New all time high! LFG! 🚀

Channel
Trade Notcoin
@not_a_trade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
224,427subscribers
-977 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002110672282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @not_a_trade |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/not_a_trade |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 224,427 | -154 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 224,581 | -145 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 224,726 | -151 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 224,877 | -137 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 225,014 | -138 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 225,152 | -152 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 225,304 | -100 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 225,404 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 10 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
47,890 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5039814603375117204 | 47,890 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47,890reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 6 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
New holders of Notcoin +27% wallets from June 16, the end of the airdrop Such consistent growth shows that interest in NOTCOIN within the community is gradually rising, and the project continues to attract new supporters. 💎
$NOT > $0.01 40% growth in the last 5 days! 💎
Events that changed TON Ecosystem forever 💎💎🐶
Remember vouchers? X Empire launched their pre market with vouchers too https://getgems.io/x-empire The floor price is juicy (80m fdv), could be changed quickly
💎 A hundred days down, many more to go. At the moment, we are: Market Capitalization (Market Cap): $1,097,349,445 (18,214.13 BTC) Ranking: #59 All-Time High (ATH): $0.0294 (550% above the all-time low) Market Cap at ATH: $2.68B All-Time Low (ATL): $0.00452 Current Price: -62.76% from ATH +138% from ATL Popularity on Telegram: The channel @notcoin is in the top 5 of Telegram channels with an audience of over 15…
Where would you prefer to trade $DOGS?🐶
- Binance45%
- OKX9%
- Bybit19%
- In Telegram17%
- DEX1%
- Others8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💎 Heeeere's Johnny! Top 2 in growth over the last 24 hours among the top 100 on CoinMarketCap. +49.43% from yesterday's low, nearly completely absorbing four days of market fear. Just a small step
Market is bleeding, be ready for the next moves 💎
Deflationary and Inflationary Dynamics In the image, you can see a rather interesting comparison of the price-to-market cap ratio of Notcoin, which has a deflationary mechanism, with an altcoin that has an inflationary mechanism. The following formula is used to calculate market capitalization: Market Cap = Token Price × Total Circulating Supply The current market capitalization of the cryptocurrency market is ab…
custom 50398146033751172042,620
Notcoin Explore is officially launched and out of the beta phase! You can now upgrade your level with $NOT or Telegram Stars, which you can purchase directly in Telegram with a card or on fragment.com by paying with $TON. With Telegram Stars, users can pay for digital goods and services not only in Notcoin but also in bots, mini-apps, and the entire Telegram ecosystem. The Gold level increases the base reward rate …
custom 50398146033751172041,790
+45% in 24 hours, still top 50 We are so back 💎
custom 50398146033751172045,710
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @not_a_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Where would you prefer to trade $DOGS?🐶
- Binance45%
- OKX9%
- Bybit19%
- In Telegram17%
- DEX1%
- Others8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 6 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 158,957 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@notcoin · 9,200,677#1
@catapult_extreme · 9,238,991#2
@theyescoin · 6,198,907#3
@dotcoincommunity · 4,251,361#4
@iamalexfalcon · 3,333,265#5
@fx_holding_community · 6,579,954#6
@therealyescoin · 2,207,523#7
@nomis_protocol · 1,632,875#8
@thenoton · 768,799#9
@notcoin_pre_release · 133,228#10
@TonDreamerEng · 792,512#11
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,671,792#12
@dogs · 7,510,360#13
@blumcrypto · 15,640,039#14
@builders · 3,590,321#15
@hamster_kombat · 22,116,787#16
@gram · 7,033,222#17
@catizenann · 3,808,247#18
@hotonnear · 4,947,595#19
@trendingapps · 4,012,931#20
@pocketfi · 1,904,906#21
@Cats_housewtf · 8,671,507#22
@gameechannel · 2,002,345#23
@anon_club · 367,036#24
@watbird · 1,559,940#25
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,300,009#26
@drops_on_hot · 907,842#27
@the_vertus · 2,261,866#28
@notatraderrr · 145,859#29
@notforfans · 151,509#30
@seedupdates · 8,928,757#31
@invest_zonaa · 968,206#32
@tonstationgames · 3,410,346#33
@coinpools · 3,806#34
@notyou · 49,618#35
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,727,957#36
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,659,802#37
@binance_announcements · 3,649,632#38
@tomarket_ai · 7,240,974#39
@clayton · 5,316,593#40
@storm_trade_news · 961,490#41
@DictatorCryptoDCT · 21,663#42
@ToNmetasilense · 2,992,163#43
@fil100 · 105,931#44
@tonkeeper_news · 5,073,539#45
@token_1win · 3,169,397#46
@money · 3,274,381#47
@herewallet · 1,174,978#48
@getgems · 278,417#49
@TONPOINTER · 131,397#50
@toncommunitychannel · 812,552#51
@rockyrabbitio · 3,705,209#52
@fintopionews · 2,454,803#53
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,307,721#54
@avagoldcoin · 1,871,018#55
@storm_trade_news_ru · 570,321#56
@gatto_game · 248,078#57
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,154,498#58
@lostdogscoru · 220,493#59
@tapswapai · 10,939,107#60
@league · 1,053,992#61
@toncoin_rus · 541,574#62
@cryptobotru · 2,448,810#63
@getgemsrus · 111,020#64
@zicelaqo · 172,396#65
@eeusd · 1,203,878#66
@num1_ch · 420,480#67
@LostDogsDictat · 2,998#68
@roxman · 7,884,445#69
@tonkeeper_ru · 473,236#70
@investkingyru · 1,858,517#71
@DeCenter · 1,963,428#72
@MyWalletRus · 284,712#73
@eduardinvest · 1,473,827#74
@notpixel_channel · 4,347,895#75
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,351,236#76
@Anton_cryptoo · 152,573#77
@new_ton_news · 197,408#78
@playweb4 · 149,336#79
@okx_ru · 4,180,426#80
@stonfidex · 759,491#81
@SmerkisCrypto · 18,520#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@NotatraderENG · 520,679
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
@tonraffles_en · 1,338,925
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@xrocketnews · 237,696
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@MyWalletEng · 305,833
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@notforfans · 151,509
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@theopenleague · 155,553
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@getgems · 278,417
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@cryptobotru · 2,448,810
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 August 2026
@new_ton_news · 197,408
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@MyWalletRus · 284,712
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@xrocketnewsru · 185,130
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,154,498
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade Notcoin” (@not_a_trade), 224,427 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/not_a_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.