Channel
@curious_for_good
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
407subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001719485196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curious_for_good |
| Created | 13 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curious_for_good |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 407 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 408 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 409 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 409 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
530 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 116 | 21.9% | |
| 🥰 | 115 | 21.7% | |
| 😁 | 92 | 17.4% | |
| 💩 | 44 | 8.30% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 6.04% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 5.66% | |
| 🤣 | 26 | 4.91% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 3.21% | |
| 🙈 | 16 | 3.02% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 1.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 1.51% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 1.32% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 0.566% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.377% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Особое очарование Еревана в том, что ты можешь идти по обычному спальному району и наткнуться на руины церкви 12 века, рядом с которыми местные выгуливают своих собачек. И от одного из них узнать, что у соседа в огороде стоит обелиск предположительно 8 века. Ненуачо)))
❤25❤🔥8🔥6
Каким-то образом мы докатились до жизни, в которой у нашей кошки появился собственный гастроэнтеролог. И этот гастроэнтеролог наказала нам фотографировать кошкино говно и складывать в отдельную папочку для дальнейшей диагностики. Уитывая, что этим летом мы никуда особо не ездим, да и вообще мало выходим из дома, потому что на улице гребаные +40, моя галерея стала выглядеть 💩 весьма неоднозначно💩 Уже предвкушаю, как…
💩44🤣19😁12👍1
Коробочное решение
🥰34❤3
Кекнула с иллюстраций в статье о подкожном котоукалывании
🥰26
Photo, posted without a caption
😁24❤13👏2
Кстати, 4 года назад я говорила Саше, что гавайские рубашки ужасны, омерзительны, безвкусны, и чтобы он по возможности не носил их никогда И где я сейчас?.....
❤19😁18👍7
Саша заказал на Тему ещё одну порцию гавайских рубашек, и теперь мы можем выходить из дома в костюмах долбоёбов весёлых миллениалов хоть каждый день🥰
🥰44👏4
Сомнительные интерьерные решения: расплющенная собака на полу в вет.клинике
😁25🙈16🤣7😐3
Вчера приложенька-органайзер решила по личным причинам стереть нахуй с лица земли все мои записи о предстоящих делах и планах, все мои списочки на разные случаи жизни, которые я собирала годами 😬 Я чувствую себя как потерявшийся котёнок, который теперь не знает, во сколько у него маникюр, свободен ли он утром во вторник и сколько пар носков нужно брать в поездку. Смартфоны были ошибкой. Я бл в миллиметре от того, ч…
😢30😱15🤯6👍2💔2
...а Кошбке ну очень понравился запах костра от одежды
❤23🥰11
Посетили элитную пловную вечеринку😎 (Роскошные у нас рубашки, а?)
❤33🔥11
Кто-то обронил
😱17😁13🌚7
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @curious_for_good. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 373,847 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Любо пытно” (@curious_for_good), 407 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curious_for_good.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.