👍 Новый подарок Только что выпустили мишку 🎂 за 50⭐️ Разрывная от Павла Валерьевича. @Notyou
🏆1🔥1

Channel
@notyou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,618subscribers
-372 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002050065101 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notyou |
| Description | Новый тон здесь и сейчас сотрудничество - @mannft |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notyou |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 49,618 | -51 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 49,669 | -83 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 49,752 | -45 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 49,797 | -41 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 49,838 | -75 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 49,913 | -52 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 49,965 | -25 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 49,990 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 67,845 |
| Reactions total | 1,227 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,153 reactions across 34 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 398 | 34.5% | |
| ❤ | 178 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 122 | 10.6% | |
| 🔥 | 77 | 6.68% | |
| 🤡 | 65 | 5.64% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 5.03% | |
| 🤔 | 54 | 4.68% | |
| custom 5372917041193828849 | 22 | 1.91% | |
| 🤪 | 21 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5404558404565875143 | 20 | 1.73% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 1.56% | |
| 🏆 | 15 | 1.30% | |
| 🤮 | 14 | 1.21% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 1.04% | |
| 🤝 | 11 | 0.954% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 0.781% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 0.694% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.607% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.607% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.52% | |
| 10 further kinds | 31 | 2.69% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notyou. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👍 Новый подарок Только что выпустили мишку 🎂 за 50⭐️ Разрывная от Павла Валерьевича. @Notyou
🏆1🔥1
🏆 Что еще известно по кубкам Изначально улучшение стоило ⭐️ 25 000, минимальная цена будет завтра в 10:15 МСК и составит ⭐️ 4 000. Занятно, что из 240 заявленных кубков выпущено только 220: 🏆 Gold — 16.7% 🏆 Silver — 33.3% 🏆 Bronze — 50% В поле владельца не будет указано имя призера и профиль в целях безопасности — будет только IOAI 2026 Winner. @Notyou
🤣2🔥1🤝1
🏆 Intelligence Cup вышли Призеры начали получать кубки с IOAI 2026, а один из кубков уже улучшили Intelligence Cup #2. Однако Артём (@artem_to_agi), занявший первое место, свой Intelligence Cup #1 пока ещё не получил. Шанс выпадения черного фона сделали сразу 15%. Ну что, ставим ставки, сколько залутает Артем? @Notyou
🔥5❤4🫡2🤔1
🏎 TON готовится к нагрузке Обновление 2026.07 починило то, что сломало 2026.06. Теперь TON Core готовит следующий шаг — 17 августа выйдет 2026.08, которое разделит функции валидаторов и коллаторов: Архитектура готовилась год под запуск нативного Gram Wallet в Telegram, который резко увеличит нагрузку на сеть. Далее ждем увеличение лимитов на размер блока за счёт нового сетевого слоя. В общем, Анатолий Макосов, к…
🔥13🎉6🏆5❤2🤔1
📱 Запуск второго челленджа Официальный аккаунт Telegram Messenger объявил второй челлендж с mini-app: 🛑Вы должны быть разработчиком и рассказать, чем оно полезно; 🛑3 участника получат по 100 USDT; 🛑Необходимо приложить t.me-ссылку на приложение. Срок — 12:00 МСК 14 августа 2026. @Notyou
🤣16👎6❤5👍2🤔2🫡2
🧢 Время работать руками Официальный аккаунт Telegram Messenger объявил челлендж «IRL Moderation»: Участникам предлагается сделать доброе дело в своём районе — убрать парк, помочь соседу с газоном или что-то похожее, и опубликовать фото до и после. Срок — до 13:00 МСК 14 августа. Четверо победителей получат по 100 USDT из Intern Fund. Ждем челендж 24 часа на кассе «Вкусно и точка» за 10$. @Notyou
😁16🔥5🤔2🫡2❤1
🔎 VISION от «Николая Дурова» В сети появился сайт проекта VISION, представленного как «думающий AI» от Николая Дурова — с личной страницей-резюме, LinkedIn-аккаунтом якобы от его имени и 80-страничным whitepaper. Павел Дуров действительно говорил в интервью Le Point (июнь 2025), что его брат работает над AI, способным логически рассуждать, в отличие от обычных LLM. Больше публичных деталей от самого Николая или от …
🤣14❤10🤝7👍3🤔1😁1
😋 Кепка после года игнора Пользователь @allex рассказал историю, как 5 июня 2025 года его аккаунт заморозили, а спустя почти год — окончательно удалили. За это время он трижды обращался к Дурову, отправлял ежедневные запросы в поддержку. Кто-то даже обскамил его на $800 за «помощь». На заблокированном аккаунте осталось 9 подарков: Durov's Cap #443 и восемь Desk Calendar — #260948, #145514, #13127, #78757, #210768,…
😁16❤7👍5🥴3🤔2🤯1custom 53729170411938288491custom 54045584045658751431
🏆 Снова кубки от Дурова Павел анонсировал новую партию наград — на этот раз для Международной олимпиады по информатике в Ташкенте. 235 победителей получат Algorithm Cups общей стоимостью от $117 000. Дуров напомнил, что сам когда-то был близок к этой тусовке — многие в команде Telegram в своё время выигрывали медали IOI. Происходит размывание саплая кубков. @Notyou
🤣17🔥4❤3😁2🤔1custom 54045584045658751431
🔄 Telegram обкатывает раздачу Началось тестирование механизма распределения подарков среди участников Международной олимпиады по ИИ 2026: 🛑Кубки не будут отображаться на внутреннем Маркете Telegram; 🛑Изначально подарок приходит в базовой форме — улучшать или нет, решает сам получатель; 🛑За каждым участником заранее закреплён конкретный номер кубка; 🛑Ценник различается зависит от металла: золотая модель оценена в…
❤10👍4👎3custom 54045584045658751432🤔1custom 53729170411938288491
🏆 Владелец кубка №1 хочет $100к Adler Toberg рассказал, что номера NFT-кубков победителей Международной олимпиады по ИИ (IOAI) будут присвоены согласно итоговой турнирной таблице: Артём Горохов (@artem_to_agi), занявший первое место в личном зачёте, получит кубок под номером #1 — и уже заявил, что готов продать его от $100к. Дуров сообщил, что призы от Telegram (суммарно $106к+) будут переданы победителям на следу…
🤣16❤9🏆5😁2💯1🤔1
📱 Новый баг со звёздами и подарками Раньше рефанд блокировал подарок на 28 дней. Кто-то нашёл способ растянуть блокировку до 689 месяцев — это больше 57 лет. Ждем когда пофиксят. @Notyou
🤣27❤5🔥3🤔2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @notyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 91,331 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@notyou named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@notyou” (@notyou), 49,618 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notyou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.