⚖️ US-Supremegericht startet mit brisanten Fällen ins neue Term Der Oberste Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten beginnt sein Oktober-Term mit einer Reihe richtungsweisender Verfahren. Auf der Agenda stehen Fälle zu Klimaschutzregulierung, Waffengesetzen, religiöser Diskriminierung im Bildungswesen, Elternrechten sowie mehreren verfassungsrechtlichen Grundsatzfragen. Quelle

Channel
INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten
@INSIDER_Nachrichten
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,105,758subscribers
-65,509 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002092230336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @INSIDER_Nachrichten |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/INSIDER_Nachrichten |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 1,105,758 | -10,948 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 1,116,706 | -2,315 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 1,119,021 | -2,602 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 1,121,623 | -2,380 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 1,124,003 | -2,513 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 1,126,516 | -4,833 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 1,131,349 | -3,062 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 1,134,411 | -1,564 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 1,135,975 | -1,351 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 1,137,326 | -1,787 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 1,139,113 | -1,097 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 1,140,210 | -1,388 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 1,141,598 | -1,258 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 1,142,856 | -1,284 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 1,144,140 | -1,057 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 1,145,197 | -1,394 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 1,146,591 | -1,293 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 1,147,884 | -2,576 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,150,460 | -2,301 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,152,761 | first reading |
Engagement
183 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.072%
- avg views ÷ 1,105,758 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 796
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.961%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 183 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 87 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 183 (1 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 72,398 |
| Reactions total | 674 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 04:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 77 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (2 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 74 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 17 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 21.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 56.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 450 views — 0.041% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 481).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /336326 Sept 2026, 19:36 UTC | 1715 minutes – 9.1 hours old | 185 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 89 interp. → 3.0 hours: 144 interp. → 6.0 hours: 162still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 63 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /336226 Sept 2026, 14:27 UTC | 2628 minutes – 14 hours old | 323 views6 reactions | 60 minutes: 83 interp. → 3.0 hours: 174 interp. → 6.0 hours: 261 → 12 hours: 314still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /336126 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC | 3621 minutes – 20 hours old | 378 views3 reactions | 60 minutes: 87 interp. → 3.0 hours: 165 interp. → 6.0 hours: 233 → 12 hours: 355still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /336025 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC | 552 minutes – 32 hours old | 480 views3 reactions | 60 minutes: 115 interp. → 3.0 hours: 202 interp. → 6.0 hours: 232 → 12 hours: 302 → 24 hours: 448still climbing at last reading | 448measured | 6.9 hours |
| /335925 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTC | 6116 minutes – 37 hours old | 483 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 85 interp. → 3.0 hours: 168 → 6.0 hours: 282 → 12 hours: 349 → 24 hours: 430still climbing at last reading | 430measured | 5.1 hours |
| /335825 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTC | 6216 minutes – 37 hours old | 431 views4 reactions | 60 minutes: 109 interp. → 3.0 hours: 185 → 6.0 hours: 261 → 12 hours: 333 → 24 hours: 391still climbing at last reading | 391measured | 4.3 hours |
| /335725 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC | 6729 minutes – 42 hours old | 448 views4 reactions | 60 minutes: 100 → 3.0 hours: 187 interp. → 6.0 hours: 281 → 12 hours: 360 → 24 hours: 410still climbing at last reading | 410measured | 4.5 hours |
| /335624 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC | 7533 minutes – 2 days old | 532 views8 reactions | 60 minutes: 103 interp. → 3.0 hours: 173 interp. → 6.0 hours: 193 → 12 hours: 267 → 24 hours: 455 → 2 days: 519still climbing at last reading | 455measured | 12 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
1,379 reactions across 176 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 317 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 248 | 18.0% | |
| 🤬 | 210 | 15.2% | |
| 🤔 | 100 | 7.25% | |
| 👏 | 99 | 7.18% | |
| 🔥 | 62 | 4.50% | |
| 😁 | 55 | 3.99% | |
| 👎 | 48 | 3.48% | |
| 😨 | 46 | 3.34% | |
| 😱 | 46 | 3.34% | |
| 😢 | 33 | 2.39% | |
| 💔 | 32 | 2.32% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 1.02% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 0.87% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 0.87% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 0.58% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.508% | |
| 👾 | 4 | 0.29% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.29% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.218% | |
| 11 further kinds | 19 | 1.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 183 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,379 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 183 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇨🇳 USA und China einigen sich auf Zollsenkungen und KI-Kanal Nach einem dreitägigen Staatsbesuch von Chinas Präsident Xi Jinping in Washington haben die USA und China eine Einigung in acht Punkten erzielt. Beide Seiten vereinbaren Zollsenkungen auf Waren im Wert von jeweils 30 Milliarden US-Dollar sowie die Aufnahme neuer Gespräche über Künstliche Intelligenz. Zudem soll ein gemeinsamer Kommunikationskanal eingeric…
❤4🤔1😁1
🇺🇸 Trump streicht 810 Mio. Dollar an Bundesmitteln Das Weiße Haus hat angekündigt, 810 Millionen US-Dollar an vom Kongress parteiübergreifend bewilligten Bundesmitteln zu streichen. Die Entscheidung stieß umgehend auf scharfe Kritik aus beiden Lagern des US-Parlaments. Abgeordnete von Demokraten und Republikanern bezeichneten den Schritt als rechtswidrig, da der Kongress die Mittel bereits genehmigt hatte. Details …
🤬2😁1
🇨🇳 Trump kündigt zwei weitere Treffen mit Xi Jinping an US-Präsident Donald Trump hat bestätigt, dass er den chinesischen Staatspräsidenten Xi Jinping noch zweimal in diesem Jahr treffen wird – nach dessen dreitägigem Staatsbesuch in den USA. Trump gab dies auf seiner Plattform Truth Social bekannt. Eines der Treffen soll im November in China am Rande des APEC-Gipfels stattfinden. Dies wäre ein weiterer hochrangige…
❤2👍1
👑👑 Already have VIP status at another casino? Don’t start from scratch — transfer your VIP status to Qzino in just a few minutes and get instant access to VIP benefits. 🟢 VIP Level 30 immediately after approval 🟢 Up to 40% cashback 🟢 Up to 300% rakeback 🟢 No KYC required 🟢 Personal VIP Manager 🟢 Higher limits and exclusive rewards 🎁 Extra bonuses for your activity: 😌 Wager $10,000 within 7 days → get a $100 bonus…
🇨🇳 Chinas Unterdrückung der Uiguren: verdeckter, aber nicht beendet Laut aktuellen Berichten hat China seine Repression gegen die uigurische Minderheit nicht eingestellt, sondern in verdecktere Formen überführt. Die Maßnahmen seien heute schwerer zu dokumentieren als zur Zeit der offen betriebenen Masseninternierungen in Xinjiang. Statt sichtbarer Lager setzt Peking demnach verstärkt auf juristische Instrumente, en…
👏2❤1🤔1
🌍 Eklat bei UN-Vollversammlung: Dutzende Delegierte verlassen Saal bei Netanjahu-Rede Beim dritten Tag der UN-Generalversammlung in New York kam es zu mehreren Zwischenfällen. Dutzende Delegierte verließen den Saal, als Israels Ministerpräsident Benjamin Netanjahu ans Rednerpult trat – ein sichtbares Zeichen der Ablehnung seiner Politik im Gaza-Krieg. Jemens international anerkannte Regierung appellierte vor der Vo…
👍2😁2
🚢 EU und USA wetteifern um Abschiebedeal mit afrikanischen Ländern Die USA haben bereits rund 35 Vereinbarungen mit afrikanischen Staaten geschlossen, um Migranten abzuschieben – oft ohne Auflagen. Washington zahlt dafür teils Millionenbeträge. Die Europäische Union versucht nun, ähnliche Abkommen zu schließen. Als erstes Zielland gilt Ruanda, mit dem Brüssel derzeit Gespräche führt. Damit entwickelt sich die Absch…
🤬5👏2❤1
🇺🇸 Trump empfängt Xi zu Gipfeltreffen in den USA Donald Trump hat den chinesischen Staatspräsidenten Xi Jinping mit großem protokollarischem Aufwand in den USA empfangen. Das Treffen markiert den Beginn eines hochrangigen Gipfels zwischen den beiden Großmächten. Bei den Gesprächen sollen Themen wie Künstliche Intelligenz, Seltene Erden, Handel sowie geopolitische Fragen rund um Iran und Taiwan auf der Agenda stehen…
😁4❤1👏1🤔1
🌍 UN schützt Staatlichkeit von versinkenden Inselstaaten Die UN-Generalversammlung hat per Konsens eine wegweisende Erklärung verabschiedet, die sicherstellen soll, dass Inselstaaten ihre Staatlichkeit nicht verlieren – selbst wenn ihr Territorium durch den steigenden Meeresspiegel teilweise oder vollständig unbewohnbar wird. Die Erklärung bekräftigt, dass betroffene Länder ihren Status als Völkerrechtssubjekte sow…
🔥3👍2🤔2❤1
🕌 Trump droht Iran im UN-Sicherheitsrat mit Vernichtung US-Präsident Donald Trump hat bei einer Rede vor dem UN-Sicherheitsrat damit gedroht, Iran zu „vernichten", während er sich gleichzeitig als „Friedensstifter" bezeichnete. Trump äußerte die Drohung im Rahmen seiner Ansprache vor dem höchsten UN-Gremium. Konkrete diplomatische Schritte oder Bedingungen nannte er dabei nicht. Quelle
🤬6❤3👍2
⚖️ Britischer Aktivist schnitt Schlauchboot mit Migranten auf Der rechtsextreme britische Aktivist Daniel Thomas, bekannt als „Danny Tommo", hat im Ärmelkanal ein Schlauchboot mit einem Messer aufgeschlitzt – während sich ein Rettungshelfer an Bord befand. Er streamte den Vorfall live. Die Polizei hat das Videomaterial inzwischen zur Prüfung sichergestellt. Thomas ist in Großbritannien als Anti-Migrations-Aktivist …
👍4🤔1🤬1😨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 183 posts we hold for @INSIDER_Nachrichten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,185,207#1
@CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,144,637#2
@INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,774,773#3
@CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,521,901#4
@INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,376,326#5
@cryptosayer · 774,971#6
@finansist_busines · 620,476#7
@degen_Crypto_Hub · 1,023,714#8
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,473,393#9
@GTM_TON · 839,919#10
@gameechannel · 1,882,229#11
@be_the_firsttt · 1,299,105#12
@monorixofficial · 1,320,600#13
@CRYPTO_jokker · 2,027,438#14
@wuffi_announcements · 1,122,179#15
@memecoin_daily · 808,719#16
@airdrop_oracle · 727,082#17
@beercoinchannel · 704,275#18
@watersolmeme · 1,140,826#19
@hedgehoginthefogen · 261,709#20
@dogs · 7,065,215#21
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#22
@Sport_HUB_football · 1,350,223#23
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171#24
@notcoin · 8,552,225#25
@crypto_drop_stukach · 5#26
@tomo_cat · 2,127,414#27
@crypto_stukach · 563,644#28
@drop_cryptogo · 1,428,234#29
@unicorn_crypt · 509,453#30
@theyescoin · 5,634,397#31
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#32
@trendingapps · 3,784,156#33
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,234,054#34
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,171,582#35
@gram · 6,641,039#36
@fx_holding_community · 5,999,312#37
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#38
@dotcoincommunity · 3,940,724#39
@catapult_extreme · 8,398,685#40
@seedupdates · 8,102,878#41
@catizenann · 3,550,802#42
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#43
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#44
@boomloudcoin · 1,653,140#45
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#46
@money · 2,932,436#47
@richbeaknewss · 659,792#48
@proxymtproto · 11,940,791#49
@cryptolifebro · 1,047,206#50
@vestirussia · 975,954#51
@sergeisergienkoen · 3,099,972#52
@currentcryptonewsdaily · 1,025,345#53
@invest_zonaa · 909,960#54
@Sanek_Kharkiv · 150,212#55
@tea_solmeme · 1,176,954#56
@cryptoAIAGI · 1,042,282#57
@hexnio · 1,998,607#58
@ToNmetasilense · 2,730,678#59
@kripota4 · 694,128#60
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#61
@hash_cats · 2,064,245#62
@richbeaknews · 579,608#63
@architecton_tech · 2,014,381#64
@CryptoMemeFoundation · 1,836,756#65
@biznest0n · 665,957#66
@amazingworldtravel · 1,020,986#67
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,507,910#68
@EraOfExplorers · 715,471#69
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#70
@Kripto_Azbuk · 293,747#71
@NewsPlayToEarn · 2,296,166#72
@iMTProto · 7,597,568#73
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421#74
@polunintrade7 · 519,867#75
@nomis_protocol · 1,536,662#76
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,112,277#77
@tu_crypto_news_en · 664,055#78
@avagoldcoin · 1,753,173#79
@builders · 3,409,127#80
@tons_base · 481,242#81
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#82
@Cats_housewtf · 7,850,625#83
@learn2earnings · 1,824,340#84
@VenomFoundationOfficial · 879,859#85
@babydogecoin · 1,019,704#86
@sportscryptoinsider · 826,931#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,185,207
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,144,637
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,774,773
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,376,326
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
@finansist_busines · 620,476
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@Dr_farhadi20 · 41
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
@memefiicoiin · 87,930
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptosayer · 774,971
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
@notcoinbazzz · 149,001
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
@Perspoliis_chanel · 130,914
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
@Romankhone · 22,622
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
@Stakesportbeting · 103,187
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
@CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,521,901
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@newsweek21 · 21,862
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 22 September 2026
@Bogdan_and_Xena_ru · 136,530
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@CryyptoPlus · 159,404
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@zapas_tapswap · 139,376
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
@fanashpazii · 25,437
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 September 2026
@ashpazbashe96 · 20,882
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 September 2026
@Sport_HUB_football · 1,350,223
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
@cakesara · 26,495
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
@AirdropsAlertPro · 42,130
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@Airdrop_iirani · 139,262
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@hedgehoginthefogen · 261,709
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
10 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten” (@INSIDER_Nachrichten), 1,105,758 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INSIDER_Nachrichten.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.