🚀 Since 2017. Built for degens, traders and crypto explorers. Daily market insights, breaking news, airdrops, hidden gems, on-chain trends and the narratives shaping the next cycle. Stay curious. Stay early.
Advertisement: @TGowner999, @topovik_999
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +3,194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,086,953–1,096,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:24
1,095,492
+7,254
11 Aug 2026, 16:21
1,088,238
+171
10 Aug 2026, 17:51
1,088,067
-324
9 Aug 2026, 20:55
1,088,391
-1,478
8 Aug 2026, 23:54
1,089,869
-1,011
8 Aug 2026, 00:26
1,090,880
-1,418
7 Aug 2026, 05:01
1,092,298
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.145%
avg views ÷ 1,095,492 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.573%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
43 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
66,544
Reactions total
381
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,730
Videos
≈115
Links
≈1,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 22 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 18of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 12 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 15.3% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 51.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 1,090 views — 0.099% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 1,203).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
381 reactions across 42 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
265
69.6%
👍
63
16.5%
🔥
30
7.87%
🤯
15
3.94%
😁
4
1.05%
😱
3
0.787%
👎
1
0.262%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 Goldman Sachs Acquires Bitcoin & ETH Income ETF Provider for $2.25B
Goldman Sachs is acquiring NEOS Investments for up to $2.25 billion — adding ~$30 billion in assets and 19 options-based income ETFs to its asset management arm. The deal is expected to close in Q1 2027.
NEOS runs the Bitcoin High Income ETF, Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF and Ethereum High Income ETF, putting Goldman directly in the crypto yiel…
💚 Get 100 USDT from QZINO 💚
Start playing on QZINO and make the most of your free bonus.
🎁 50 USDT with promo code 50TAPS
😌 50 USDT for new users via the link
➡️ No KYC
Only the fastest will manage to claim the promo 😉
Register now and claim your bonus ➡️ HERE
⚖️ Senate's CLARITY Act vote sets up a 'crucial' September for crypto
September is shaping up as a pivotal month for the industry, with two major catalysts converging: a Senate vote on the CLARITY Act and the Federal Reserve's September FOMC meeting.
The CLARITY Act aims to establish a clear regulatory framework defining when digital assets are commodities versus securities — a distinction that has kept billions in…
🚨 Harmony exploited: 4 billion ONE tokens minted, price craters 30%
An attacker minted approximately 4 billion ONE tokens without authorization — roughly 26% of the token's total supply — in an exploit flagged by on-chain analyst Juiceberg. ONE dumped more than 30% to an all-time low as the newly minted tokens moved through the network.
Harmony has confirmed the exploit and asked exchanges to freeze funds linked to…
🔁 eToro buys TradeZero for $231M as crypto revenue drops 73%
eToro has agreed to acquire US brokerage TradeZero for up to $231 million in a cash-and-stock deal — its third acquisition this year. The move hands eToro a fully licensed US broker-dealer with options trading capabilities, something it has lacked since launching stateside.
The timing is telling. Crypto trading among eToro users fell 73% year-over-year, w…
📊 SeerDEX Presale Pulls $225K With Framework Ventures Reportedly in Talks
SeerDEX has raised $225K in its ongoing presale, with Framework Ventures — early backers of Synthetix and Aave — reportedly in discussions around the project.
No deal is confirmed yet, but the combination of early capital traction and interest from a fund with that track record is drawing attention before the project reaches later presale sta…
💻 Musk plans $16.8B "Terafab" chip factory in Texas
SpaceX and Tesla are planning a chip manufacturing facility called Terafab in Grimes County, Texas, with a projected cost of $16.8 billion. The facility would span over 100 million square feet — roughly five times the size of the world's current largest building.
Source
⚖️ SEC votes this week to launch its first major crypto rulemaking
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is set to vote this week on initiating a formal rulemaking process under a proposed framework called "Reg Crypto" — designed to support certain digital asset offerings.
This would mark the SEC's first major crypto-specific rulemaking, signaling a shift from the enforcement-heavy approach of recent years to…
🔷 Vitalik's new Ethereum roadmap puts quantum safety and privacy first
Vitalik Buterin has scrapped Ethereum's old six-phase roadmap and replaced it with a new architectural blueprint he calls "Lean Ethereum" — what he describes as the protocol's "third major iteration."
The updated direction puts two priorities front and center: post-quantum resistance and first-class privacy. Buterin is also factoring in AI as a …
Important reminder:
We are holding a Giveaway from Telegram! 📱 Subscribers who have met the conditions (subscribing to channels in our network) are waiting for 5 prizes: 6 months of Premium! ⭐️
Check your participation and invite friends 🤩
⚖️ BIP-110 UASF launches with just 2.53% miner support
A new User-Activated Soft Fork pushing BIP-110 has gone live on Bitcoin, with only 2.53% of miners currently signaling support — setting up what could be the most contentious Bitcoin governance battle in years.
UASFs bypass miner consensus by having nodes enforce new rules directly, effectively forcing miners to comply or risk their blocks being rejected by the…
₿ Bitcoin clears $65K as traders eye July CPI
Bitcoin briefly broke above $65,000, buoyed by renewed U.S. spot ETF inflows ahead of Wednesday's July CPI print — the next major data point that could shape Fed rate expectations.
A softer inflation reading would strengthen the case for a September rate cut, a scenario that has historically supported risk assets including crypto. Traders are watching the report closely…
👍6❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @degen_Crypto_Hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 682,251 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Drop Club @drop_cryptogo · 1,543,960 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Pulse Nigeria @Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria · 981,708 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Nairaland Pulse | News @Nigerii_News · 949,978 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Nigeria Football Hub @Football_Nigeria · 1,348,918 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO JOKER @CRYPTO_jokker · 2,151,029 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 August 2026
Rubber Ducky Calls @rubberduckycalls · 150,947 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Unicorn Crypto Academy @unicorn_crypt · 521,111 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten @INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,163,877 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Naija Sports Hub @Naija_Sports · 933,433 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Sports Hub | Football @Sport_HUB_football · 1,464,940 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Life @cryptolifebro · 1,122,973 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER | News | Politics | USA @INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,886,289 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER @CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,630,338 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
NEVERSOL @never_sol · 631,016 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto soothsayer @cryptosayer · 800,531 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin @coinpost · 256,709 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Naija Profit Zone @Naija_free · 1,114,683 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER UK | News @INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,249,951 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER USA | News @INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,457,105 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,205,829 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto News @currentcryptonewsdaily · 1,086,159 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Meme Foundation @CryptoMemeFoundation · 1,977,796 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 August 2026
$WATER | SOL MEMECOIN @watersolmeme · 1,186,051 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Hedgehog in the fog @hedgehoginthefogen · 269,700 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
12 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DEGEN Crypto Club” (@degen_Crypto_Hub), 1,095,492 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degen_Crypto_Hub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.