Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4,545. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 833,194–839,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:44
833,876
-913
13 Aug 2026, 07:04
834,789
-434
12 Aug 2026, 10:34
835,223
-590
11 Aug 2026, 13:44
835,813
-800
10 Aug 2026, 12:57
836,613
-388
9 Aug 2026, 16:22
837,001
-668
8 Aug 2026, 15:24
837,669
-653
7 Aug 2026, 15:11
838,322
-99
7 Aug 2026, 12:30
838,421
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:28
838,421
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.107%
avg views ÷ 833,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
892
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.529%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
42 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
37,482
Reactions total
193
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,010
Videos
≈92
Links
≈790
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
193 reactions across 41 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
106
54.9%
👍
36
18.7%
🔥
26
13.5%
👏
6
3.11%
🥰
5
2.59%
🤣
4
2.07%
😁
3
1.55%
😱
3
1.55%
🆒
1
0.518%
🌭
1
0.518%
🐳
1
0.518%
😎
1
0.518%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁 Alphea Airdrop: Points That Convert to Tokens
Alphea is running a points-based airdrop campaign where earned points will be convertible to tokens. Complete daily quests to stack more before the conversion kicks in.
🔹 How to claim:
1. Visit alphea.ai and download Alphea Connect
2. Register with a Google account
3. Go to Referral and enter code JAI90UUQGX (+500 Points)
4. Complete daily check-in and available quest…
🎁 Play Quip Is Giving Away Free $PHYS Tokens
Play Quip has launched a free $PHYS token airdrop — earn by playing a free game and withdrawing straight to your Solana wallet. No buy-in required.
🔹 How to claim:
1. Register at play.quip.gg/airdrop with your email
2. Connect your X (Twitter) account
3. Complete the in-app tutorial
4. Play the free game to earn $PHYS
5. Withdraw tokens to your Solana wallet
🔹 Requireme…
🐕 Binance Moves 499 Billion SHIB in One Transaction
Binance shifted nearly 499 billion Shiba Inu tokens in a single on-chain move, flagged by blockchain analytics platform Arkham Intelligence.
The transfer — 498,891,481,684 SHIB worth approximately $2.25 million — took place on August 11 on the Ethereum network.
Big number, modest price tag: the real flex of SHIB is making billions feel like pocket change.
Trade …
🚨 74% of XST Supply Concentrated in a Few Wallets — Bubblemaps
Bubblemaps found that around 74% of XST’s supply is controlled by a group of connected wallets. The memecoin has been gaining traction on TikTok, but such high supply concentration poses a serious risk to holders.
According to the analysts, the linked wallets may have accumulated XST before the token began gaining traction. A large sell-off from these w…
🎁 MGBX: 10 random participants are giving away 300 USDT
MGBX has launched a contest in X — 10 random winners will each receive 30 USDT. Results will be announced after the end of the promotion.
🔹 What to do:
— Follow MGBX in X and repost the promotion tweet
— Register on MGBX
— Leave a comment under the tweet with your UID
🔹 Terms: Participation is free, no deposit required. The promotion ends on August 17th.
🔹…
🚨 Shibburn Warns SHIB Holders as Crypto Scams Surge
Shibburn, the Shiba Inu community burn tracker, has issued multiple security alerts urging SHIB holders to stay alert amid a wave of crypto threats in 2026.
The warnings flag several active attack types: malicious airdrops, private key/credential theft attempts, fraudulent investment promises, and paid promotions disguised as independent news coverage.
If someone…
🐶 Dogecoin Speculators Are Back — Price Isn't
Dogecoin futures positioning has climbed back to levels last seen in October 2025, when DOGE traded at roughly three times its current price. The coin is down 70% from those highs, but the bulls haven't left the chat.
More than 3-to-1 long positions now outweigh shorts, meaning traders are piling back in even as the price sits deep in the red.
Hopium: still the most ab…
🐕 SHIB Spikes to $0.00001004 on New Australian Listing
Shiba Inu briefly hit $0.00001004 on FameEX, an Australian crypto exchange, immediately after the token's new spot listing went live — triggering a sharp but short-lived price spike.
The move was isolated to FameEX, where thin early liquidity on a fresh listing can cause outsized price swings. SHIB is now available as a spot trading pair on the platform.
New l…
🐶 Dogecoin Leads the Pack While Bitcoin Lags
DOGE jumped nearly 3% to $0.07 and BNB rose 2% to $614, while Bitcoin slipped to around $63,700 — the only major asset in the red on both the day and the week.
Sometimes the dog outruns the king.
Trade on Binance
💀 BitMart may have gone broke on shitcoins
The BitMart situation is getting increasingly ugly, with withdrawals reportedly frozen and accusations of insolvency emerging.
📅 Timeline:
▪️ July 13 — users were offered a 6-month asset lockup to improve liquidity.
▪️ July 26 — BitMart announced it would stop new registrations and shut down on August 27.
▪️ July 27 — only 58 accounts reportedly withdrew $805K in 24 hours…
🎁 Cade Meme Madness — $94,400 USDC Tournament
Cade (Pumpcade), a Solana-based memecoin prediction platform, is running a free 7-day tournament where players predict Up or Down on fast-moving memecoins for a share of $94,400 in USDC.
🔹 How to claim:
1. Register at cade.market with an email, verified through Privy
2. Connect a Solana wallet and sign the verification message
3. Confirm you're 21+ and accept the terms
…
👍1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @memecoin_daily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 638,605 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tomo Cat Community @tomo_cat · 2,273,414 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Unicorn Crypto Academy @unicorn_crypt · 520,382 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER @CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,620,928 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Hedgehog in the fog @hedgehoginthefogen · 269,273 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
CRYPTO JOKER @CRYPTO_jokker · 2,139,634 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 August 2026
INSIDER UK | News @INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,242,296 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
$BEER 2.0 @beercoinchannel · 721,496 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER USA | News @INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,445,119 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,195,799 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Airdrop Oracle @airdrop_oracle · 750,151 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
WUFFI Announcements @wuffi_announcements · 1,157,017 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten @INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,160,939 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Era | Trading, News, Airdrops @CryptoEraEng · 176,272 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Web3Key @Web3key_eng · 475,083 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
INSIDER | News | Politics | USA @INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,872,287 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Soothsayer @cryptosayer · 798,249 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Bogdan & Xena RU @Bogdan_and_Xena_ru · 141,967 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
CashFlow‘s Calls @CashFlowsCalls · 538,171 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 308,035 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
$WATER | SOL MEMECOIN @watersolmeme · 1,183,582 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
GameGPT | Announcements @gamegptANN · 124,270 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
GT Protocol Announcements Channel @GTProtocolNews · 256,126 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Дропы от Стукача @crypto_drop_stukach · 630,356 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Haydar Sabiev | Crypto Investor @HaydarCrypto · 105,582 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
5 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Memecoin daily” (@memecoin_daily), 833,876 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memecoin_daily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.