Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,681–5,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:39
5,699
-5
14 Sept 2026, 12:59
5,704
-19
10 Sept 2026, 20:39
5,723
-12
5 Sept 2026, 15:15
5,735
-17
1 Sept 2026, 12:14
5,752
-6
29 Aug 2026, 20:58
5,758
-6
26 Aug 2026, 12:12
5,764
-7
23 Aug 2026, 07:48
5,771
-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:33
5,778
-13
16 Aug 2026, 05:43
5,791
-12
12 Aug 2026, 23:28
5,803
-9
10 Aug 2026, 09:58
5,812
-10
7 Aug 2026, 06:03
5,822
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:02
5,822
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
103 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
29
28.2%
❤
28
27.2%
👍
23
22.3%
🔥
5
4.85%
😘
4
3.88%
🤣
4
3.88%
🤬
3
2.91%
👏
2
1.94%
🤪
2
1.94%
👎
1
0.971%
😱
1
0.971%
🤔
1
0.971%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Скидка 5% в Лемана ПРО для новых клиентов: промокод REFB7ZH16S
Действует на первую покупку от 5 000 ₽ с картой лояльности. Максимальный размер скидки 10 000 ₽.
Промокод не действует на следующие товары: с отметкой «Только онлайн-заказ», под заказ, в рассрочку/кредит, а также на доставку и услуги, подарочные карты и упаковочные материалы.
Примените промокод в корзине или сканируйте QR-код на кассе до оплаты. Промок…
Привет, пойдём в Дринкит? Тебя ждёт подарок за заказ на 300 ₽. Скачай приложение, а потом перейди по этой ссылке ещё раз и зарегистрируйся, чтобы друг тоже получил бонуc:
https://app.drinkit.io/activateReferral/r0172KYU5T3N4VUF2G7AKBTAKUPZKEQSKFTCHYJOAYNGIEHWABNGA2DE4DYPJFDSNDFHBWUGTCJNZDVO32BIRLVK2LCNRDWOSBYIJEEYTCXJRSTSTDGMVSUGVBQALBTSEA0?from=%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @OpenLeag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TEC @tecteam · 47,259 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
TON CIS Hub @toncishub · 31,282 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
GRAM TALK @TON_crypto_talks · 31,905 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
degenerative space @degenerativespace · 38,354 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
Gramgochi канал @tongochi_ru · 95,474 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Your Premium | Your Notcoin @premium_not · 44,324 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Sense Ru @sense_foundation_ru · 24,795 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Трамп печатает 💬 @tontiger_cis · 35,069 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Хомяк с TON’а @homyak_s_tona · 24,218 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
Welcome to $FTON @welcometoFTON · 63,992 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
<\> Шардинг, TON'ы, два Жетона </>. @ton2k · 236,968 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Full Metal Jetton @full_metal_jetton · 42,657 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
xRocket News RU @xrocketnewsru · 168,300 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
TON by @korova @tonkorova · 32,600 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
TON Hedge News @ton_hedge · 37,739 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Shardify | by Meridian @shardify · 23,242 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
Vibes @saintvibes · 48,947 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Gsmgarden @gsmgarden · 23,688 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Nemoneta.COM 🍿 @ne_moneta_com · 40,148 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Crypto Vampire @Crypto_newswallet · 43,085 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
@notyou @notyou · 46,846 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
QuestHub [News] ex.brobot @brobot · 61,046 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
TON Newbie 💎 @TonNewbie · 206,254 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
JpegMillionaire @jpegmillionaire · 25,766 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🩸Кровь TON.” (@OpenLeag), 5,699 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpenLeag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.