😈
custom 5447480155943492724125,000custom 544719368591981199430,300custom 544761031492739609918,200custom 52111018934591998765,160custom 51931436516471179663,580

Channel
@durov_russia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
992,640subscribers
+651 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001364081847 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @durov_russia |
| Description | Канал для русскоязычной аудитории. Основной канал, который я обновляю чаще, – англоязычный @durov |
| Created | 29 April 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/durov_russia |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 992,640 | -89 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 992,729 | +33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 992,696 | -45 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 992,741 | +55 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 992,686 | +69 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 992,617 | +376 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 992,241 | +252 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 991,989 | first reading |
67 posts held, back to 29 April 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (29 April 2018 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,200,000 |
| Reactions total | 182,240 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,545,294 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 409,972 | 16.1% | |
| 🤝 | 245,010 | 9.63% | |
| custom 5981093588652526830 | 225,830 | 8.87% | |
| custom 5935912783261470019 | 224,770 | 8.83% | |
| custom 5305565863728918192 | 224,530 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5307495098613773492 | 197,000 | 7.74% | |
| 🫡 | 178,900 | 7.03% | |
| ✍ | 152,590 | 5.99% | |
| custom 5447480155943492724 | 125,423 | 4.93% | |
| 😐 | 116,890 | 4.59% | |
| 🏆 | 78,051 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5274195706066781810 | 70,600 | 2.77% | |
| 👎 | 59,952 | 2.36% | |
| 💅 | 56,660 | 2.23% | |
| custom 5384182740411240426 | 48,200 | 1.89% | |
| custom 5447193685919811994 | 30,611 | 1.20% | |
| custom 5983540169528053490 | 26,200 | 1.03% | |
| custom 5389113839608412254 | 19,848 | 0.78% | |
| custom 5773776814354732709 | 19,520 | 0.767% | |
| custom 5447610314927396099 | 18,820 | 0.739% | |
| 4 further kinds | 15,917 | 0.625% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,299,109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2018 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😈
custom 5447480155943492724125,000custom 544719368591981199430,300custom 544761031492739609918,200custom 52111018934591998765,160custom 51931436516471179663,580
🚫 Блокировки лишь отдалили Россию от «цифрового суверенитета». 🖥 Специалисты, которые могли бы создать в России операционную систему для смартфонов, в условиях сломанного интернета массово покидают страну. 📱 А без такой системы все приложения на смартфонах — «национальные» или «иностранные» — остаются уязвимыми для точечной слежки и цензуры со стороны США через бэкдоры и магазины приложений iOS и Android. 🎭 Замена…
👍86,400😐7,840👎2,780custom 5447610314927396099527custom 5211101893459199876419
Мой заместитель, который отвечает за обход блокировок в России, обратился к Роскомнадзору со словами укора и предостережения в виде песни. Текст авторский.
👍33,400👎14,000😐6,850custom 5193143651647117966351custom 5447480155943492724244
Имперская версія 🇷🇺
👍52,800😐16,400👎7,010custom 5211101893459199876202custom 5447480155943492724179
Пора признать, что мой любимый жанр — военные марши 🥁
👍104,000😐52,000👎26,200custom 5447193685919811994186custom 544761031492739609993
File, posted without a caption
👍74,500😐21,100👎6,390custom 5447193685919811994125custom 521110189345919987679
🎵 В 90х я любил создавать свои музыкальные треки в программах вроде FruityLoops. Сейчас возродил это хобби на базе современных инструментов. Буду выкладывать сюда свои композиции под творческим псевдонимом “Дурикович” 😏🇷🇺
👍57,400😐12,700👎3,430custom 5193143651647117966104custom 521110189345919987679
В качестве аргумента за блокировку Telegram и принудительный перевод россиян в другое приложение иногда ссылаются на пример Китая и его мессенджера WeChat. Но это сравнение ошибочно. WeChat не назначали «национальным мессенджером» и не навязывали людям. Он стал абсолютным лидером в свободной конкурентной борьбе начала 2010-х, предложив китайским пользователям лучший сервис из десятков претендентов (среди которых был…
custom 5307495098613773492197,000custom 527419570606678181070,600custom 538418274041124042648,200👍1,190custom 5341444487216388300653
🐣 Сегодня мы запустили децентрализованную сеть для ИИ-вычислений Cocoon («Кокон») — https://cocoon.org. Она обеспечивает пользователям 100% конфиденциальность при взаимодействии с ИИ. Часть запросов Telegram, связанных с автоматическим переводом сообщений, уже проходит через эту сеть. 🚀 Разработчики получают доступ к вычислительным ресурсам по более низким расценкам, чем у централизованных провайдеров вроде Microsof…
custom 5305565863728918192159,000custom 538911383960841225419,600custom 577377681435473270919,000👍282👎142
Папаха никогда не была просто шапкой. Это про то, откуда ты родом, про уважение и дисциплину. Она напоминает нам, что истинная сила приходит из традиции, а не только из мощи. Всему этому меня учил мой отец, когда передал мне папаху. И теперь я передаю её тебе. Теперь любой человек может подарить папаху другу, брату или наставнику — как знак уважения к тому, откуда ты пришёл и куда направляешься. Эксклюзивно в Telegr…
custom 530556586372891819232,500🫡9,700🏆5,410🤝2,810custom 5773776814354732709520
🏆 Студенты из Петербурга заняли первое место в главном международном чемпионате по программированию (ICPC). 👏 Поздравляю с этим впечатляющим достижением чемпионов — Леонида Данилевича, Максима Туревского и Фёдора Ушакова. Ребята представляют СПбГУ — старейший университет России. 🥇 Впервые команда СПбГУ заняла первое место в ICPC в 2000 и 2001 годах, когда в ней участвовал мой брат. С тех пор петербургские студенты …
🏆71,100🫡19,400🤝16,900custom 530556586372891819211,200custom 5389113839608412254248
100% 😺
🤝42,100🫡16,100✍12,400custom 53055658637289181926,360🏆501
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @durov_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 161 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 195 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@durov_russia named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Павел Дуров” (@durov_russia), 992,640 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/durov_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.