Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 41 of the 42 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 332 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -57,827. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 520,669–621,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 13:07
532,284
-975
10 Nov 2026, 09:56
533,259
-605
8 Nov 2026, 23:47
533,864
-710
7 Nov 2026, 18:31
534,574
-660
6 Nov 2026, 18:37
535,234
-454
5 Nov 2026, 21:49
535,688
-624
4 Nov 2026, 19:10
536,312
-480
3 Nov 2026, 21:14
536,792
-372
2 Nov 2026, 21:38
537,164
-493
1 Nov 2026, 20:39
537,657
-605
31 Oct 2026, 20:28
538,262
-565
30 Oct 2026, 18:59
538,827
-600
29 Oct 2026, 18:11
539,427
-591
28 Oct 2026, 20:09
540,018
-832
27 Oct 2026, 19:30
540,850
-680
26 Oct 2026, 15:54
541,530
-375
25 Oct 2026, 13:30
541,905
-470
24 Oct 2026, 12:51
542,375
-583
23 Oct 2026, 13:47
542,958
-538
22 Oct 2026, 15:47
543,496
first reading
Engagement
336 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 209 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.309%
avg views ÷ 532,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,650
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.272%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 336 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
336 (1 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
151,438
Reactions total
394
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,924 reactions across 323 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
570
29.6%
🔥
365
19.0%
👍
334
17.4%
😱
154
8.00%
🤯
91
4.73%
👀
89
4.63%
👏
68
3.53%
🐳
55
2.86%
😁
53
2.75%
👎
47
2.44%
🤩
32
1.66%
⚡
31
1.61%
🏆
19
0.988%
😎
16
0.832%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 330 of the 336 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,924 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 336 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏦 Индийские власти обыскали биржи CoinDCX и Delta
Enforcement Directorate — финансовая разведка Индии — провела обыски в криптобиржах CoinDCX и Delta в рамках расследования о нарушении валютного законодательства. Ведомство подозревает компании в незаконных трансграничных переводах криптоактивов.
Обе биржи заявили 6 ноября, что торговля, пополнение счетов и вывод средств работают в штатном режиме. Delta отдельно опр…
🌐 Южная Корея разрешит биржам замораживать вывод при угрозе взлома
Южная Корея готовит новые правила для криптобирж: платформы смогут временно блокировать депозиты и вывод средств, если заподозрят хакерскую атаку.
Поводом стали недавние инциденты с корейскими биржами — GOPAX превентивно приостанавливал работу сервисов, а Prabang потерял $70 000 из горячего кошелька. Помимо права на заморозку, биржи обяжут усилить м…
🏦 Россия разрешила биржам торговать криптовалютой с ноября
Банк России опубликовал указ, открывающий путь к легальной торговле криптовалютой на отечественных биржах. Старт возможен с 22 ноября 2026 года — но только после того, как регулятор одобрит торговые правила каждой конкретной площадки.
Указ зарегистрирован Министерством юстиции России. Московская биржа при этом ориентируется на запуск с 1 декабря — чуть позж…
📰 iOS 27.2.1 не закрыл уязвимость, угрожающую крипто-кошелькам
Apple выпустила обновление iOS 27.2.1, которое устранило девять уязвимостей — но так и не закрыло брешь worse_query, способную раскрыть данные криптовалютных кошельков, хранящиеся в открытом виде.
На проблему обратила внимание компания SlowMist: уязвимость позволяет обойти песочницу iOS и получить доступ к чувствительным данным кошельков. О находке сооб…
🟠 Биткоин упал до $73 700 на фоне данных по инфляции США
Горячие данные по инфляции в США спровоцировали резкое падение Биткоина и волну ликвидаций на крипторынке.
Индекс потребительских цен (CPI) оказался выше ожиданий, что усилило опасения по поводу высоких процентных ставок. На этом фоне BTC опустился до $73 700, а общий объём ликвидаций на крипторынке составил $723 млн. Дополнительное давление оказали отток сре…
🌐 Alta привлекла $47,5 млн на блокчейн для банков
Финтех-компания Alta объявила о закрытии раунда Series A на $47,5 млн. Общий объём привлечённого финансирования достиг $80 млн. Компания строит блокчейн-инфраструктуру для банков и финансовых институтов с акцентом на конфиденциальность, соответствие регуляторным требованиям и глобальную совместимость.
В сеть Alta планирует подключиться Airwallex — финтех-платформа д…
🟠 BlackRock вывел $1,66 млрд из биткоин-ETF за семь сессий подряд
Биткоин-ETF от BlackRock (IBIT) фиксирует отток уже седьмую торговую сессию подряд — суммарно из фонда вышло $1,66 млрд.
В один из дней IBIT потерял $213,2 млн, а эфирный фонд ETHA — ещё $119,3 млн. Итого за одну сессию два продукта BlackRock лишились около $332,5 млн. В понедельник все американские спотовые биткоин-ETF вместе показали отток на $201 …
🌐 XRP Ledger готовится к защите от квантовых компьютеров
XRP Ledger Foundation представила план перехода на квантово-устойчивую защиту аккаунтов. Владельцы смогут добавить новый квантово-защищённый ключ и отключить старый — без дополнительных комиссий.
По дорожной карте полный переход сети должен завершиться к 2028 году. Квантовые компьютеры в перспективе способны взламывать классические криптографические ключи, по…
🟠 Strategy докупила 1 036 BTC и выкупила акции STRC на $188 млн
Strategy приобрела 1 036 BTC за $81,9 млн в период с 2 по 8 ноября 2026 года. Средняя цена покупки составила $79 012 за монету. Сделка раскрыта в форме 8-K, поданной в SEC.
После этой покупки общий запас биткоина у компании достиг 850 364 BTC. Параллельно Strategy потратила $188,3 млн на обратный выкуп привилегированных акций STRC, а общий объём доллар…
🟠 Биткоин упал ниже $74 000: ликвидации превысили $1 млрд
За 15 минут в воскресенье вечером биткоин рухнул с $75 690 до $73 477 — это минимум за долгое время. Падение произошло на фоне низкой ликвидности выходного дня.
Среди причин — скандал вокруг Nvidia и срыв переговоров по Ирану, которые ударили по настроениям рынка. В результате резкого движения ликвидации по крипторынку превысили $1 млрд.
Источник
Trade on …
🏦 Binance закрывает майнинг-пул: почти нулевая активность
Майнинговый пул Binance фактически прекратил работу ещё до официального закрытия. За последнюю неделю он нашёл всего один блок в сети Bitcoin — это почти нулевой результат для некогда заметного участника рынка.
Пул будет официально закрыт 10 ноября. До этого момента он практически исчез из списков по производству блоков Bitcoin.
Источник
Trade on Binance
💵 Samsung добавил USDC на Solana в 82 млн устройств
Samsung интегрировал поддержку USDC на блокчейне Solana — теперь стейблкоин доступен на 82 миллионах устройств компании.
Это расширяет доступ к USDC для миллионов пользователей Samsung по всему миру напрямую через их устройства.
Источник
Trade on Binance
🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 336 posts we hold for @crypto_stukach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 11 posts on @crypto_stukach as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Финансист | Бизнес | Инвестиции @finansist_busines · 591,642 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Стукач Трейдит @stukach_trading · 299,071 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Азбука Криптана @Kripto_Azbuk · 278,895 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,080,043 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Крипто Вестник @crypto_vestnic · 200,335 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Сергей Сергиенко @sergeisergienko · 60,267 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
Антон про крипту @Anton_cryptoo · 137,630 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER @CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,429,186 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Hedgehog in the fog @hedgehoginthefogen · 254,201 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
ПОЛУНИН @polunintrade7 · 485,474 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
INSIDER UK | News @INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,110,740 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Харківський Саньок @Sanek_Kharkiv · 144,966 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
INSIDER USA | News @INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,289,044 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Что говорят киты? 🐋 @whaletalks · 50,300 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
$BEER 2.0 @beercoinchannel · 685,529 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
ТОНИ КРИПТАНА @TonyCryptoTrade · 80,825 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Крипта с Александром @crypt_investing · 64,956 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Newcoin - Возможности крипты @newcoinopss · 124,259 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Tomo Cat Community @tomo_cat · 1,974,425 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Unicorn Crypto Academy @unicorn_crypt · 498,936 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
Руслан Пашкевич | Крипто-темы @Crypta_Pashkevicha · 104,070 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Tonologia @tonologia · 120,805 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
INSTARDING @INSTARDING · 94,341 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Ринат Садыков | Easy Invest @EasyInvestCrypt · 100,305 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
13 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто Стукач | Инвестиции | Заработок” (@crypto_stukach), 532,284 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_stukach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.