15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -683. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,855–50,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 01:04
49,957
-52
21 Aug 2026, 13:12
50,009
-46
20 Aug 2026, 14:04
50,055
-36
19 Aug 2026, 11:38
50,091
-46
18 Aug 2026, 10:34
50,137
-42
17 Aug 2026, 12:46
50,179
-43
16 Aug 2026, 05:44
50,222
-98
14 Aug 2026, 15:14
50,320
-40
13 Aug 2026, 04:07
50,360
-44
12 Aug 2026, 06:12
50,404
-54
11 Aug 2026, 05:52
50,458
-54
10 Aug 2026, 03:41
50,512
-58
9 Aug 2026, 00:51
50,570
-45
7 Aug 2026, 22:38
50,615
-25
7 Aug 2026, 12:18
50,640
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
220
Videos
9
Links
108
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50
48.1%
🔥
18
17.3%
🍾
16
15.4%
👍
10
9.62%
🤔
3
2.88%
🤯
3
2.88%
👀
2
1.92%
😍
1
0.962%
🤷♂
1
0.962%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The two safest positions to be as a man is all-in or all-out.
The concept of dipping your toes in the water is a fallacy invented by cowards.
Nothing is more dangerous than going "half-in" on something.
Use your resources wisely to test, but always have an end goal in mind you're willing to go all-in on.
And always set a higher standard for yourself than you believe you can accomplish.
That gap between your stan…
We're printing money here!
Guys.
The crypto market sentiment USED TO BE important when it was all about retail buyers.
Since the Bitcoin ETF on January 11, 2024...what WE retailers think has far less impact on the market.
Institutions hold 34% of the entire market (public stats), but the number is far larger.
That means it's still printing money, but you're too busy checking other people's feelings.
Get started…
Our Network invested over 153000$+ within a week
Making upto 1% Daily Passive income
Join the community if you think it’s fit for you !!
https://telegram.me/+R5iNO4uHD8VmNGIy
Join this private Group only few slots left
https://t.me/+R5iNO4uHD8VmNGIy
Don’t join if you are airdrop hunter or freebies
There will be nothing for you
Here is the results
If you haven’t locked your positions yet
Do now and get guaranteed Spilover and Earn easily 500-10000$/ Day
Minimum you can start with 10$ USDTBEP20
Make Sure you have Locked Your Positions
get paid from anyone who will join after You
Look at the 1100$ Structure
Your Slot $100
$50x20 $1000
10 cycle $1850
90 days $6600 total Profit
Lock your Positions Now
We are investing in some personal funds in BITAI LLM
If you are interested in to earn passive income you too can
It’s a crazy passive income opportunity
Even in 1050$ can earn upto 6650$ in 90 Days
Main wallet 50$ and then 20 accounts each one by main account 50$
Lock Your Position, Even you can start with 10$
Anyone join with this link will get automatically spilovers
Crypto used to be a thing for nerds.
Then it shifted into "you're cool" if you're in it.
It then created a trend of influencer junkies being all-in on crypto and being a "free-spirit".
Some have notoriously gone all-in on meme coins selling all assets in the hopes of becoming multi-millionaires.
Just the above points had the entire crypto marketcap above USD in circulation!
Institutions then got involved.
And n…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @shibaaiadmin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,506,917 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shiba Ai Announcements 📣” (@shibaaiadmin), 49,957 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shibaaiadmin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.