🔎 Thousands of years ago, Homer described the biggest mistake most people make. The Sirens promised Odysseus glory and wisdom. Calypso offered him immortality. The Lotus-Eaters offered him the chance to forget everything and stop moving forward. But he kept going. Not because the journey was easy. Quite the opposite: he lost ships, men, and time. More than once, he was pushed far back. But temporary defeats never…

Channel
10kClub Official
@club10k
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,195subscribers
-225 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001641864951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @club10k |
| Created | 11 February 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/club10k |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 9,195 | -24 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 9,219 | -24 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 9,243 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:34 | 9,268 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 9,286 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 9,305 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 9,321 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 9,331 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 9,346 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 9,359 | -24 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 9,383 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 9,400 | -20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 9,420 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 9,420 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 11 February 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8,935
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 13
- of 13 we hold a reading for · 100%
- Most on one post
- 3,040
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @club10k. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2022 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🪖4,000 out of 10,000 domains have already been minted. 40% of the entire #10kClub collection is now gone. 📈Congratulations to all club members on reaching this major milestone. People are starting to realize that 4-digit .ton domains are more than just domains. They are digital identity inside Telegram. 🪙Free renewals. 🪙Forever ownership. 🪙Only 10,000 combinations. The early phase won’t last forever. @club10k
10K Club is now on X. TON is no longer a local story. Telegram has become a global platform, and .ton domains are slowly turning into digital identities for the new internet. We’re stepping beyond Telegram to share TON DNS, Web3, and the community that is building this future right now. Follow us. This is just the beginning. @club10k
🐥In Web2, the market for numeric domains is already closed. All 10,000 four-digit .com domains have long been acquired, and now it’s no longer about “finding something interesting,” it’s about entering with capital. Even the simplest combinations are priced around $3,000–$8,000, solid ones go for $10,000–$40,000, strong patterns reach $100,000+, and top-tier domains like 1111 or 8888 are valued in the millions. This …
Finance 3.0 is important but Web3 is much bigger than just finance. A domain isn’t just a name it’s your address inside the ecosystem. Give us the ability to link .ton to profiles and everything will start working the way it should. Support the vote 🔅 @club10k
Value begins where limitation appears. 🏠These were never just numbers. And never just domains. This is a tool that is only now beginning to reveal itself as part of a larger system. Around 4-digit TON DNS, an ecosystem is gradually forming. Services are emerging that help interpret it — but it’s important not to confuse cause and effect. They don’t create interest — they appear where it already exists. Where people…
🫥10kClub website update We’ve rolled out an update that was long overdue. 👍 Added a “Statistics” section (accessible from the main screen) 👍 You can now dive in and track latest mints and real-time activity 📈The website is no longer just a showcase — it’s becoming a tool to actually understand the market andmake decisions. Our first AI agent Sonny has joined the ecosystem 🦆 And this is not just a “bot for the sak…
🐱10K Club enters its own digital space We’ve started moving the club’s infrastructure to our own platform. On the 10kClub.com you can already: • explore the Tier classification • see the points and scoring system • understand the overall structure of the club It’s important to note — this is an early version of the website. We decided not to delay the launch, but to open access now so the community can already u…
Digital Code in Action: 4N .TON Kicking Off Current status: • Total domains: 10,000 • Already minted: ≈30% • Available: ≈70% Some combinations are already disappearing from the open mint, moving into the hands of holders and collectors. These digital formats historically attract domain investors due to their limited number of combinations and ease of memorization. It’s interesting to watch how the domain distribu…
👁Why 4N domains (10k Club) are the most scarce asset on the TON blockchain Let’s simply look at the math and compare digits to letters. The difference in rarity is massive. ✔️Digits (4N): exactly 10,000 exist There are only 10,000 four-digit combinations on the blockchain: from 0000.ton to 9999.ton. That’s it. Key point: There are no Telegram usernames made of only 4 digits. Therefore, the only way to obtain a pre…
WHY 10KCLUB? If you’ve just joined, the main question is simple: Why 10kClub? Why exactly 4-digit .ton domains? Let’s break it down calmly and to the point. 1️⃣Because there are only 10,000 There are only 10,000 possible combinations from 0000 to 9999. They cannot be increased. They cannot be “printed” again. The range cannot be expanded. This is not marketing scarcity. This is mathematics. In an ecosystem that …
This is the MAP of future infrastructure. Secure your place. Only 10,000 addresses. Millions of users. The math is simple.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @club10k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@web3tondns · 153,7217 postsTheDNS
@thedns · 735 postsДеловой ЛитКлуб
@litclub · 6664 posts+888 ULTRA VIP numbers
@UltraVips · 5,0544 postsCollections of +888 🏴☠️
@collections · 5,9283 postsБизнес Книги Кратко
@biznesknigikratko · 9992 postsKate Smith's Rent
@katesmithrent · 1,1772 posts© 🌐 TON DNS Viewer ᕒ - подписка на Полную версию в закрепе и в БИО
@tondnsviewer · 2922 postsFragment Community 🏴☠️
@FragmentsCommunity · 9591 postRace
@racealiens · 1,3531 postRudisboard.ru
@rudisboard · 1931 postTONкие Инсайды
@TONkinside · 5451 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tontiger_cis · 35,291
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@WutmuTon · 123,833
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
@slowpoke_investments · 24,135
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 September 2026
@fuckthesol · 56,675
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
@jpegmillionaire · 25,766
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
@de_findercapital · 269,567
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@gramlow · 22,563
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@shardify · 23,344
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
@thedailytonrus · 70,194
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
@daolama · 127,957
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
@ton_drift · 44,300
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
@boltoshi · 51,239
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@pixeltemple · 66,488
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@thetonstakers_ru · 148,015
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
@tondiamonds_rus · 83,402
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@ton2k · 239,543
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@theopenleague · 150,619
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@xrocketnewsru · 170,784
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@tonraffles_ru · 103,285
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
@tonnel_en · 177,784
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@primateimpact · 77,071
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@full_metal_jetton · 42,823
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
@tecteam · 47,592
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@tongochi_ru · 96,332
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“10kClub Official” (@club10k), 9,195 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/club10k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.