Today, TON Strategy Company announced our financial results for the third quarter of 2026. Highlights include: ➡️Held ~235.1 million GRAM at September 30, 2026, including approx. 232.9 million GRAM deployed in staking. The Company’s digital assets had a fair value of approx. $348.5 million as of September 30, 2026. ➡️Earned ~9.4 million GRAM during the third quarter of 2026, consistent with the prior quarter. The …

Channel
TON Watcher 💎 👀
@TON_WatcherGuru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,903subscribers
-8,068 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002007408487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TON_WatcherGuru |
| Description | TON Everyday Ads & Enquiry @Tomiwahxyz Discussion Group - @TONwatcher_Group |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TON_WatcherGuru |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 07:37 | 68,903 | -129 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 11:18 | 69,032 | -97 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:50 | 69,129 | -128 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:17 | 69,257 | -93 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:34 | 69,350 | -52 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:09 | 69,402 | -97 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:48 | 69,499 | -99 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:30 | 69,598 | -86 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:06 | 69,684 | -94 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 69,778 | -96 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:44 | 69,874 | -100 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 69,974 | -91 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 70,065 | -98 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:19 | 70,163 | -110 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:35 | 70,273 | -53 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 70,326 | -65 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:04 | 70,391 | -89 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 70,480 | -74 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 70,554 | -117 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 70,671 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.334%
- avg views ÷ 68,903 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 230
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (14 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,073 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 10:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 502
- Videos
- 90
- Links
- 391
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 21s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
TON Foundation sold 259,000 $GRAM a few hours ago, using three different wallets to obscure the transaction trail.
BREAKING 🚨 ⚠️ One answered Telegram call could get you hacked. Update the app to the latest version now.
BREAKING 🚨 JUST 2 DAYS TO HALLOWEEN DAY https://www.hutya.fun/ Best time to stay positioned CA- EQB8aGdDjjB2eVkSuobWIrwChWPADpHxvmubwrGoQb-ZrZzW
🚨 BREAKING: Users are reporting issues claiming their locked tokens on the TONRaffles Locker, while the team appears unresponsive to complaints. ⚠️ Exercise caution when using this platform until these issues are addressed. DYOR and protect your assets. 🔒
4 DAYS TO HALLOWEEN DAY https://www.hutya.fun/ CA- EQB8aGdDjjB2eVkSuobWIrwChWPADpHxvmubwrGoQb-ZrZzW
BREAKING Ton is now on Pumpfun
Start Loading up on OG Halloween Utya. Halloween day is just 9 days away. Durov said Halloween Utya and Skitty are his favourite stickers. btw he mentioned Halloween first :) https://www.hutya.fun/ CA- EQB8aGdDjjB2eVkSuobWIrwChWPADpHxvmubwrGoQb-ZrZzW
Telegram Wallet: Ecosystem Guidelines — dApps: Update to the latest version of TON Connect. If your dApp uses ton_proof, verify that your implementation complies with the specification. — Explorers: We recommend adding support for identifying and displaying Telegram Wallet accounts, displaying key rotation actions, and labeling gasless transactions (example). — Standalone non-custodial wallets: When creating walle…
new crafts detected 🎁 Redo_edwd248Uiwssid — 31 new models 🐈⬛ @GiftChanges • Portals ❤️ • Tonnel 🌪
ALICIA coded 👀
💸 If your wallet doesn’t look like this, don’t even bother sending me money for my birthday! 🎂
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @TON_WatcherGuru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @TON_WatcherGuru as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 27 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 9 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 6 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@tonstatus · 151,5523 postsAlicia GRAM ($ALICIA)
@AliciaGRAM · 392 postsGift Crafts 🎁
@GiftChangesCrafts · 4,0701 postRubic Announcements
@cryptorubic · 11,7581 postSTON.fi
@stonfidex · 711,9671 postTelegram News
@telegram · 9,146,9501 postTonstakers
@thetonstakers · 851,6231 postTON Strategy Co. (NASDAQ: TONX)
@tonstrat · 5,7601 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@tonstatus · 151,5522 postsBlum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 12,771,0351 postBlum Trading Bot
@BlumCryptoTradingBot · 15,2301 postPavel Durov
@durov · 10,056,8631 postGift Changes 🎁
@GiftChanges · 118,3831 postWen Lambo? Now!
@lambospeak · 57,1271 postPortals Market
@portals · 438,7281 postTelegram News
@telegram · 9,146,9501 postToncenter API
@toncenter_news · 1,2271 postTonnel Relayer Bot
@Tonnel_Network_bot · 169,2871 postTonstakers 💭 Community
@tonstakers_community · 47,7541 postWalt News (ex. Wallet)
@walt_news · 3,284,2921 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@notcoin · 7,833,486#1
@blumcrypto · 12,771,035#2
@hotonnear · 4,290,950#3
@catizenann · 3,305,663#4
@dotcoincommunity · 3,626,600#5
@catapult_extreme · 7,579,455#6
@theyescoin · 5,148,896#7
@walt_news · 3,284,292#8
@gameechannel · 1,767,834#9
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 705,687#10
@gram · 6,218,751#11
@Cats_housewtf · 7,014,870#12
@the_vertus · 1,969,811#13
@builders · 3,233,909#14
@the_signal_24 · 5,384,854#15
@therealyescoin · 1,932,234#16
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,300,220#17
@hexnio · 1,835,454#18
@storm_trade_news · 852,879#19
@smpl_app · 1,498,141#20
@watbird · 1,368,822#21
@WagmiHub_News · 1,010,560#22
@CloutCoinSol · 897,472#23
@binance_announcements · 3,205,251#24
@clear_feed_media · 465,749#25
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,060,521#26
@thenoton · 638,664#27
@anon_club · 307,918#28
@w3bflix · 628,315#29
@memecoin_daily · 784,412#30
@timecoinsol · 643,694#31
@xyro_io · 891,856#32
@roolzGods · 1,219,410#33
@true_ecosystem · 197,568#34
@onchainchain · 702,060#35
@BBQCoinTeam · 872,942#36
@architecton_tech · 1,828,711#37
@cosmobear_io · 706,395#38
@fintopionews · 2,027,871#39
@drop_cryptogo · 1,327,326#40
@stonfidex · 711,967#41
@Naija_free · 936,053#42
@OGC_Announcements_Hub · 432,280#43
@TonDreamerEng · 657,771#44
@coin_capybara · 183,259#45
@cedex_io · 1,023,857#46
@bittonapp · 313,222#47
@thetonstakers · 851,623#48
@arewacryptoPros · 356#49
@pocketfi · 1,644,000#50
@trendingapps · 3,546,023#51
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,537,885#52
@gemswall · 1,276,558#53
@pixelverse_xyz · 2,894,550#54
@avagoldcoin · 1,591,927#55
@wuffi_announcements · 1,079,395#56
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,115,087#57
@tea_solmeme · 1,091,452#58
@metazoneofficial · 520,758#59
@Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria · 829,244#60
@storm_trade_news_ru · 501,643#61
@watersolmeme · 1,079,130#62
@aquaprotocolxyzchannel · 410,813#63
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,036,482#64
@matchain_fam · 1,593,540#65
@dailyscan_en · 912,703#66
@airdrop_oracle · 703,424#67
@Nigerii_News · 809,820#68
@pumpers · 448,944#69
@hellopixelapp · 243,813#70
@investkingyru · 1,570,393#71
@sergeisergienkoen · 2,761,151#72
@simplewalletcrypto · 1,109,498#73
@iceblockchain · 1,167,785#74
@pocket_rocket_game · 642,338#75
@degen_Crypto_Hub · 941,950#76
@AtheneNetwork_Ann · 678,488#77
@Sport_HUB_football · 1,250,821#78
@Naija_Sports · 794,057#79
@wave_announcements · 688,579#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ToluwalogoAgboola · 21,155
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@PastorKesiena · 22,603
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON Watcher 💎 👀” (@TON_WatcherGuru), 68,903 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TON_WatcherGuru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.