9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,839–10,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:45
10,855
+1
13 Aug 2026, 11:16
10,854
-6
12 Aug 2026, 13:08
10,860
-14
11 Aug 2026, 13:04
10,874
-4
10 Aug 2026, 14:55
10,878
-60
9 Aug 2026, 15:21
10,938
-4
8 Aug 2026, 12:41
10,942
-7
7 Aug 2026, 13:38
10,949
-6
7 Aug 2026, 05:48
10,955
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
51.3%
avg views ÷ 10,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,570
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (12 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
128,130
Reactions total
15,617
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
17,276 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
10,166
58.8%
❤
2,496
14.4%
🔥
2,255
13.1%
💔
978
5.66%
❤🔥
625
3.62%
🦄
346
2.00%
🐳
218
1.26%
🍾
123
0.712%
🍓
69
0.399%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 26 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onedrinkplease. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
7.69%
2 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
7,340
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,890
over 24 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjee1orB
1
13 July 2026
13 July 2026
2VSb5wD98wC
1
28 July 2026
28 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вот, кстати, гешефты новой взрослой дружбы.
В этом году у меня появилась Саша. Мы друг друга читали, взаимно восхищались и, пока я обреталась в Москве, решились наконец повидаться.
Встретились в баре, накатили, тут Саша и говорит: слушай, мол, ты же не знаешь никого из моего круга, ни коллег, ни знакомых, ни всяких там, так?
Так.
А значит, если я расскажу, то ты не сможешь никому рассказать, что я тебе рассказала…
Ребята, с которыми я давно сотрудничаю, запустили медиа. Поделились материалами, спросили, вдруг мне, прости господи, откликается.
Окей, кое-что да. Какого хрена после 30 так сложно заводить друзей? И почему раньше было так просто?
Отбросим социальные институты по типу универа, там и жаба с гадюкой подружатся. Интересное началось с появлением интернета.
Старый интернет был сегментирован и тем прекрасен. Вот это — …
Матери, как вы вообще справляетесь с вашей материнской жизнью? Это ж чикчирик пиздец куку что такое.
У меня даже не ребёнок — собака. Собака даже не моя — я просто с ней чуть-чуть живу.
И вот приходим мы на площадку. На площадке Радж самый огромный, остальные размером примерно с бигля. И им, биглям этим, конечно, прикольнее играть друг с другом. Радж хоть и булочка, но лошадь. А когда заигрывается, тогда рычит, что…
Я, кстати, думала завести здесь самозанятость, но вовремя сходила на финансовую консультацию.
Она ничего не стоит и полагается всем новым репатриантам, задумавшим независимое дело.
Дела у меня, понятно, никакого не было. Мечты и слезы, как говорится, цветы и грезы. Но если в Израиле что-то можно получить бесплатно — надо идти и получать. Первое правило нашего бойцовского клуба.
— Представим, — говорю финансовому со…
В первый год репатриации темы с израильскими друзьями были простенькие: война, цены, кукарачи, антидепрессанты, вино по акции.
Теперь, как взрослые, все больше про налоги беседуем. У кого какой бухгалтер. Какой гешефт. Кто сколько в белую, а кто сколько в черную. Это в России самозанятость одной кнопкой управляется, а тут бездна бездн.
— Думаю пикап взять, — размышляет подруга.
— Зачем тебе пикап?
— Это я пока не…
Я почти два года жила одна. А сейчас мы снова снимаем квартиру с Никитой и ОХ УЖ ЭТА ЖИЗНЬ С МУЖИКОМ.
Пошли, говорю, на пляж, кофе выпьем по дороге.
— А КУШАЦ?!
Окей, кушац в кофейне херова туча шекелей. Достаю багет, хумус, сажусь за стол…
— С УМА СОШЛА?! Вчерашний багет не подогреть со сливочным маслицем??
О май гаш.
— Уйди с кухни, смотреть больно. Лучше нарви во дворе мяты.
— ??
— Ты собралась есть хумус…
Ребята в кофейне научили Раджика игре «в какой руке вкусняшка». Он счастлив и со второй попытки всегда угадывает.
Вчера уже в темноте гуляли по пляжу. Не было никого, кроме парня, который глядел на море и курил косяк. А чтобы брызги не намочили, спрятал его в кулаке. Радж немедленно подлетел к парню, сел напротив и ткнул носом в кулак. Вижу, дескать, в какой руке, отдавай.
— Я могу поделиться, — с готовностью предл…
Скачала одно там приложение для изучения языков с помощью нарисованных нейропреподов. Преподов штук пятнадцать, вплоть до вампира. Я выбрала черного парня с дредами в золотых цепях.
Пишу ему:
What’s up my nigga?
А он мне:
I can’t continue this conversation.
Я не поняла, братан. Ты должен отвечать «чо как, сучка? надевай те леопардовые стринги и погнали в клуб». Или «я в участке, детка, внесешь залог?»
Типа — эт…
Реклама одеяла и осознанных снов.
Осознанные сны я взялась практиковать с единственной целью: влететь на вертолете в финальный сезон «Лучше звоните Солу» и спасти Начо.
Нарратив был безупречен. Я — внучка российского олигарха, по уши в черном рынке. Меня разыскивают не только спецслужбы, но и собственный дед, который желает передать мне многомиллиардную империю. А я, гениальный хирург и неземная красавица, хочу про…
Меня позвали в тусовку пляжные деды.
Ну вы знаете этих пляжных дедов — собираются чуть свет, чиллят, курят, читают газеты. Живут свою лучшую жизнь.
Играют, конечно, во всякое, в основном в нарды и тогда выносите святых. Ругаются, кричат, срывают с себя бейсболки и втаптывают их в песок. Обвиняют друг друга в таких подлостях, за которые в иные времена стрелялись с сорока шагов. Потом, страшно довольные, разъезжаются…
Написала, что не желаю комментариев людей, которым не смешны мои шутки.
А ведь это двойные стандарты.
С одной стороны, я мечтаю однажды прийти на российские выборы и чтобы партий в бюллетене — видимо-невидимо.
Партия монархистов, хорошо
бы конституционных. Не падайте дууухом, поруууучик Голицын, корнееет Оболенский, налееейте винааа... Прям захотелось к ним!!
Партия Серп и Молот и Звезда с лозунгом «Вернем твой 3…
Вот думаю, может, террорист Паша не так уж и не прав, что не заводит тут всякие алгоритмы?
С одной стороны, быть блогером в телеграме дорого. За каждого подписчика платишь не железом, но золотом, что есть минус.
С другой стороны, до чего благостная складывается среда. До чего тонкие, интеллигентные люди вокруг. Невольно позабудешь истинный размах плюрализма мнений в интернете.
Написала давеча в соседней соцсети::
…
🤣419❤152🔥63🐳16💔11🦄11🍾5🍓4
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @onedrinkplease. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@onedrinkplease edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 593,365 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Поговорим о вашем отце” (@onedrinkplease), 10,855 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onedrinkplease.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
