Posted without readable text
👍5❤3🎉1

Channel
@community_pools
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,111subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002238998849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @community_pools |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/community_pools |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 1,111 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 1,113 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,114 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 1,114 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
201 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 95 | 47.3% | |
| ❤ | 54 | 26.9% | |
| 😢 | 33 | 16.4% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 5.97% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 2.49% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.995% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @community_pools. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2025 to 24 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
👍5❤3🎉1
✊ Acton вышел 11 мая. Мы уже сделали на нем игру 11 мая в TON появился Acton — новый toolchain для разработки смарт-контрактов. Не просто еще одна утилита, а попытка собрать весь путь разработчика в одном месте: от создания проекта и написания контракта на Tolk до тестов и деплоя Это важный сдвиг. Чем проще становится писать контракты, тем быстрее в TON появляются не только токены и NFT, а настоящие on-chain прилож…
👍4❤1
🤑 В TON самый доходный стейкинг — Дуров Павел Дуров в рамках своей программы MTONGA сделал еще одну публикацию, посвященную TON. В этот раз он отметил самую высокую доходность стейкинга среди 50 крупнейших криптовалют — более 18% Такая доходность стала возможна ввиду недавнего обновления Catchain 2.0. Скорость генерации блоков в сети выросла в 6 раз (с 2,5 сек до 400 мс). Поскольку награда валидаторам выплачивается…
👍3
💎 Комментарий Дурова. TON — самый децентрализованный блокчейн? Сегодня Павел Дуров в твиттере написал: "Мало кто осознает, насколько децентрализованной является сеть TON". И это не просто слова для привлечения внимания — за ними стоит сухая математика и коэффициент Накамото Напомним, этот коэффициент показывает, сколько участников сети нужно объединить, чтобы остановить систему или изменить её правила. Чем он выше …
👍4❤2🎉1
Community Pools | Ноткоин / Notcoin пулы pinned a photo
💎 Активность сети TON выросла в 4 раза Экосистема TON за последние 24 часа зафиксировала резкий рост пользовательской активности. Основные причины: 🏦 Стейкинг: Павел Дуров стал крупнейшим валидатором сети (190 млн TON распределены между 50 валидаторами), что значительно усилило децентрализацию сети (по его мнению) 💬 Приток комьюнити: наблюдается массовый переход пользователей из экосистемы Solana в TON, что увелич…
👍5🎉4❤3
✈️ Telegram впервые за несколько лет стал валидатором TON 5 часов назад Telegram публично стал валидатором. Так он официально усилил свою интеграцию с блокчейном The Open Network (TON). Этот шаг знаменует новый этап в отношениях между популярным мессенджером и независимым блокчейном, который изначально создавался командой Павла Дурова В 2019 году команда Дурова сама запускала и поддерживала валидаторы на TON в пери…
👍5❤1
💎 TON в 15 раз быстрее Solana В TON после апгрейда Catchain 2.0 (первого шага MTONGA по Павлу Дурову) транзакция получает полную финальность примерно за 0.8 секунды. Блок создаётся каждые 400 мс, а мощный консенсус позволяет почти мгновенно достигать необратимого согласия между валидаторами. Таким образом, за 400 мс транзакция подтверждается в шардчейне и еще через 400 мс попадает в мастерчейн, после чего становится…
👍3🫡3😢3❤2🤗1
Применение TON, которое мы упустили Еще в 2017 году Telegram описывал Ton Storage, Ton Proxy и Ton Sites как ключевые сервисы экосистемы TON. Вместе они должны были стать основой децентрализованного интернета — без посредников и цензуры Даже без этой высокой цели Ton Storage и Ton Proxy могли бы решать практические задачи современных сервисов и мини-аппов: скрывать IP-адреса серверов (Ton Proxy) для защиты от DDoS-…
😢7👍3❤1
🔓 Что будет с TON после разлока оценкой в $4 млрд? В ноябре ожидаются первые разлоки "TON Believers Fund" — программы 2023 года, где монеты блокировались на 5 лет верующими в TON. Раз в месяц будем наблюдать за разблокировкой новой порции вплоть до конца 2028 года. Каждая по 36.59 млн TON (~$100 млн) Разлоки часто вызывают опасения, ведь логично ожидать давления на рынок. Но стоит помнить: те, кто залочил токены на…
👍7❤4
✈️ Как Павел Дуров мог потерять Telegram в начале пути Сегодня 14 августа — день, который традиционно считается днём рождения Telegram: 12 лет назад вышла его первая версия для iOS. Но путь мессенджера мог оборваться ещё в начале Еще в 2011 году Павел остро почувствовал необходимость в безопасной связи с братом после визитов ОМОН и просьб ФСБ закрыть группы в ВК. В первой половине 2012 года они собрали команду для…
👍5🎉3❤1
🎁 Появился индекс Telegram подарков Storm Trade сегодня выпустил sGIFT — специальный индекс, объединяющий топ-15 Telegram-подарков по капитализации. Его можно использовать просто для отслеживания роста рынка подарков или можно им даже торговать с x1-3 кредитными плечами. Если кратко, это de-fi инструмент, с которым можно вместо подбора каждого NFT вручную сразу "купить весь рынок" и на любую сумму Это интересно, ве…
❤5👍2😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @community_pools. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Отношение к TON сейчас
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 24 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Community Pools | Ноткоин / Notcoin пулы” (@community_pools), 1,111 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/community_pools.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.