Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Филатов Дмитрий

@fil100

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

105,931subscribers

-776 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721822897
TypeChannel
Username@fil100
DescriptionTopface, Playneta и другое Для связи: @Fil100_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fil100

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

105,931106,707106,3196 August 2026 — 106,707 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,707 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,620 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,517 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,371 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,268 subscribers10 August 2026 — 106,149 subscribers11 August 2026 — 106,048 subscribers12 August 2026 — 105,931 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -776. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,815–106,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:25105,931-117
11 Aug 2026, 14:57106,048-101
10 Aug 2026, 15:15106,149-119
9 Aug 2026, 18:11106,268-103
8 Aug 2026, 18:17106,371-146
7 Aug 2026, 17:52106,517-103
6 Aug 2026, 20:42106,620-87
6 Aug 2026, 01:33106,707no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:00106,707first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 2 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.95%
avg views ÷ 105,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,070
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held11 (2 March 202617 July 2026)
Views total2,070
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
346
Videos
7
Links
271

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

447 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17639.4%
👍15434.5%
🔥8819.7%
184.03%
🤩81.79%
🥰20.447%
👌10.224%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 11 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fil100. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC≈2,070 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Привет! Меня попросили помочь с продвижением одного продукта для людей, страдающих головной болью и мигренью. Так как я сам знаю про проблему на собственном опыте, не могу пройти мимо. Итак: NeuroWeather — бесплатное приложение для людей, страдающих головной болью и мигренью. Оно помогает вести дневник приступов и автоматически сопоставляет их с погодными условиями. Цель проекта — понять, какие факторы действительн

14👍9

Signed Dmitri Fil

3 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈2,800 views27 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

Тест на ограничения в деньгах Продолжаем познавательные упражнения с собственной психикой. Сегодня изучаем тему денежных ограничений. У меня вот основные на роду написаны оказались 😂 Итак, промпт для вашего AI: Проведи со мной глубокий тест на денежные блоки: психологические, поведенческие, родовые, отношенческие, телесные и эзотерические. Сделай текст по блокам ниже и объясни мне результаты так, чтобы стало понят

17👍10

Signed Dmitri Fil

30 Jun 2026, 10:39 UTC≈2,600 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тест на то, что мы ищем в отношениях Если вы сейчас в поисках любви / партнера или сталкиваетесь с проблемами в отношениях, я хочу посоветовать вам промпт ниже для любого AI, который позволит понять, какая часть проблемы в вас. Это может быть неприятно, но полезно для осознания причин. 🫶🫶🫶 Помоги мне понять мой повторяющийся сценарий в романтических отношениях: какую внутреннюю боль или чувствительную тему я пытаю

104🔥3

Signed Dmitri Fil

29 Jun 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,820 views27 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Лила с ChatGPT Я несколько раз играл в Лилу - кто не знает, это такая игра для самопознания, обычно играется с опытным ведущим (есть аж за 5000 евро за раз ведущие!). Ведущий нужен, чтобы интерпретировать ходы и подсказывать, что нужно осознать на каждой клетке. В Лилу можно играть условно бесконечно, тк есть клетки, которые скидывают вниз, если что-то еще не проработано до конца. Оказалось, что можно бесплатно по

🔥21👍41👌1

Signed Dmitri Fil

13 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,960 views74 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Итоги про счастье Полгода назад я поставил себе цель разобраться в теме счастья. Пора подвести промежуточные итоги. 1. Я точно не разобрался в этой теме и вряд ли разберусь когда-то. Ощущение счастья очень меняется со временем, оно в целом не универсально - нельзя взять список из 10 пунктов, выполнить его и стать счастливым. Всегда будут ньюансы и более-менее уникальные пункты, которые актуальны именно для тебя. Бо

🔥2923👍21🥰1

Signed Dmitri Fil

28 May 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,610 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Потестите, пожалуйста, небольшой сервис, который мы сделали. В него можно прийти с любой актуальной проблемой и попробовать ее порешать: www.kompas.mobi Буду благодарен за любую обратную связь 🙏🙏🙏

12👍2

Signed Dmitri Fil

3 Apr 2026, 08:29 UTC≈6,500 views40 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

ChatVibe Какое-то время назад я скачал свою переписку с подругой из ТГ, залил ее в ChatGPT и попросил проанализировать. Прочитанное взорвало мне мозг, открылись вообще неочевидные вещи и проблемы. Отношения в итоге не сложились, зато осталась идея сделать такой анализ доступным каждому в пару кликов. Мы запилили первую версию такого приложения на обеих мобильных платформах, пока анализ очень ограниченный, зато бесп

🔥1714👍9

Signed Dmitri Fil

31 Mar 2026, 15:54 UTC≈4,780 views67 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Про счастье за март Еще один месяц прошел, отчитываюсь про свои успехи «в поисках счастья». Я почитал книгу The Good Life - она давно у меня лежала на полке, пришло время. Книга основана на результатах знаменитого Гарвардского исследования, в котором в течение 80 лет ученые мониторят уровень удовлетворенности жизнью разных людей, а также факторов, которые на нее влияют. Вкратце, результаты показывают, что ничто так

44👍12🤩8🔥2🥰1

Signed Dmitri Fil

30 Mar 2026, 11:25 UTC≈3,690 views17 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Я ищу сразу нескольких специалистов. Напишите в бота, если вы такой: https://t.me/Fil100_bot 1. AI - маркетолог, обязательно с кейсами успешного привлечения десятков тысяч пользователей в какой-то продукт через AI контент или AI стратегию 🤖 2. Продакт с опытом и интересом в психологических продуктах 🧠 3. Внезапно: специалист по изданию книг 😇 🫶🫶🫶

👍17

Signed Dmitri Fil

16 Mar 2026, 10:54 UTC≈5,200 views76 reactions20 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тревожные времена Последние пару недель меня одолевало фоновое ощущение тревоги: война на Ближнем Востоке, падение рынков, закручивание гаек в РФ, военные на Кипре - все это вместе давит на психику и хочется придумать объяснение, почему все на самом деле нормально и ничего страшного не происходит. Ну или чтобы кто-то сказал, что все будет хорошо. Я углубился в эти тренды и мое личное мнение такое: ЛУЧШЕ НЕ БУДЕТ. Б

👍401714🔥5

Signed Dmitri Fil

2 Mar 2026, 11:48 UTC≈6,070 views65 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что там по счастью Я месяц назад анонсировал свою работу по изучению счастья, и эта тема удивительным образом развернулась у меня в феврале. Я был на ретрите ЕКАМ и в поездке по духовным местам в Египте. Так совпало, что в обоих случаях мы большую часть времени работали над темой внутренних состояний. В двух словах: происходящее в нашей жизни определяется нашим состоянием. Условно, от того, в стрессе мы находимся и

👍3024🔥11

Signed Dmitri Fil

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fil100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,211 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TON News
@new_ton_news · 197,408
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Common Sense Money (by Tim Tursun)
@TimTursunov · 553,782
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Not Fans
@notforfans · 151,509
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
TonDreamer
@TonDreamerr · 169,396
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
TON Newbie 💎
@TonNewbie · 219,589
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
zicelaqo
@zicelaqo · 172,396
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Новости Кошелька
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,154,498
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
OKX Новости
@okx_ru · 4,180,426
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
<\> Шардинг, TON'ы, два Жетона </>.
@ton2k · 251,489
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Trade Notcoin
@not_a_trade · 224,427
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
THE OPEN LEAGUE
@theopenleague · 155,553
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Филатов, Дмитрий Владимирович (предприниматель) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…молодым предпринимателям в своем телеграм-канале{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/fil100/721|title=Телеграм-канал Дмитрия Филатова|website=Дмитрий…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Филатов Дмитрий” (@fil100), 105,931 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fil100.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.