⚖️ SEC Staff: Issuer Promises Can Trigger Securities Rules for Tokens SEC staff has clarified that a token not inherently classified as a security can still be offered as part of an investment contract depending on what issuers tell buyers. New staff guidance addresses how marketing language, network development commitments, buyback programs, staking receipts, and trading platform representations factor into securit…

Channel
Airdrop Oracle
@airdrop_oracle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
727,082subscribers
-27,846 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002000341787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @airdrop_oracle |
| Description | Top crypto news, plus the best airdrop and free-earn opportunities — all in one place. But remember DYOR. Advertisement: @TGowner999, @topovik_999 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/airdrop_oracle |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 727,082 | -3,149 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 730,231 | -1,246 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 731,477 | -919 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 732,396 | -895 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 733,291 | -1,034 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 734,325 | -1,663 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 735,988 | -2,022 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 738,010 | -927 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:27 | 738,937 | -795 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 739,732 | -687 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 740,419 | -700 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 741,119 | -651 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 741,770 | -729 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 742,499 | -505 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 743,004 | -549 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 743,553 | -590 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 744,143 | -516 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 744,659 | -1,226 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 745,885 | -797 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 746,682 | first reading |
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.141%
- avg views ÷ 727,082 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,020
- 92 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.446%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 92
- of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 172 (14 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 94,180 |
| Reactions total | 411 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,430
- Videos
- ≈22
- Links
- ≈1,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
853 reactions across 168 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 321 | 37.6% | |
| 👍 | 237 | 27.8% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 10.1% | |
| 👏 | 55 | 6.45% | |
| 😱 | 51 | 5.98% | |
| 👎 | 35 | 4.10% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 1.52% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 1.29% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 1.17% | |
| 😎 | 8 | 0.938% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 0.352% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.234% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.234% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.352% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 168 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 853 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 172 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @airdrop_oracle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 172 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
₿ Bitcoin holds $84K as Treasury yields hit multi-decade highs Bitcoin is trading near $84,000 despite a major US bond selloff pushing Treasury yields to their highest levels in decades. The 10-year yield climbed to 5.22% — the highest since 2007 — while the 30-year yield hit a 22-year high of 5.5185%. Traders responded by cutting exposure, with $1.7 billion in leveraged positions liquidated amid the macro turbulen…
🚨 Bitget Confirms $351M Security Breach in 2026 Bitget has confirmed a security breach totalling approximately $351.6–$352 million, making it one of the largest centralized exchange hacks on record. The incident was identified through unusual blockchain activity, with funds moving out of Bitget-labeled wallets across multiple assets including XRP, Ethereum, and stablecoins. Trade on Binance
😢4👍1
🚨 KelpDAO Sues LayerZero Over $292M rsETH Bridge Exploit KelpDAO has filed a lawsuit in British Columbia against LayerZero and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino over the April 18 exploit that drained approximately $292 million in rsETH from its cross-chain bridge — the largest crypto hack of 2026 so far. KelpDAO alleges LayerZero approved in writing the single-verifier bridge configuration that attackers ultimately explo…
🚨 Brooklyn Man Gets 12 Years for $16M Coinbase Phishing Scheme Ronald Spektor, 23, of Brooklyn, has been sentenced to four to twelve years in prison after pleading guilty to all 31 counts against him. He impersonated Coinbase support staff to convince roughly 100 users that hackers were targeting their accounts, then stole approximately $15.9 million in crypto from victims who handed over access to their funds. Tra…
⚖️ EU Regulators Flag Quantum Computing Risk to Blockchain Encryption The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities has warned that quantum computing could undermine the cryptographic foundations of blockchain networks, including Bitcoin, before practical civilian applications for the technology emerge. The warning renews debate over how Bitcoin should handle legacy addresses with already-exposed publ…
👍2❤1
🏦 UK Banks Complete First Interbank Tokenized Deposit Transactions Lloyds, NatWest, Barclays, and HSBC have completed what UK Finance describes as the world's first interbank transactions using tokenized deposits — blockchain-based commercial bank money tested across mortgage and peer-to-peer payments. The milestone is backed by the Bank of England, which favors tokenized deposits over privately issued stablecoins.…
❤2👏1😱1
🏦 NYSE and Blockchain.com Eye 24/7 Tokenized Stock Trading NYSE and Blockchain.com have signed an agreement to connect the crypto platform to NYSE's planned digital trading venue, targeting around-the-clock tokenized stock trading. The deal also includes two-way distribution of stock and crypto market data between the two platforms. Trade on Binance
❤1👍1😱1
🚨 North Korea Fake Job Scam Drained $11M From 7,000 Crypto Wallets A seven-agency advisory has linked the WaterPlum hacking group and Pyongyang's remote IT worker scheme to the same North Korean bureau. The operation used fake job interviews to compromise targets, draining $11 million across 7,000 crypto wallets. The joint advisory connects both the cyberattack infrastructure and the fraudulent IT worker placements…
😁3❤2🤯1😱1
💵 Visa and Reap Launch Stablecoin Credit Cards in 100+ Markets Visa and fintech firm Reap have announced a partnership to roll out stablecoin-linked credit cards across more than 100 markets globally. The program builds on Reap's existing Visa card issuance infrastructure, extending stablecoin-linked spending capabilities to businesses in new regions. Trade on Binance
👏3🔥2😱1
🏛 BitMEX Shuts Down After 11 Years of Operations BitMEX has removed all remaining spot, conversion, and derivatives markets as it enters its final hours before a September 23 shutdown. Owner and operator HDR Global Trading Limited approved the closure following a "strategic" review, ending more than 11 years of exchange operations. Trade on Binance
👍2❤1🔥1
📊 Crypto Market Cap Reclaims $3 Trillion Bitcoin traded near $86,000 as major altcoins rallied, pushing the total crypto market cap back above $3 trillion. Rising derivatives leverage across markets pointed to increased speculative activity during the move. Trade on Binance
❤3👍1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @airdrop_oracle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@seedupdates · 8,102,878#1
@catapult_extreme · 8,398,685#2
@trendingapps · 3,784,156#3
@dotcoincommunity · 3,940,724#4
@drop_cryptogo · 1,428,234#5
@gameechannel · 1,882,229#6
@nomis_protocol · 1,536,662#7
@hexnio · 1,998,607#8
@theTapCoins · 2,888,723#9
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 767,036#10
@NewsPlayToEarn · 2,296,166#11
@cryptosayer · 774,971#12
@memecoin_daily · 808,719#13
@wuffi_announcements · 1,122,179#14
@CRYPTO_jokker · 2,027,438#15
@notcoin · 8,552,225#16
@dogs · 7,065,215#17
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#18
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171#19
@CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,144,637#20
@CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,521,901#21
@beercoinchannel · 704,275#22
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#23
@catizenann · 3,550,802#24
@theyescoin · 5,634,397#25
@tomo_cat · 2,127,414#26
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#27
@crypto_drop_stukach · 5#28
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,507,910#29
@fx_holding_community · 5,999,312#30
@tomarket_ai · 6,580,713#31
@watersolmeme · 1,140,826#32
@gram · 6,641,039#33
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,234,054#34
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,473,393#35
@Cats_housewtf · 7,850,625#36
@hedgehoginthefogen · 261,709#37
@crypto_stukach · 563,644#38
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#39
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#40
@watbird · 1,476,557#41
@builders · 3,409,127#42
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#43
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,171,582#44
@monorixofficial · 1,320,600#45
@money · 2,932,436#46
@thenoton · 702,755#47
@boomloudcoin · 1,653,140#48
@unicorn_crypt · 509,453#49
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#50
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,112,277#51
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#52
@currentcryptonewsdaily · 1,025,345#53
@smpl_app · 1,606,691#54
@banana_update · 1,385,656#55
@degen_Crypto_Hub · 1,023,714#56
@token_1win · 2,980,801#57
@binance_announcements · 3,415,966#58
@sergeisergienkoen · 3,099,972#59
@VenomFoundationOfficial · 879,859#60
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#61
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#62
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#63
@avagoldcoin · 1,753,173#64
@cryptolifebro · 1,047,206#65
@dailyscan_en · 993,975#66
@catgoldminerann · 895,679#67
@Web3key_eng · 441,185#68
@CryptoMemeFoundation · 1,836,756#69
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#70
@WagmiHub_News · 1,074,306#71
@polyrangercom · 1,782,465#72
@ToNmetasilense · 2,730,678#73
@tea_solmeme · 1,176,954#74
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#75
@CloutCoinSol · 965,464#76
@cryptoAIAGI · 1,042,282#77
@vestirussia · 975,954#78
@babydogecoin · 1,019,704#79
@TONPOINTEReng · 539,702#80
@iamalexfalcon · 3,054,448#81
@INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,774,773#82
@INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,116,706#83
@INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,376,326#84
@INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,185,207#85
@finansist_busines · 620,476#86
@Sport_HUB_football · 1,369,987#87
@realgoats_channel · 4,621,170#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AirdropsAlertPro · 42,130
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@PAXGold_Channel · 53,599
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@digital_zombies · 319,034
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@hedgehoginthefogen · 261,709
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@beercoinchannel · 704,275
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@drop_cryptogo · 1,428,234
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@gm_cryp · 34,031
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
@CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,144,637
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@codyfightnews · 49,113
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@theshadoworder · 295,924
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@ForwardProtocol · 45,425
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,116,706
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@tomo_cat · 2,127,414
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
@unicorn_crypt · 509,453
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
@PantherAirdropsz · 63,578
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
@wuffi_announcements · 1,122,179
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@Cryptoproincome · 34,957
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@EnginesOfFuryNews · 59,553
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@memecoin_daily · 808,719
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@styletoken · 46,652
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@CryptopolitanOfficial · 25,000
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,774,773
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@airdrop_alert_dot_com · 193,125
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
@GlimNetwork · 20,780
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 89 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
21 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Oracle” (@airdrop_oracle), 727,082 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrop_oracle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.