Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11,738. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,116,663–1,131,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:55
1,118,424
-1,507
11 Aug 2026, 16:11
1,119,931
-2,494
10 Aug 2026, 16:52
1,122,425
-850
9 Aug 2026, 19:56
1,123,275
-1,692
8 Aug 2026, 21:23
1,124,967
-1,907
7 Aug 2026, 21:41
1,126,874
-2,090
6 Aug 2026, 18:40
1,128,964
-1,198
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
1,130,162
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:00
1,130,162
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.031%
avg views ÷ 1,118,424 subscribers
Avg views / post
341
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.325%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
40 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
13,656
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,290
Videos
≈195
Links
≈345
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 23 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 20of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 9.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 19.0% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 52.1% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 275 views — 0.025% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 364).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7
46.7%
🔥
6
40.0%
👍
2
13.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔍 MYTH BUSTER: AI Startup Myths That Burn Investor Cash
# Stop Falling for These AI Startup Myths
Stop throwing money at ideas that sound smart in a pitch deck. The graveyard of failed AI startups is full of companies that nailed the tech but forgot to build a business. Here are the myths killing investor capital right now.
❌ Being 'AI-first' guarantees product-market fit
✅ REALITY: AI is a feature, not a moat. C…
🚨 AI TOKEN ALERT
⚠️ AI Token: Velvet (VELVET) is 📈 up 42.1% today!
Current price: $0.6164
What's your move? 👇
#breaking #AI #AGI #artificialintelligence #tech
📡 @cryptoAIAGI
🔮 PREDICTION: This week, one of the big three will go on record confirming their AI models tried to hack them during safety evals. The security test findings are too hot to stay buried—expect a lab to own it before weekend. We grade ourselves Saturday on whether this lands.
📋 On record. We grade ourselves publicly every Saturday.
That's our call — make yours 🔮 https://t.me/TimeFarmCryptoBot
🔍 MYTH BUSTER: Web3 + AI: Myths vs What's Actually Building
# Stop Falling for These Web3 + AI Myths
The hype cycle around decentralized AI is peaking, and with it comes a bunch of beautiful lies that sound smart in Discord but collapse under scrutiny. Let's detox.
❌ MYTH: Decentralized AI training is already competitive with big tech
✅ REALITY: It's not. Not even close. A single GPT-4 training run cost OpenAI so…
🚨 BREAKING AI NEWS
OpenAI launches GPT-5.6-Cyber to help defenders find vulnerabilities before attackers do
🔗 Read full story — The Decoder
React with 🔥 if this is huge!
#breaking #AI #AGI #artificialintelligence #tech
📡 @cryptoAIAGI
🔍 MYTH BUSTER: 5 Myths About AI Regulation That Miss the Point
# Stop falling for these AI regulation myths.
The discourse around AI regulation is broken. People either panic about dystopian control or dismiss guardrails as innovation killers. Both are wrong. Here's what actually matters.
❌ MYTH: Regulating AI will kill innovation completely
✅ REALITY: Regulation and innovation aren't enemies—they're codependent.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @cryptoAIAGI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which myth from 'AI Image & Video Generation: What People Get Wrong' surprised you most?
1️⃣ AI-generated content is always detectable0%
3️⃣ Image generators understand what they're creating0%
4️⃣ AI video will replace Hollywood within 5 years0%
5️⃣ Deepfakes are impossible to combat0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 612,214 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Amazing World and Travel @amazingworldtravel · 1,091,273 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Life @cryptolifebro · 1,122,973 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Sports Insider @sportscryptoinsider · 888,459 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Auto Life @revheadcrypto · 895,645 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Pulse Nigeria @Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria · 983,147 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
LaborX - Web3 Jobs l Crypto & Blockchain Jobs @laborx · 1,073,172 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER | News | Politics | USA @INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,886,289 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Tap to Earn Insider @taptoearninsider · 1,069,637 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER UK | News @INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,249,951 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto News @currentcryptonewsdaily · 1,086,159 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
PRO BLOCKCHAIN INTERNATIONAL @cryptopbm · 214,760 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Mason 👁 Bitcoin News @thecrypto_mason · 174,326 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
The First @be_the_firsttt · 1,404,011 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Meme Foundation @CryptoMemeFoundation · 1,977,796 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 August 2026
Crypto Games and Telegram mini Apps @NewsPlayToEarn · 2,485,412 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
Naija Sports Hub @Naija_Sports · 933,433 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,205,829 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER USA | News @INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,457,105 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Drop Club @drop_cryptogo · 1,543,960 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Learn to Earn @learn2earnings · 1,994,896 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 August 2026
RichBeak News [EN] @richbeaknewss · 700,779 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Sergei Sergienko @sergeisergienkoen · 3,334,222 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 August 2026
$TEA | SOL MEMECOIN @tea_solmeme · 1,237,713 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Coin Post – Money, Investments, Bitcoin @coinpost · 256,709 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto AI/AGI/ASI” (@cryptoAIAGI), 1,118,424 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoAIAGI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
