
Avg views / post
788
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total14,970
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC433 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

어제 금으로 좋았던 종목 오늘은 변동성이 크네요

7 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC314 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aris1031

🔷 美 상원, 클래리티법 표결 9월로 연기 📌 핵심 내용 미국 상원이 암호화폐 시장 구조를 규정하는 CLARITY Act(클래리티법) 표결을 9월로 연기하기로 결정했습니다. 이번 연기는 상원 일정과 일부 조항에 대한 이견 등이 영향을 준 것으로 알려졌습니다. 법안이 폐기된 것은 아니며, 9월 회기에서 다시 논의될 예정입니다. 📌 CLARITY Act란? 미국 디지털자산 시장의 규제를 명확히 하는 법안입니다. SEC와 CFTC의 감독 권한을 구분해 암호화폐 시장의 법적 불확실성을 줄이는 것이 핵심입니다. 📌 시장 영향 단기적으로는 암호화폐 관련주의 투자심리에 다소 부담이 될 수 있습니다. 다만 일정만 연기된 만큼, 시장은 9월 표결 일정과 통과 여부를 계속 주목할 전망입니다. ⸻ 🍀 기업탐방 중심의 독립리서치 ARIS 👉 http

7 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC325 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @desperatestudycafePhoto

금값엔 이상 없음

6 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC337 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wcforumxyzPhoto

ㅇ 알리움 "스테이블코인 큰 손된 韓, 온체인 못읽으면 외환관리 어려워" - "한국 금융당국이 블록체인 데이터를 들여다보지 못한다면 화폐 관리에서 큰 사각지대가 생길 것이다." - 최근 매일경제와 인터뷰한 에단 찬(Ethan Chan) 알리움(Allium)랩스 공동창립자 겸 CEO는 "한국은 데이터상 이미 월 26억달러를 거래하는 단일시장 중 가장 큰 규모를 가진 스테이블코인 결제 시장"이라면서 이같이 말함. - 알리움랩스는 블록체인 데이터 플랫폼으로 비자, BCG, 코인베이스 등 선도적인 금융기업들이 활용하고 있음. - 특히 비자와 파트너십을 통해 출시한 '비자 온체인 분석 대시보드'도 많은 관심을 받음. - 찬 CEO는 "한국시장은 스테이블코인 거래 규모는 큰데 송금보다는 달러 투자와 가치저장 수단에 가깝게 보인다"면서 "외환 시스템상

6 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC537 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://naver.me/GuC4Vd2K 하나금융그룹이 두나무와 해외송금·결제 사업을 주요 협력 분야로 꼽은 가운데, 이 프로젝트의 기술 파트너로 블록체인 인프라 기업 람다256을 선정하고 지난 6월부터 본격적으로 사업을 진행 중인 것으로 확인됐다. 국내 금융그룹이 블록체인 기반 해외송금·무역대금 결제를 특정 기술 사업자와 함께 실행 단계로 끌어올린 것은 이번이 처음이다.

6 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC423 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @desperatestudycafe

와 이건 좀 쌘데? https://m.sedaily.com/article/20076505?ref=naver

6 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC599 viewsread 7 August 2026

[엔화 스테이블코인 JPYC, 539억원 투자 유치] 엔화 스테이블코인 발행사 JPYC가 시리즈 B 라운드에서 총 60억엔(539억원) 규모의 투자를 유치했다고 더블록이 전했다. 이번 라운드에는 AZ-COM과 마루와가 등이 참여했다. 당초 JPYC는 시리즈 B 라운드에서 28억엔 규모 투자를 유치했다고 밝힌 바 있다.

6 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC564 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

배추도 , RWA로 할 생각을 하네요 ( 재미있네 ) 근데 요즘 폭염에 배추가 밭에서 다 녹는다 하던데 . 오히려 인삼 같은게 더 RWA 상품으로는 좋지 않을까..

6 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC541 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.dnews.co.kr/uhtml/view.jsp?idxno=202608051522515580923

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @itcenstorwa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 984,525 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“아이티센글로벌(STO/RWA/스테이블코인)공부방” (@itcenstorwa), 2,851 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itcenstorwa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.