한화 시큐리타이즈 최대주주 https://news.nate.com/view/20260721n20142

Channel
코식이의 보석함🌈 ㅣ크립토 주식
@norisknoreturn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,453subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001532068845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @norisknoreturn |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/norisknoreturn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 5,453 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 5,466 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 5,472 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 5,474 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 5,474 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 231.1%
- avg views ÷ 5,453 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,600
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 May 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 12,600 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
코인베이스 블랙록 리플까지 뭉쳤다...오픈USD, 스테이블 판도 바꿀까? 써클 -17% https://m.coinreaders.com/245412
2030 적극적 투자자 대상 설문입니다. 시간되시면 한번씩 참여를 부탁드려봅니다🙏🏻 https://forms.gle/k2bDScPF4ADFjP659
SK하이닉스가 오늘부로 비트코인 시가총액을 넘어섰습니다 19일 달러 기준 SK하이닉스 시총 $1.32T vs BTC $1.26T
이러면 블록체인도 아니고 KB가 발행한 것도 아니잖아
🌟KB국민은행, 은행권 최초 블록체인 기반 디지털채권 발행 https://n.news.naver.com/article/015/0005297257?sid=101
주식에 먼저 찾아온 알트불장
네이버 주가가 오르는 것과 두나무 주주는 전혀 상관이 없지만 그냥 오르면 다 좋지머 ...
조용히 36.8만원
여기서 하나 더 생각해볼거는 네이버는 두나무와 9월말 합병 예정인데 교환비율은 1대 2.54 (두나무:네이버파이낸셜)로 이미 확정 네이버 주가가 이렇게 계속 올라서 유지만하면 두나무 주주도 신나겠군여 두나무 주식 1주를 가진 주주는 합병 법인(네이버파이낸셜)의 신주 2.54주를 받는식
Photo, posted without a caption
🌟삼성증권•삼성SDS•삼성카드 두나무 지분 전략적 투자 https://www.ilyoseoul.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=517675
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @norisknoreturn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 729,068 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코식이의 보석함🌈 ㅣ크립토 주식” (@norisknoreturn), 5,453 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/norisknoreturn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.