Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Что здесь происходит

Channel

Что здесь происходит

@lloyaspsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,281subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603392043
TypeChannel
Username@lloyaspsy
DescriptionКанал психолога про то, как отстать от себя, наладить отношения с другими, хорошо зарабатывать и жить жизнь, которую хочется. https://t.me/olganizaeva здесь канал для экспертов и предпринимателей Рекламу не публикую
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lloyaspsy

Growth

7,2337,2817,2577 August 2026 — 7,242 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,242 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,239 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,233 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,265 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,281 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,226–7,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:067,281+16
13 Aug 2026, 05:277,265+32
10 Aug 2026, 11:307,233-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:407,239-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:317,242no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:277,242first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 7,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held24 (15 May 202617 August 2026)
Views total10,441
Reactions total455
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
313
Videos
7
Links
73

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,801 reactions across 23 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
99755.4%
❤‍🔥28715.9%
🔥18210.1%
💯1357.50%
🎉784.33%
💔422.33%
👍180.999%
🕊120.666%
🙏100.555%
🍾80.444%
🤯60.333%
👏50.278%
🤝50.278%
🤔40.222%
😁30.167%
👀20.111%
😨20.111%
🤗20.111%
😢10.056%
😱10.056%
1 further kind10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,801reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lloyaspsy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC396 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Voice message

Записала подкаст на тему обратной связи. Пишите вопросы в комментариях, если они есть, буду отвечать там же🥰

7❤‍🔥2🔥1

Signed Olga Nizaeva

10 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,120 views24 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие новые люди, пока мы тут обсуждаем тему обратной связи, начните с поста-знакомства здесь и, если вы предприниматель, коллега, эксперт или частный мастер, подписывайтесь на мой второй канал для вас.

12❤‍🔥10👀2

Signed Olga Nizaeva

10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC906 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

И нужно ли разворачивать про то, как учиться воспринимать обратную связь как информацию, а не как свою плохость или нападение, как запрашивать обратную связь и что с этим делать?

  1. Да93%
  2. Хочу другое3%
  3. Просто тык6%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Olga Nizaeva

10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC919 views53 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Есть навык, который редко называют вслух, но который лежит в основе почти всего остального. Речь про способность воспринимать обратную связь от реальности: честный ответ на свои действия и проявления. Я замечаю, что в силу культурного и исторического контекста многим это даётся нелегко. Мы все чего-то хотим, отчаянно и спокойно, у всех есть слабые стороны и пробелы в виденьи себя, это нормально. Чтобы прийти к тому,

37💔11🔥5

Signed Olga Nizaeva

3 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,530 views87 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Что вы чувствуете, когда договоренности в отношениях или в работе не соблюдают? А что вы делаете в таком случае? За годы работы с человеческими отношениями я видела множество таких ситуаций и все они были похожи. Когда близкие не соблюдают договоренности, мы чувствуем злость, обиду, страх, ощущение неважности, ненужности, отвержения. Из этих чувств рождаются разные реакции - отдаление, попытка объяснить еще, еще и е

64💯10❤‍🔥9💔4

Signed Olga Nizaeva

27 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,760 views62 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Готовлюсь ко встрече про отношения и нашла такую вот картинку. Она про ментально здоровье, что тоже актуально, но и проблемы в отношениях очень отражает. Вот есть в этих самых отношениях какая-то проблема. Не критичная, не то, чтобы вот прямо сейчас делает очень больно и это принципиальный момент, но побаливает и периодически прямо мешает жить. Время от времени пара на эту проблему натыкается, тот, у кого сильней бо

41💯14🕊7

Signed Olga Nizaeva

23 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,950 views175 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Вчера мне исполнилось 39 лет. Большую часть этого дня я провела, работая с людьми. Не потому, что я не могла сделать выходной, а потому что хотела делать то, что люблю. Помогать людям возвращаться к себе и идти к жизни лучшего качества во всех сферах, не соглашаться на меньшее, не быть в плену своего прошлого опыта - то, в чем я вижу много смысла и это любовь к делу не прекращается с годами, что я практикую. Когда-то

🎉77❤‍🔥4840🍾8🙏2

Signed Olga Nizaeva

20 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,860 views44 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Дорогие, обещанный анонс для тех, кому отозвались предыдущие посты. 9 августа с 11 до 13.00 мск пройдет бесплатная встреча в зуме. Будем говорить про близкие отношения в современном мире, почему одиночество - большая проблема, несмотря на обилие информации. Разберём: 🔵почему прямота и внимание к другому - это навык, а не знание, и как этот навык нарабатывать 🔵принцип «один диалог - одна тема»: как говорить о сложн

31🔥8🕊5

Signed Olga Nizaeva

17 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC≈2,080 views119 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Когда я училась на факультете журналистики, у нас была классная, но очень строгая преподавательница по практике журналистских расследований. Много лет и еще три образования с тех пор прошло, но я до сих пор помню, как она говорила: ⁃ Запомните, когда вы берете интервью, задавайте только один вопрос за один раз! Продумывайте, терпите, сдерживайте себя, не наваливайте всё и сразу, держите в голове цель. Одна итерация

84🔥26❤‍🔥5💯4

Signed Olga Nizaeva

9 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTC≈2,090 views155 reactionsread 18 August 2026

У меня есть кафе, где я иногда пью чай и невольно становлюсь подслушивателем разговоров. Из последнего - две подруги. Одна говорит: «Опять какая-то ерунда с отношениями. Так классно все начиналось, мы были свободные, влюбленные, казалось, так будет всегда. Чуть меньше года и мы потухшие, равнодушные, наверное, опять придется расставаться и проходить это заново». Я не знаю их конкретной ситуации, но наблюдаю это част

102🔥40❤‍🔥13

Signed Olga Nizaeva

7 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,980 views140 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Привет, друзья! Две недели меня не было в блоге и я бы хотела сказать, что у меня много работы или я решила сделать перерыв на отдых. Но причина была куда банальней: в наших широтах настала жара, а дома сломался кондиционер. Вместе с этим полетел сон, способность мыслить, самочувствие, вдохновение на тексты, все планы развития стали казаться не важными, а из желаний кроме энергосбережения осталось только перестать б

88💯32❤‍🔥13🙏5🤗1😢1

Signed Olga Nizaeva

23 Jun 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,220 views138 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Три месяца назад, прогуливаясь вечером, мы с мужем нашли и забрали с улицы вот этого красавца. Он идеально вписался в угол нашей гостиной, был помыт, полит, к подходящем горшке, только без поддона для полива. Как только открылись магазины, мы пошли искать поддон подходящего размера, но в ближайших окрестностях он не нашелся. Чтобы хоть как-то временно решить проблему, мы взяли в магазине деревянный поднос, а в списк

91💯30🔥15❤‍🔥2

Signed Olga Nizaeva

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @lloyaspsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@lloyaspsy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

И нужно ли разворачивать про то, как учиться воспринимать обратную связь как информацию, а не как свою плохость или нападение, как запрашивать обратную связь и что с этим делать?

  1. Да93%
  2. Хочу другое3%
  3. Просто тык6%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 476,919 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Что здесь происходит” (@lloyaspsy), 7,281 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lloyaspsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.