Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gold Telegraph ✪

@GTelegraph

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,321subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185166270
TypeChannel
Username@GTelegraph
DescriptionGold, News, Commentary, and The Unmasking of Economic Truths. 🌍
Created11 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GTelegraph

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

6,430 average views per post against 5,321 subscribers — an engagement rate of 120.9%. Across the 8,336 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 3.55% and 20.0%, with a median of 9.27%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (1 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled128,652
Mature posts only126.7% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,321 measured 10 August 2026
Cohortb3162:eng · 8,336 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 3.55% · p50 9.27% · p75 20.0% · p90 36.6%
Position in cohort99.388th percentile · 13.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.074% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,3215,3345,327.57 August 2026 — 5,334 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,329 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,321 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,319–5,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:385,321-8
7 Aug 2026, 17:225,329-5
7 Aug 2026, 00:155,334first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
120.9%
avg views ÷ 5,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,430
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (4 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total128,652
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
4,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC542 viewsread 12 August 2026

BREAKING NEWS BRICS NATIONS DISCUSS LINKING PAYMENT SYSTEMS AND CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCIES Things are now in motion. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2087356689259364778?s=46

10 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 12 August 2026

Japan reportedly threw roughly $75 BILLION at defending the yen. The U.S. may have added another $5–10 billion. The yen is already weakening back toward 160 per dollar. This graphic from 2024 was not a joke. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2086931560016519544?s=46

10 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 12 August 2026

Rand Paul is at Fort Knox to see the gold. He also mentions he will be talking about what happened to the dollar when we separated from gold in 1971. Hint: Dramatic debasement. Watch: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2086867784042983607?s=46

8 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈9,170 viewsread 12 August 2026

Canada is sitting on one of the greatest geological treasure chests on Earth. Gold. Copper. Uranium. Nickel. Potash. Diamonds. Lithium. Some of the richest mineral districts ever discovered are buried beneath Canadian soil. Canada has what the world needs. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2086139977750974794?s=46

8 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 12 August 2026

The mining industry doesn’t suffer from a lack of assets. It suffers from a lack of real builders. If there’s no vision beyond year one, run. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2086127151137325501?s=46

8 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC≈8,100 viewsread 12 August 2026

"China's getting close to the levels of gold holdings of the United States... They want to dominate, whether it's the EV space, AI, critical metals, I would say it's the gold space as well." - Sean Boyd Watch: https://youtu.be/GRMFEidAU1w?si=jp1PupSLthFCdco8 This is the leader of the second largest gold producer.

7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC≈3,930 viewsread 12 August 2026

GOLD TELEGRAPH CONVERSATION 17: SEAN BOYD "Gold is doing what it's done for thousands of years... it's a store of wealth, and people are realizing that more and more."p Watch: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2085526663408808378?s=46

31 Jul 2026, 02:33 UTC≈6,450 viewsread 12 August 2026

I have been writing about the Bank of Japan for years, mostly to people who didn’t want to hear it. Everyone insisted Japan was a special case. I always thought it was the preview. You can’t print your way out of problems. You can only choose who pays. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2083018090951196993?s=46

31 Jul 2026, 00:19 UTC≈2,690 viewsread 12 August 2026

BREAKING NEWS THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT INTERVENED IN FOREIGN-EXCHANGE MARKETS TO BUY YEN AND SELL DOLLARS There you go… Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2082938539092889648?s=46

29 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 12 August 2026

The gold price is above $4000. Some of these producers = record margins. We are seeing record central bank buying. You can still buy some of these gold producers at prices that assume none of it is real... Bargain hunting. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2082566388686938238?s=46

25 Jul 2026, 02:03 UTC≈17,200 viewsread 12 August 2026

They tell you China bought 15 tonnes of gold last month Customs says 173 tonnes crossed the border Reports highlight that Goldman hints at the real official bid running up to 5x what's reported... routed through London OTC, into vaults no customs report will ever see Chess... Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2080720403039658069?s=46

23 Jul 2026, 00:02 UTC≈4,470 viewsread 12 August 2026

The man who made one of the greatest trades in financial history has a message for the world: “Gold is becoming the most apt reserve currency in the world, replacing fiat currencies.” - John Paulson The world is starting to play catch up. Read: https://x.com/goldtelegraph_/status/2080080877024166094?s=46

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @GTelegraph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 266,028 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,851
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 149,135
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gold Telegraph ✪” (@GTelegraph), 5,321 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GTelegraph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.