Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,559. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,399–21,426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 07:39
19,633
-31
8 Nov 2026, 23:10
19,664
-12
7 Nov 2026, 17:50
19,676
-8
6 Nov 2026, 17:38
19,684
-11
5 Nov 2026, 18:45
19,695
-20
4 Nov 2026, 16:41
19,715
-28
3 Nov 2026, 14:46
19,743
-57
2 Nov 2026, 11:50
19,800
-18
1 Nov 2026, 14:26
19,818
-14
31 Oct 2026, 12:28
19,832
-16
30 Oct 2026, 12:09
19,848
-64
29 Oct 2026, 12:31
19,912
-20
28 Oct 2026, 08:39
19,932
-12
27 Oct 2026, 06:36
19,944
-10
26 Oct 2026, 03:38
19,954
-10
25 Oct 2026, 00:07
19,964
-6
23 Oct 2026, 22:36
19,970
-13
22 Oct 2026, 22:17
19,983
-15
21 Oct 2026, 18:40
19,998
-5
20 Oct 2026, 16:05
20,003
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.23%
avg views ÷ 19,633 subscribers
Avg views / post
635
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
90 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
23,491
Reactions total
499
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈228
Links
≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 02s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,242 reactions across 87 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
268
21.6%
⚡
169
13.6%
✍
160
12.9%
😁
136
11.0%
❤
89
7.17%
🕊
70
5.64%
🤔
51
4.11%
👀
33
2.66%
🔥
31
2.50%
💯
27
2.17%
🆒
21
1.69%
🖕
20
1.61%
🤯
19
1.53%
👌
16
1.29%
🤬
14
1.13%
🏆
11
0.886%
👏
11
0.886%
🤷♂
10
0.805%
😱
9
0.725%
👨💻
8
0.644%
19 further kinds
69
5.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (59.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Важный анонс Telegram: приложения прямо внутри сообщений
Теперь интерактивные виджеты внутри сообщения, с прямым взаимодействием с Telegram-кошельком, Bot API и TON Connect.
Фича позволяет размещать платёжные мини-сервисы (магазины), мини-игры, формы заказа, платные опросы, задания с чаевыми, генераторы случайных решений, чек-листы и многое-многое другое.
Фактически это существенный шаг к новой экономике в мессенд…
🚀 xRocket – не всё!
Атака отражена! Хакеры опозорены! Сервис снова в строю!
Команда — молодцы! Быстро заметили аномальщину, пофиксили и через считанные часы перезапустились.
Респект команде!
❓ИИ: вопросы без решений
Использовать ИИ по назначению – не так уж плохо, если учитывать, сколько ценного времени и ресурсов сьедает рутина.
Но давайте подумаем.
А что если компания вдруг отключит свой ИИ для всех – неожиданно или по плану?
Что будете делать, вайбкодеры? Никогда не приходило в голову, что вас подсадили на ИИ-иглу "всемогущества"? И вот вам зависимость. Всё та же – психологическая.
Вы уверены, чт…
Можно расценивать этот пост как поддержку TON или как заявление о продолжении проекта?
Интересно, что под постом много советов от челов, которые точно знают, как построить великую сеть TON. Но почему-то сами ещё не построили.
Часть советчиков — дегены, любители запускать и рагпулить мемкоины. С ними всё понятно.
Но не удалось увидеть комменты другов Дурова или подарочных. Сказать нечего? Подержать некого?
MTONGA?
🤖 Telegram Bot API обновлен до v10.4
Теперь HTML-виджеты прямо в сообщениях. Боты отправляют интерактивные интерфейсы с кнопками, играми и динамическим контентом.
Также есть интеграция с TON Wallet.
Исторический день. Общими усилиями TON Foundation, Грачева с DWF и скамерсантов токен $GRAM достиг $1 и даже ниже.
Поздравлялки всем старателям, кто "строил" ↓ экосистему.
Кстати, сегодня TF продал
259 000 токенов $GRAM из 3-х кошельков – шифруются ребятки.
Зачем? Все и так давно поняли, кто "главный беливер" блокчейна TON.
И всё же вспомним, как в декабре 2022 года рухнула солановская монета $SOL с $260 до $8,13…
В кошельке Telegram тестируют странную механику, схожую с казино. Возможно, что-то связанное с подарками.
Смарт-конракт написал один из кор-разработчиков.
Дальше в игру вступил еще один кошелек, а после тестировать начал Павел Дуров.
И понеслось...
Наконец-то хорошие новости!
В октябре через Fragment прошло платежей на сумму более $27,37 млн в сети TON.
Это говорит о высокой активности в экосистеме и растущем присутствии Telegram в криптоэкономике.
Кроме того, токены TON теперь поддерживаются в одном из старейших некастодиальных кошельков — Blockchain DeFi Wallet.
#Telegram_news #TON_news
Хотя это высказывание с пародийной учетки Дурова в X, мысль заслуживает настоящего аккаунта основателя Telegram:
Каждое поколение приносит технологии, которые переопределяют то, во что люди верят как в возможное.
Блокчейн всё ещё открывает новые способы связи, обмена ценностью и создания цифровых экономик. Компании и проекты, возглавляющие эту трансформацию, могут формировать будущее на десятилетия вперёд.
👍6🕊3
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @weton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@weton edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
JpegMillionaire @jpegmillionaire · 24,211 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Fakhruz @FakhruzTon · 20,170 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
Lozovsky.ton @georgelozovsky · 93,050 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Блокчейн Барышня @blockchain_baryshnya · 22,400 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
Deep Ton @DeepTon · 18,708 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
DeLab Team @delab · 174,117 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
🦄 Max.ton @gramlow · 16,777 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
Pixel NEWS @pixeltemple · 65,090 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Крипто Тетя @aunt_crypto · 19,128 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 September 2026
TON by @korova @tonkorova · 31,868 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Tonnel Network @tonnel_en · 172,526 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
this is TON @this_is_TON · 35,669 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
TonDreamer @TonDreamerr · 151,936 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
TON Инсайдер @TON_ins_ru · 19,519 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
СкуфиТОН @tonskuf · 110,949 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
DeDust.io RU – TON DEX @dedust_ru · 37,467 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 August 2026
Крипто ТВ @CryproTV_ru · 18,247 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 October 2026
Wutmu о TON @WutmuTon · 116,362 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
логово ромчика @togetupblud · 192,607 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
Full Metal Jetton @full_metal_jetton · 41,297 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Болтоши Болтомото @boltoshi · 47,483 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
TEC @tecteam · 44,704 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Crypto Penetration blog 🔩 @cryptopenetration · 33,328 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 September 2026
Новости Web3 | TON Events @ton_events · 62,463 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“We TON” (@weton), 19,633 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.