BroBot is the super cool way to collaborate with top projects on TON
[News] – @QuestHub
[Chat] – @BroChat
[Contests]– @BroContestsBot
[Support] – @BroSupportBot
[Twitter] – x.com/BroBotNews
https://brobot.tg
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 50 days, net -3,035. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,591–64,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 20:20
61,046
-349
18 Sept 2026, 16:39
61,395
-38
18 Sept 2026, 00:39
61,433
-76
16 Sept 2026, 08:58
61,509
-49
15 Sept 2026, 18:57
61,558
-69
14 Sept 2026, 16:15
61,627
no change
14 Sept 2026, 05:18
61,627
-57
13 Sept 2026, 05:18
61,684
-49
12 Sept 2026, 12:15
61,733
-58
11 Sept 2026, 09:40
61,791
-53
10 Sept 2026, 07:59
61,844
-96
8 Sept 2026, 19:01
61,940
-117
7 Sept 2026, 00:01
62,057
-78
5 Sept 2026, 11:59
62,135
-58
4 Sept 2026, 12:16
62,193
-47
3 Sept 2026, 13:58
62,240
-45
3 Sept 2026, 02:17
62,285
-73
2 Sept 2026, 05:12
62,358
no change
2 Sept 2026, 00:05
62,358
-46
1 Sept 2026, 05:14
62,404
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
37
Videos
1
Links
141
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,559 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5330517557839419744
1,302
36.6%
custom 5300737551689079444
950
26.7%
custom 5300847416952510983
862
24.2%
custom 5251448296546786387
379
10.6%
custom 5226715972185908319
66
1.85%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,559 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
186
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
104
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brobot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 January 2025 to 3 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😘 – Congratulations to all participants of the Fiva Protocol Quest!
The winners who will receive prizes: – link google docs
Winners: if you do not receive your prize within 48 hours, please contact support.
[News] | Quests | Chat | X
🔥 – Fiva Protocol Quest!
Easy access to DeFi yield for Telegram users
Detailed instructions on how to complete the tasks – link
Prize pool:
🥇1x Durovs Cap (~2000$)
🥈10x FIVA NFT (~40$)
🥉100x1000 FIVA XP | Read more...
🥇https://t.me/nft/DurovsCap-2650
🥈https://getgems.io/collection/EQDoqr8j1o8up_sMfahYYaUsK7PrPALJiApdHTMbPQwOz-oK
🥉FIVA XP / Points, which can be exchanged for tokens in the future. For more details…
✋ BroBot → QuestHub: a new name, a new mission
We’ve decided to rename BroBot — from now on, it will be called QuestHub.
On the inside, it’s still the same Telegram quest bot, but its purpose and direction are evolving.
😎 Here’s why we made this decision:
Readability and clarity.
Many people didn’t fully understand what “BroBot” was or what it was for.
The name QuestHub speaks for itself: a place where quests live…
😘 – Congratulations to all participants of the contest with barboskich and DeDust.
Winners to receive a limited edition t-shirt from DeDust:
@Jonijoint
@cherepserega
@Vitandi
@no_walter
@karmapenko
@tukhtaev
@KroNiX88
@mcc_live
@art_yudin
@utkows
Please contact our service @BroSupportBot
BroBot [News] | Contests | BroChat | X
❤️ – The contest with barboskich has come to an end. Within 48 hours, we will announce the 10 winners. All participants who managed to earn 650 and 950 XP will receive SBT, congratulations!
BroBot [News] | Contests | BroChat | X
😎 – Congratulations to all participants of the contest with DeDust.
🚀 – 50 prizes of 20 $DUST each have been sent to the wallets of random winners the contest!
😘 – Congratulations to all participants!
BroBot [News] | Contests | BroChat | X
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brobot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@brobot named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tonsociety named in 27 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
@aleronveirhart named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TBook Announcement @tbookincentive · 57,282 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Shardify | by Meridian @shardify · 23,242 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
degenerative space @degenerativespace · 38,354 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
GRAM TALK @TON_crypto_talks · 31,905 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
Not Contest @not_contest · 36,122 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
swap.coffee @swap_coffee · 77,635 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
bemo | TON Staking | Liquid Staking | bmTON @bemofinance · 28,353 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
POVEL DUREV / TON memecoin @poveldurev · 289,796 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
TON Community @toncommunitychannel · 759,347 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Uniton.ai Channel @unitonai · 38,564 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Crypto Oborona @crypto_oborona · 126,689 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,221,671 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Diamond Bazar @tgbtc · 251,989 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
TON Hedge News @ton_hedge · 37,739 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Tonnel Network @tonnel_en · 180,896 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Your Premium | Your Notcoin @premium_not · 44,324 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Sense @sense_ton · 27,420 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Болтоши Болтомото @boltoshi · 51,239 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Новости Web3 | TON Events @ton_events · 66,335 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
xRocket News RU @xrocketnewsru · 168,300 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
TON CIS Hub @toncishub · 31,282 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
Full Metal Jetton @full_metal_jetton · 42,657 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Трамп печатает 💬 @tontiger_cis · 35,069 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
MR TONY 💎 @mr_tony · 253,115 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QuestHub [News] ex.brobot” (@brobot), 61,046 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brobot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.