Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -824. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136,098–137,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:48
136,222
-170
13 Aug 2026, 01:14
136,392
-90
12 Aug 2026, 00:06
136,482
-136
10 Aug 2026, 20:51
136,618
-67
9 Aug 2026, 23:32
136,685
-168
8 Aug 2026, 21:08
136,853
-134
7 Aug 2026, 18:51
136,987
-59
7 Aug 2026, 12:15
137,046
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
137,046
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.16%
avg views ÷ 136,222 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
24 (9 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
50,006
Reactions total
480
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,170
Videos
≈36
Links
≈648
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
620 reactions across 24 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
125
20.2%
🔥
94
15.2%
🤣
48
7.74%
💯
47
7.58%
👀
46
7.42%
👍
39
6.29%
❤
36
5.81%
😢
29
4.68%
🤔
29
4.68%
🎉
25
4.03%
🤝
16
2.58%
🏆
14
2.26%
👌
13
2.10%
🐳
10
1.61%
🤡
9
1.45%
🫡
8
1.29%
😎
6
0.968%
⚡
4
0.645%
💊
4
0.645%
💔
4
0.645%
7 further kinds
14
2.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 620reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 24 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @newcoinopss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Фриланс-платформа в телеграм с расчетами в блокчейне -Talents.tg
Площадка, где заказчик ищет исполнителей, а фрилансер - проекты. Фишка - в прозрачности расчётов:
▪️ Бюджет замораживается заранее - деньги переводятся исполнителю только после подтверждения выполненной работы.
▪️ Вход через Telegram, оплата в GRAM, USDT, NOT и GRC.
▪️ Также доступна коллекция Genesis NFT со случайными привилегиями (премиум-статусы, л…
Я тут подумал🧐
Если взять ту альту, которая в минусе на 70+% и за шортить ее на +-. ту же сумму?) раз все катится в бездну😁 То при падении с текущих еще на 50+% я отобью минус спота🙈
"Гениальная идея"😂
Только когда приходят такие мысли, потом происходит все наоборот😱
P.s. там биток на споте по рынку начали лить, в выходные ночью😳 300 битков в дельте уже...
🟠Сегодня крупнейший разлок акций Spacex ($Spcx),
Сотрудники и инвестора получат 911 млн акций - $100 млрд😱
Незнаю намерены ли они все лить в стакан, или будут холдить, или может есть условия какие при разлоке. Но акции уже упали на 50% с дня листинга. Возможно и уйдут ниже 100$, учитывая обьем анлока то...
С текущих шортить их не хочу, а вот в районе 130-140$ подобрал бы (вдруг дадут)🤔
🟠Параллельно с этим там фон…
Пробую все таки зайти в этот спред под 31% на небольшой сайз (SKHYNIX - лонг и SKHY - шорт) на бинансе.
этот же спред есть между хиперликвид/бинанс, бинанс/битгет.
Сюда бы много не заливал, спред держится уже 20 дней, но сегодня ночью он опускался до 20%, поэтому решил зайти. Будьте аккуратнее, его могут и дальше рвать. В общем повышенный риск тут.
Испания победитель🏆
чуть 2 раза не уснул за матч😁 не такой финал ожидал)
Возвращаемся в крипту👌
😁23💯11🎉7😢3👍2🫡2
Signed DeMassLogica
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @newcoinopss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,586 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Not a Trader @notatraderrr · 145,719 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
zicelaqo @zicelaqo · 172,139 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Not Fans @notforfans · 151,118 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
TON Newbie 💎 @TonNewbie · 218,999 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
<\> Шардинг, TON'ы, два Жетона </>. @ton2k · 250,911 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
TON POINTER @TONPOINTER · 131,059 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
TonDreamer @TonDreamerr · 169,185 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Tonologia @tonologia · 135,153 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
TON Покер Новости @tonpokerroomnews · 203,457 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
OKX Новости @okx_ru · 4,163,622 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
КриптоКабан @TheCryptoBoar · 136,396 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Стукач Трейдит @stukach_trading · 331,970 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Новости Кошелька @cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,152,428 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Крипто Стукач | Инвестиции | Заработок @crypto_stukach · 609,715 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
PRO TRADING SQUAD @PROBLOCKCHAINSQUAD · 297,559 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Криптограм 👾 @cryptogram_web3 · 410,448 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Rouzii Crypto @rouziicrypto · 499,391 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
$Punk DAO @daouptown · 161,516 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Дропы от Стукача @crypto_drop_stukach · 630,356 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Investment kingyru 💎 @investkingyru · 1,853,561 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 August 2026
TON News @new_ton_news · 197,041 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 128,605 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Типичный Инвестор @eduardinvest · 1,468,988 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Финансист | Бизнес | Инвестиции @finansist_busines · 670,215 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Newcoin - Возможности крипты” (@newcoinopss), 136,222 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newcoinopss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.