🪙 Уро, стала доступна монетизация на моем канале - теперь можно браться за канал серьезно и лутать по 1$ в год с просмотров 😂

Channel
Whale Wizard
@whalewizard
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,379subscribers
+38,406 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001799339068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whalewizard |
| Description | Обо всём понемногу🍃 - chat: @whalescove - telegram: @whale_wizard - only DYOR ❗️Информация в канале не является финансовой рекомендацией. Канал ведет обзор-деятельность. Автор не несет ответственность за принятие решений❗️ |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whalewizard |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 39,379 | -23,209 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 62,588 | +61,617 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 971 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 970 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 973 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 972 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 973 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 973 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 22 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.313%
- avg views ÷ 39,379 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 123
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (22 February 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 739 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 167
- Videos
- 20
- Links
- 60
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 672
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 29 we hold a reading for · 28%
- Most on one post
- 408
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whalewizard. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
👀 так нужно что то написать что бы стопки ботов отсыпались Пока не знаю с какой целью нагонялись они, но мне нравится
🆕 Вот данная технолоджия : ГойАлерт
❗В телеграме обнова, новая фича напоминает тебе что ты гой если отправил гифт на скам маркет Вообще не вижу логики в этом оповещении - То есть к тебе приходит чел, наебывает на гифт кидает в блок, а в след за блоком и стирающимся чатом телега напоминает что ты проебался и обскамлен по всем стандартам тона😂
👾 Все под контролем, без паники, это санкционированная накрутка ботов на канал Кто хочет побороться за 1 гифт с 10к 20к 30к 80к ботами и проверить свою удачу велком😂 А пока копим деняк на норм розыгрыш
🧱 Giveaway Finished 🧱 Total tickets: 64197 Winners list: 1. Liberty Figure #259213 - @wxzmc34
👀
♨️ Гудмонинг - Пока в телеге все тихо, Дуров забил хер на др и не выкатил никаких улучшений, закинул какой то пост про др и пошел дальше наполнять ванны с тирамису для своей пассии 🌟 Но мы разумеется не грустим и идем угорать на новый сайт: telegram-gifts.ru 👀 Чел забабахал парсер гифтов которые дарят в режиме реального времени и ленту коментов к ним 😂 Залип я там на пол часа, как вариант убить время на воркиче н
💥 На сколько безопасно это ставить в профиль если опираться на закон 🌟 С одной стороны я собираю редких мишек в 1 экземпляре как коллекционер на основной акк, с другой стороны органам не обьяснишь что это просто гифт Интересная конеш ситуация, где над сделать выбор 👀 Шутейки от Паши с аватаркой выходят на новый уровень… у него то понятно юристы разрулят… а простым работягам че делать😂
Чисто Артемка 😂😂😂 + лут кубка к гемным номерам
👀 Чет слишком много постов, лимит на месяц выполнен, можно не париться В целом по телеге, если в кратце, все скучно. Гифты на дне, грам на дне, ждем ту зе мун Последнее время оч много воркича в ирл, поэтому как то до канала руки не доходят, максимум ток выпрашивать пополнять коллекцию мишек 🤖 Может скоро разыграю лол поп, что бы набрать 50к любимых ботов
🌟 Пока только хайпует и растет в цене его семя, вместо гифтов и Грама
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @whalewizard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whale Wizard” (@whalewizard), 39,379 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whalewizard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.