Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 308 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -52,602. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 694,436–762,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 18:10
702,326
-1,098
10 Nov 2026, 12:59
703,424
-687
8 Nov 2026, 23:40
704,111
-834
7 Nov 2026, 12:59
704,945
-535
6 Nov 2026, 09:25
705,480
-552
5 Nov 2026, 10:28
706,032
-457
4 Nov 2026, 11:36
706,489
-501
3 Nov 2026, 08:44
706,990
-444
2 Nov 2026, 11:18
707,434
-468
1 Nov 2026, 09:45
707,902
-422
31 Oct 2026, 11:07
708,324
-499
30 Oct 2026, 09:01
708,823
-499
29 Oct 2026, 12:36
709,322
-412
28 Oct 2026, 14:46
709,734
-459
27 Oct 2026, 18:07
710,193
-440
26 Oct 2026, 19:31
710,633
-480
25 Oct 2026, 17:59
711,113
-458
24 Oct 2026, 18:07
711,571
-341
23 Oct 2026, 15:08
711,912
-565
22 Oct 2026, 16:56
712,477
first reading
Engagement
312 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.117%
avg views ÷ 702,326 subscribers
Avg views / post
822
88 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.362%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
88
of 312 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 88 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
312 (14 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
72,294
Reactions total
187
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 03:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈22
Links
≈1,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,285 reactions across 285 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
487
37.9%
👍
359
27.9%
🔥
117
9.11%
😱
103
8.02%
👏
79
6.15%
👎
39
3.04%
🤯
21
1.63%
👀
14
1.09%
🥰
14
1.09%
😎
8
0.623%
😢
8
0.623%
🐳
4
0.311%
😁
4
0.311%
👻
3
0.233%
👾
3
0.233%
🤡
3
0.233%
🍌
2
0.156%
🤗
2
0.156%
🤝
2
0.156%
🤣
2
0.156%
9 further kinds
11
0.856%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 287 of the 312 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 312 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 312 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @airdrop_oracle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 312 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 88 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💵 KPMG Clears Tether Gold With $2.24B Physical Gold Audit
KPMG U.S. has issued an unqualified opinion on the 2025 financial statements of TG Commodities, the issuer of Tether's gold-backed token XAUT, after verifying over $2.24 billion in physical gold reserves. The audit is a snapshot of the company as of December 31, 2025.
The result marks XAUT's first Big Four audit more than five years after its launch, and mak…
⚖️ India's ED Raids CoinDCX and Delta Over Forex Violations
India's Enforcement Directorate searched crypto exchanges CoinDCX and Delta Exchange on November 6, alleging illegal cross-border flows that violated India's foreign exchange laws.
The ED alleges the exchanges routed Indian users' trades to Binance, Bybit and other offshore platforms via a Costa Rican shell entity. Both exchanges stated that trading, depos…
🚨 Indian Exchange Unocoin Offline After Security Incident
Indian cryptocurrency exchange Unocoin has been inaccessible to users following a security incident on November 9. Blockchain analytics platform Arkham Intelligence is showing zero holdings across approximately 81,000 addresses associated with the exchange. Unocoin confirmed the incident in a November 9 statement, though full details remain limited from the a…
🏦 Deutsche Bank Launches Crypto Custody for European Institutions
Germany's largest lender has officially launched its digital asset custody service for institutional and corporate clients across Europe, supporting Bitcoin, Ether, and three stablecoins. The service covers secure wallet management and transfers, and also includes an agreement covering tokenized funds and crypto ETCs.
The launch comes after a five-ye…
🚨 iOS 27.2.1 Leaves Crypto Wallet Flaw Unpatched
Apple's iOS 27.2.1 update failed to patch the "worse_query" sandbox escape vulnerability, which could expose cryptocurrency wallet data stored in plaintext, according to researcher forcequitOS. The flaw was disclosed on November 10 and remains open despite the update addressing nine other security issues.
Blockchain security firm SlowMist warned the bug could expose …
🚨 South Korea's Financial Security Agency Hit by Cyberattack
South Korea's Financial Security Institute has suffered a cyberattack exposing hundreds of employee records and documents belonging to dozens of financial companies. The breach comes less than two weeks after cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb reported a separate security incident.
Trade on Binance
🏦 Alta Raises $80M to Build Institutional Blockchain
Alta, a San Francisco-based financial infrastructure company, has raised $80 million in total funding — including a $47.5 million Series A led by Index Ventures, with participation from GV (Google Ventures), Blackbird Ventures, and Square Peg, plus $32.5 million in prior seed financing.
The company is building a blockchain designed for banks and financial institu…
₿ BlackRock's IBIT Logs $1.66B in Outflows Over Seven Sessions
US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $201 million in net outflows on Monday, extending a losing streak for BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) to seven consecutive sessions with cumulative withdrawals of $1.66 billion.
In a single session, BlackRock's Bitcoin and Ethereum products combined shed roughly $332.5 million — $213.2 million from IBIT and $119.3 …
💰 XRP Ledger Plans Quantum-Resistant Accounts by 2028
The XRP Ledger Foundation has outlined a design for quantum-proof accounts, allowing owners to add a quantum-resistant key and disable their existing one. The transition is fee-free for users, with a full network-wide switch targeted for 2028.
Trade on Binance
🚨 Blockaid Detects Active Exploit on Ankr's Ethereum Platform
Security firm Blockaid has flagged an ongoing exploit targeting Ankr's Ethereum platform. No further details on the scope, funds at risk, or attack vector have been confirmed at this stage. Ankr users are advised to exercise caution until an official update is issued.
Trade on Binance
🏦 Strategy Buys 1,036 BTC, Repurchases $188M in STRC
Strategy acquired 1,036 BTC for $81.9 million between Nov. 2–8, 2026, at an average price of $79,012 per coin, per an SEC Form 8-K filed Nov. 9. Total holdings now stand at 850,364 BTC.
The company also spent $188.3 million repurchasing STRC preferred shares and reported $4.9 billion in dollar assets. Separately, Strive added 29 BTC to its own treasury during the…
₿ Bitcoin Block Hits 11,255 Transactions, Near All-Time Record
A single Bitcoin block processed 11,255 transactions on November 7, 2026 — the second-highest transaction count in network history — coming close to a record set 11 years ago in 2015. The milestone arrives during a year already marked by exceptionally high daily transaction volumes on the Bitcoin network.
Trade on Binance
Showing the 12 most recent of 312 posts we hold for @airdrop_oracle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @airdrop_oracle as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
42 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrops Alert Pro @AirdropsAlertPro · 39,951 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
PAXGold Channel @PAXGold_Channel · 51,433 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Digital Zombies @digital_zombies · 304,264 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Hedgehog in the fog @hedgehoginthefogen · 254,201 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
$BEER 2.0 @beercoinchannel · 685,529 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Drop Club @drop_cryptogo · 1,322,198 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
GM Crypto @gm_cryp · 32,628 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,077,812 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Codyfight Announcements @codyfightnews · 46,722 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 273,948 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Forward Protocol @ForwardProtocol · 43,809 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten @INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,051,683 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Tomo Cat Community @tomo_cat · 1,974,425 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Unicorn Crypto Academy @unicorn_crypt · 498,936 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
Panther Airdrops @PantherAirdropsz · 58,237 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
WUFFI Announcements @wuffi_announcements · 1,077,670 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
CryptoProIncome @Cryptoproincome · 33,490 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 57,538 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Memecoin daily @memecoin_daily · 783,358 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
$STYLE Official @styletoken · 44,641 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Cryptopolitan @CryptopolitanOfficial · 23,947 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
INSIDER | News | Politics | USA @INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,644,246 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
AirdropAlert-com | Crypto Airdrops for Everyone @airdrop_alert_dot_com · 199,866 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
HOT Airdrops 🔥 GlimNetwork! @GlimNetwork · 19,806 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 93 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
21 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Oracle” (@airdrop_oracle), 702,326 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrop_oracle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.